Powered by i.TV
May 23, 2013

The Five: Reasons NOT to kill off Ana Lucia

by Anna Johns, posted Feb 22nd 2006 11:05AM
ana lucia the fiveI wholeheartedly disagree with this editorial in the Toronto Star. The writer calls for Ana Lucia's character to be killed off on Lost. He'd like to see her get scurvy, mauled by a polar bear, "vanish into a black cloud", or get shot in a special guest appearance by Dick Cheney. He says that, despite her tragic back-story, Ana Lucia is not a captivating character. He thinks she lacks depth and doesn't like her attitude. He also calls for the "killing-off" of Izzie on Grey's Anatomy, so he may just be completely out of his mind.

Here are five reasons to keep Ana Lucia alive:

5. We love to hate her.  Why does everybody have to get along? So she's abrasive and lacks common sense or civility. She has a management style thats, um, different. That makes for a great, strong character. Even if we do hate her.

4. Sexual tension.  Ana Lucia fits right in the middle of the Kate-Jack-Sawyer love triangle and messes everything up! Something needed to happen to complicate that love triangle that was about to get old, and Ana Lucia was that something.

3. Shannon & Sawyer.  I hated Shannon and Sawyer for a good chunk of the first season. Shannon with her snarl and her designer clothes, and Sawyer with his indifference for others were infuriating! But, if you'll remember, they both became endearing characters. By the time she was killed, I was very sad to see Shannon go. And I would totally lose my mind if the writers killed off Sawyer, even though he has returned to his criminal ways. Give it time. There is a lot more back story to reveal and, as with Shannon and Sawyer, she could always redeem herself.

2. Harmony is for hippies.  While The Others are interesting, Lost would get really boring if there wasn't internal conflict within the castaways. This show needs a lot of flavors of conflict to keep it churning. Ana Lucia already has built-in conflict with Jack and Sayid and I can see a cat fight in the future between her and Kate.

1. It's too obvious.  Killing off Ana Lucia wouldn't be shocking or have an impact because we're not close to her character and she's not likable (yet). That's a boring, predictable storyline that wouldn't have any lasting impact on any of the characters. Although, it would totally piss off these fans.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

18 Comments

Filter by:
James Joyner

I started watching "Lost" way behind the curve. My wife and I both thought it was yet another of the "reality TV" shows for some reason. We have now caught up very quickly via DVD and iTunes video downloads, plus the last few shows via TiVo.

I'm not a huge fan of the Ana Lucia character, although Michelle Rodriguez is pretty hot. The crazed cop bit has been done to death and she's not bringing anything new to it.

April 20 2006 at 1:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sups

I like ana lucia very much, she makes it interesting for the show. I believe she is going to hook up wit sayid by the end of the show.

April 10 2006 at 6:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
thatguy

Ana Lucia is just like Sawyer, minus the depth or nuanced performances.

March 06 2006 at 4:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nerak

I don't like Anna Lucia, Lizzie or the actresses who play them. They could kill off Anna Lucia and Lizzie, and it wouldn't hurt the show any. It would improve it. It lost something for me when they introduced their characters into the show. I don't care what their background is. They just aren't likeable. The ONLY good thing about the Tailes joining the rest of the group is the fact that Rose and Bernard are back together. I pretty much like the rest of the characters, although I'm not real fond of Kate. I really can't see Jack or Sawyer getting interested in Anna Lucia, and it makes me sick that they are trying to put Hurley and Lizzie together. I mainly watch the show to see if they ever find Walt and get him back. I really liked the first season, and I bought the DVD. I don't know if the second season will be worth wasting money on. Just my opinion. Enjoy the show.

March 01 2006 at 10:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jkmerengue

Ahhh, thanks Tom...blog projection. That makes me feel better, I thought I had missed an episode or something, heaven forbid. Could be a possible scenario, could be...though the LOST writing staff is pretty good at giving us completely NOT what we're expecting. That's what we love about them!

February 24 2006 at 1:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom

Jenny -- I think that it is well established, blog-wise, that we all expect the big reveal to be that Locke's father, a con-man who conned him out of a kidney, was named Sawyer, and was also the "Sawyer" who conned Lost-Sawyer's father. Make sense? I hope so.

February 24 2006 at 7:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Anna

Oh, I forgot to mention my theory about Ana Lucia's past. I think we're going to get a flashback where she and Jack joined the "mile high" club before the crash.

February 23 2006 at 6:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jkmerengue

Quote from Tom:
"2) Sawyer -- ... I think that the only thing that really needs resolving for him is for Locke to fill him in on Locke's father."

Okay, I'm confused, Tom....what does Sawyer have to do with Locke's father? I know he is connected with Jack's father and hasn't he met Kate's mother? But I don't remember that Sawyer/Locke connection.

Sorry, I know it's not a direct Ana Lucia post, but I am floundering here...wait, okay...Why haven't they been using AL more? For two or three shows, such build-up, the out-and-out star of the "Tailies" backstory, then....Nothing? What's up?

I really liked AL's scenes with Goodwin. And why did they have to kill him off? I thought he was a very interesting character, even moreso when he was exposed as one of the "Others"! They should have had him be wounded and then drag himself back into the forest. It didn't hurt that he reminded me of my fav, Sean Bean, either.

February 23 2006 at 1:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
cuddles

i agree we need to get to know her first and agree with her existance on the island to make it a great shock.. and we need some one to disagree and give out the whole time.. xxxcuddles

February 23 2006 at 12:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom

Is anyone else pissed that the repeat is the pilot of the show? Couldn't they at least have given us the episode where Hurley gets on the plane?

I admit it. I like Ana Lucia. I think her backstory is pretty compelling. I could stand to get rid of a few other characters though, in the following order:

(1) Charlie -- I don't find his story compelling and I think he's really turning into an annoyingly bad guy. His is the only character I would actively campaign against right now (i.e. I want the little Hobbit dead).

(2) Sawyer -- I love his character, and would hate to see him go. But I think the death of his character lends the most to the direction the story is headed. And I think that the only thing that really needs resolving for him is for Locke to fill him in on Locke's father. I would be sad to see him go though.

(3) Kate (before Ana Lucia) -- Face it, her storyline has faded a bit this year, and I'm not sure how compelling the rest of it is. I doubt they kill her off though, because of the love triangles and the way they have worked some of her connections in this year indirectly (like Sayid and her father). But then again, before lost she was the "Live Links" girl--that's not a great Hollywood pedigree. I wouldn't feel too safe if I were her. At least Michelle Rodriguez has some acting chops.

(4) Apollo (Lee Adama) -- Jamie Bamber just sucks and is miscast in the role...oh wait, that's over on Battlestar Galactica. Sorry, Dorv, did it again--I ripped BSG on the Lost blog again.

February 23 2006 at 12:46 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners