Powered by i.TV
May 25, 2012

MSNBC not changing name ... yet

by Bob Sassone, posted Jun 15th 2006 11:40AM
NBCHere's a story I don't quite understand. Everyone knows that MSNBC's shows often lag behind the shows and news coverage offered by rivals CNN and FOX News, so why wouldn't they change their name? The name change has been hinted at since NBC bought the majority stake in the company from Microsoft (the "MS" in the channel's name).

A change to NBC News Channel (or whatever name they would give the network) would not only sounds a lot better than MSNBC (which was always an odd name for a news network - NBC News would give an air of authority and gravitas to the channel), but maybe changing the name would be a kick in the pants not only to the employees of the station but also to viewers. Change, as they say, is good, so I don't see what possible positive point there would be in keeping an old name that is associated with second or third place?

Sure, the reason in the article below is that the channel has such a close association with Microsoft and the web site that it would be hard to change. But I don't buy it.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

2 Comments

Filter by:
Chris McCaw

hehe Maybe they can get the "XYZ" name that ABC wanted for the long-failing ABC Family (to make it a bookend to go w/ their ABC) and convert it to a young women's channel, but can't since Pat Robertson put it in the unbreakable contracts he signed w/ cable companies for carriage stating the word "family" HAS to be included in the stations name FOREVER! :-p

June 15 2006 at 7:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Murty

Interesting one.

June 15 2006 at 6:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners