I take these complaints with a grain of sand. HDTV does not even come close resolution-wise to pristine 35mm motion picture film. You are talking 4000 lines of resolution vs. 1080. So HDTV is not going to reveal anything new from viewing films.

As for the adult industry, in the 70s the material was shot on film. Even it it was 16mm, that's still higher res than current HDTV standards.

HD will create a lot of jobs for good makeup technicians.

I wonder how weird that would be to have to wear makeup all the time. I guess it's just one of the many costs of being a celebrity.

What's the difference between HD and HDV?

I know I saw an article once about which celebs look good in HD. Here's one...
http://www.tvpredictions.com/thelist.html

Maybe we will learn to stop judging people on theu beauty and more for their Ability?

Ha Ha, who am I fooling. We will just have more 18yo on TV trying to play adults. Instead of the other way around (see: 90210 in the waining years)

Admission is difficult, but it was professional for me.

I've seen HD porn footage (in HD), and it is as bad as you could imagine. Stuff that's being shot in FULL HD, not HDV, is pretty tough to watch with a lot of women. A local producer came into our office at my previous employer, and he shoots full HD stuff for HDNET. Since Cuban won't take anything less than 1080i/720p at full 4:4:4, you don't get to cop out with HDV.

So, you get to see tats covered up with makeup, bad makeup, stretch marks, etc. It all shows up.

And again, too much self admission, those in the business that are shooting in "HD" are either shooting film still, or are shooting in HDV, which will produce different results. Since no one is publishing HD porn to an optical format yet we don't have much comparison, but trust me. The industry is ready for HD, but we aren't.

Speaking of regular television, I'm not looking forward to reality TV shows at all in HD. ugh. As if those people weren't ugly enough.

Add to that, that I NEVER won't to see HD PORN.