Gilmore Girls: Super Cool Party People
(S06E20)
After I read the awesome interview Mike
Ausiello of TVGuide.com conducted with Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino, I began to understand the TV
business a little better. First of all, it seems like what the Palladinos were seeking from Warner Brothers was a) a
little security, hence the request for 2 years, even if the show was only going to last just one, and b) a little help,
because they didn't seem to have the extensive writing and producing staff that other hit shows seem to have. They got
neither, so they walked.What also struck me about the interview is how fiercely they defended their creative vision of the show (something they won't at all be involved with in Season 7, by the way... no pay, no guidance) despite what many feel has been a down season for Gilmore Girls. To them, the characters need to develop and grow, and everything isn't going to be hunky-dory all the time, especially with Luke and Lorelai.
But that's still not an excuse for... this.
Granted, the episode had its moments: I loved it when Rory got to the hospital and bitched out Logan's constantly glib Life and Death Brigade buddies, who continued to spit out bon mots even though their best friend just got out of intensive care. I liked the way Paris got the medical details out of the doctor. I also liked the way Rory confronted Mitchum Huntzberger telephonically, telling him to grow a pair, stop making a statement and visit his injured son in the hospital. I did a little fist pump at that commercial break. But I can't help but wonder if the Palladinos and Dave Rosenthal didn't pull out the old TV cliché of a serious injury bringing a rocky couple together because they couldn't figure out any other way to get out of the Logan-Rory hole they dug themselves. I mean, really: he goes and selfishly jumps off a cliff and almost gets killed, and that's what Rory needs to start loving him again? I thought she was smarter than that. Maybe she thinks she's the only one who actually gives a rat's ass about they guy.
I also loved Ceasar's improvements to the diner, including the goofy signs like "How about a nice plate of Chicken Fingers?" that people just look at and read to Luke, much to his annoyance.
Now on to Luke and Lorelai. We finally find out why Luke has resisted having Lor meet April all this time: Lorelai's too damn cool. He felt that as soon as April met Lorelai, she'd forget all about him. Good for Lorelai to at least say the words "I want to be a part of it" as they shop for gifts for April's birthday party (what town where they in? The theater was showing an Orson Welles retrospective!). I was getting happy as Luke called Lor begging her to save the party he made boring. I was even happier when Lor came over, made the party into a success (Molly Ringwald is the Audrey Hepburn of her time? Really?), and bonded with April. Finally. Our long national nightmare is over; no more April tension, no more beating around the bush. The happy look on Lorelai's face as she recapped the party to Sookie was so satisfying.
Then, enter Anna Nardini.
She was pissed that Luke let Lorelai, a woman she's never met, run April's party and sleep over. It's understandable; she's protective of her daughter and doesn't want her around strangers. But when Lor finds out and decides to go to Anna's store, we find out that Anna's reasons were a bit different... and silly. She tells Lorelai, that she doesn't want April to get attached to someone who might leave, considering her relationship with Luke is tenuous as it is. No problem, right? Luke and Lor are engaged. Not good enough, says Anna. Until they're married, it won't be stable. She doesn't care if L and L have been going down this road for years, and the work Lorelai's put in to get this to work, without the ring, this relationship could very easily fail and hurt April.
Whaaaaaaa? Why isn't being engaged good enough for Anna? Does she know something about Luke that we don't know, evidence that Lorelai might not make it to the altar with him? If not, Anna seems to be a bit irrational here. I mean, single parents are very sensitive about exposing their kids to their potential mates, but not that sensitive. It's pretty impossible for a kid not to have interacted or bonded with a parent's siginifcant other by the time that SO becomes a fiancée, so I'm not sure if Anna's argument holds water.
In fact, it doesn't. It's another plot contrivance that the Palladinos have put in to keep L and L from being together. The previews for next week have Lorelai storming into the diner saying the "E" word, which I'm sure will freak Luke out. Great. What number is Christopher on Lorelai's cell-phone speed dial?

12 Comments