Powered by i.TV
May 24, 2012

TV news has changed since President Reagan was shot

by Bob Sassone, posted Mar 30th 2006 5:29PM
Today is the 25th anniversary of the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan in Washington. Today, CNN showed video of their live coverage from that day in 1981 (Bernard Shaw coming on the air live with the sketchy details, forgetting to put his mic on, staffers running around in the background). It's an interesting piece of video, because it shows how much TV news has changed in all these years.

If this were to happen today, we'd have helicopter footage of the shooting, a Google map of the area so we can all orient ourselves to what it looked like, and we'd have 17 different pundits, journalists, doctors, and lawyers on each of the 24 hour news channels (and the networks), telling us what this means politically, what it means medically, what it means legally, what people are talking about on the web. Maybe even how this will affect the voting on American Idol next week.

It's really interesting to see how much TV has changed in the past quarter century, and how a concept of a "CNN," a "24 hour news channel" was so intriguing and new and raw back in '81.

Where were you when you heard the news about Reagan?

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

5 Comments

Filter by:
mc

The problem with CNN is that it spawned the other news networks. Now you have the 24 hour networks, CBS, ABC, NBC and regional news networks all trying to be the first to report. Then they all want to provide various viewpoints of the story which creates all these "experts" (where did they find some of these people). And then they beat the story to death (think "MonicaGate"). Olbermann was fired from CNN for not wanting to do another Monica show because there was nothing new to report. Now the news stations are reporting entertainment news like it is real news. CNN was great then but it created a monster.

March 31 2006 at 10:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SamMalone

Ironically, they seemed to cover international events better back then. Now there isn't enough time between the "Medical Watch" segments.

March 31 2006 at 9:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Samual Icky

Back then the TV News actually was news... and reporters actually did some leg work before reporting a story...

March 30 2006 at 10:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
malc

I sure hope things are getting better. Today we get so much information so quickly that is presented to us day after day.

March 30 2006 at 10:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joshua Stein

I was 6, and watching Woody Woodpecker on tv, when it was rudely interrupted by news I didn't care about. I think I even asked my dad to put the cartoons back on.

March 30 2006 at 8:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners