Animals are not inanimate objects to be used for our own selfish purposes; especially, not to be user nor abused as accessories whether Paris Hilton uses her little dog, Tinkerbell, as an accessory, or not is debateable. Some people treat their animals like people and want to be with their pets everywhere they go. I really doubt that Paris Hilton abuses her dog or shows him or her as an accessory as some have argued. If Paris Hilton didn't love her dog, then she wouldn't have offered a $5,000 reward when her cute, innocent dog went missing. Conclusion: Animals aren't accessories nor should be treated as such. However, someone carrying their pet with them, doesn't automatically define them as using them as a fashion accessory.

You know, while I'm not a fan of PETA, or even the sort of people who join PETA, I kind of have to agree here. I wouldn't trust Paris Hilton with a goldfish, much less a dog. Even if the dog is an inbred, useless, rat-like thing.

Aren't people supposed to be locked up when they pose a threat to themselves and others?

Ya the dogs have more brains then the owner .Hilton is short in the brain department.