Powered by i.TV
May 21, 2013

Christian stations wary of "a la carte" cable

by Adam Finley, posted Jun 11th 2006 3:07PM

jesus watching tvChristians are in a disagreement over whether or not "a la carte" cable, the ability to pick and choose which stations you want to have rather than buying "packages" of various channels, is a good thing. Some argue it's a means of protecting children and families from channels that carry "inappropriate" programming, but evangelicals behind such religious-themed networks as the Trinity Broadcasting Network and Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network claim people could cut those networks out just as easily as networks such as MTV. The response to this, of course, is that only certain Christians watch these networks anyway, so why does it matter? Colby May, an attorney for the Faith and Family Broadcasting Coalition which represents the two aforementioned networks, is against the concept of "a la carte" cable, claiming the by having Christian stations as part of the lineup increases the chances of people serendipitously stumbling across them and "[changing] their life for the better." Dan Isett of the Parents Television Council argues, however, that allowing viewers to pick and choose could create diversified programming and ultimately help such stations.

[via Huffington Post]

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

14 Comments

Filter by:
BF

As a Christian, I would be glad to have this option down here in Australia. From what I've heard about CBN and TBN in the USA, it makes Australia's "Australian Christian Channel" sound tame. But either way, I'd still like to be able to excise it from my basic cable/satellite tv package quite simply because the programming is cheesy to the core and at times disturbs me with its ultra-right wing bias. Heck, I'd like to be able to excise Fox News Channel too...

June 14 2006 at 6:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tarie Brill

If the Christian broadcast stations are worried about people not wanting their programming, maybe they should improve it. I have chosen not to have TV at all for nearly 10 years, because I need cable to get reception, and don't want all the junk. If I could chose my stations, I'd probably go for it. I am a strong and active christian, and would probably not chose the christian stations. I think they're cheesey.

June 13 2006 at 12:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ben Roden

I'm a Christian--conservative at that--and I think it's a great idea to go a la carte. If the programming is worth watching, people will opt in. Anything that doesn't measure up probably isn't making that much of a difference anyway. There will will always be a market for religious programming of any kind and even the major networks get on board when they realize they can make some money off it. Ever notice that when PBS is in pinch they break out "Elvis Sings Gospel?" I'm not much of a fan of most of the Christian programming that's out there, and this would bring in better content.

June 13 2006 at 2:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cyclist

I don't think the televangelists give a rip about anything but extracting dollars from the masses while using the Lord's name in vain to do it. I say let the market decide if these guys sink or swim. If they really believe someone may receive salvation through their programming, it would seem to me that they have a responsibility before God to pay for it themselves, not relying on the dollars of those who subscribe to cable packages so they can watch sports, nudity, and, God forbid, MTV.

June 12 2006 at 11:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MrC

The main problem they're worried about is revenue related. Right now these stations make money (even if it's just pennies a month) per subscriber from the cable and satelite systems they are carried on. So let's say Dish Network has 10,000,000 subscribers. TBN get's 10,000,000*X (where X is probably a penny or less) every month.

Switch to al la carte, even if the per subscriber fee goes up, the number of subscribers drops to

June 12 2006 at 2:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Elliott

Thanks for the laugh TC. Mentioning "brainwashing" on a post about religious cable. Oh the (non-existent) irony!

June 12 2006 at 11:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TC

I don't think it would hurt them either. My Mom would love to watch the Christian channels, though the Dems have her brainwashed so badly with their agenda about Republicans taking away Social Security. Must be though on the liberal that so many who are religious still vote Democrat like my Mom and my Aunts. I know you don't want them on your side, so keep up whatever you've been doing the last 12 years - I love it! Damn those people who believe in something and aren't soulless, huh?

Thank God (and Jesus) that liberals have such condescending views of everyone who's not living in their parents basement or working for Viacom and Google. Good luck in those elections. Woo, baby! :)

June 12 2006 at 11:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
just some dude

A la carte can only go so far. If a station broadcasts OTA in your area, then the cable co's are bound by the FCC under must-carry regulations to carry them. So towns with religious stations (or shopping channels) OTA won't be as affected.

June 12 2006 at 8:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike Davis

I never thought about this-but this makes total sense. I imagine a ton of stations going belly up. Why should I pay for some religious station to be in business to promote their own bigoted agenda that I don't agree with?

June 12 2006 at 1:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gordon Werner

there are two groups of stations that I would immediately cut out if it were possible to do so.

the crap religious channels and the 36 or so home shopping channels

Good Riddance.

June 12 2006 at 12:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners