Stupid article of the day
Print journalists are always dumping on the TV side, calling TV journalists "talking heads" or "more interested in the appearances than the news" or saying they "don't go deep enough" in their stories. So this is what makes this Wall Street Journal article so funny.
Writer Vanessa O'Connel wonders (and in the very first sentence too) "Is Katie Couric changing her look?" Yes, it's an entire article examining the new promos that CBS is running for Couric's new CBS Evening News gig. O'Connell wonders why Couric is now wearing a serious black dress and pearls instead of the clothes she wore on Today.
What, did she used to wear clown outfits and bathrobes on Today? Is she really that different? And even if she is, what, you never changed your clothing because of a job change?
But that's not all: O'Connell goes on to interview various experts about Couric's wardrobe. One of the experts even suggests that Charles Gibson (yes, he's no longer officially Charlie!) should wear lighter colors so it's "more flattering." Ugh.
Favorite line: "Neither Ms. Couric nor CBS, which hopes she'll attract younger viewers without alienating the old guard, would discuss her anchor wardrobe - although a spokesman for Ms. Couric says she at times wore the same black suit on the Today Show. But how Ms. Couric looks will help shape her images as she discusses weighty topics like The Middle East."

3 Comments