Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

After Corddry leaves The Daily Show, who's left?

by Joel Keller, posted Aug 23rd 2006 2:33PM
Rob CorddryI'm worried about The Daily Show.

As most fans of the show know by now, this is Rob Corddry's last week; he's leaving so he can concentrate on his new Fox sitcom The Winner, among other projects. He's the last of the three "Big Cs" -- Corddry, Carell, Colbert -- that helped bring the show into its own in the early part of the decade, perfecting their particular reporter roles to the point where the humor came as much out of their characters as from making fun of the news or profile subject. Colbert was the poorly-informed smug guy; Carell was pathetic, and Corddry was the Masshole. High comedy all around. And now, he's taking off, just like the other two Cs before him.

Normally, I wouldn't be that concerned about it, as TDS has been rotating new reporters in and out of the show for the last ten years, the rock-solid Samanta Bee and Ed Helms are still hanging around, and John Hodgman's occasional appearances are a riot. But none of the new correspondents the show has brought in over the last year has made much of an impact. Jason Jones is trying to be Colbert, and is doing a poor imitation. Dan Bakkedhal hasn't seemed to establish any kind of character yet. And of the "tryouts," the only one that sort of stands out is Asif Mandvi, who they've brought in to be a "Middle Eastern Affairs correspondent." Even Lewis Black's sporadic appearances aren't as funny as they used to be.

(Oh, and I love British humor, but two of the guys they've brought on -- both Brits -- have made the show sound more like a Monty Python episode than the uniquely American TDS.)

So here's what I'm wondering: Is TDS starting to slip? As good as Jon Stewart is, he can't carry the show by himself; he needs a strong complement of correspondents to not only take some of the comedic load, but to interplay with during the live "remotes" and "desk chats". Since Helms and Bee's participation this year has been limited (and will continue that way, what with Bee's and Jones' new baby, and Helms' new role on The Office), he's going to have to depend on the new guys, and I don't trust any of them to become the strong performers the Big Cs turned out to be. Maybe if they give Mandvi a more expanded role, that might help. What do you think? Let me know in the comments.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

41 Comments

Filter by:
Sue

i think it is sad that all the funny guys left, Rob Corddry, Ed Helms and Colbert, but at least Colbert has his own show and most time it is pretty funny. they should have John Oliver and Hodgeman regular since they are very good. the new one last night on Nov. 14 was terrible, and for 10 longest min.

October 19 2006 at 7:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Shelly

Remember, when Jon Stewart started, no one thought he would fill the shoes of his predecessor Craig K, and he did...and then some. I know Jon supports his former co-workers 100% and hopefully they all will flourish as well. I agree, that shows like these are destined to go through these changes. Dont sell the next new guy or girl, short. The writing will keep the show alive.

September 08 2006 at 8:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jay

The show ebbs and flows. A few correspondants are always good (Rob, Ed, Hodgman), some are on some days off on others (Samantha, Black) and some rarely hit (Jason, Nate Corddry). And there are up and potential comers (Martin, Mandvi, Wilmore, Oliver).

Nevertheless, in the end analysis, good, bad or indifferent, TDS is still by far and away the best thing on at 8pm ET.

August 29 2006 at 8:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tripper

Are you referring to the same tall blond guy who is in that Verizon ad?

His name is Bob Wiltfong. He was actually a real news guy for years before leaving that world for improvisational comedy. His blog details his current projects - he talked about doing stuff for TDS up through mid-2005, but nothing since. On his Wikipedia entry they said something about him having an issue with Colbert, which seems odd.

Or maybe Matt Walsh - who appeared in "Old School" and has been in other stuff, too. He's currently on "Dog Bites Man".

I can't think of any other blondies who have been on the show recently off the top of my head.

Oh, and on Mo Rocca: He deserves those crappy shows he does for VH1. He and my former HHS classmate Michael Ian Black (Schwartz!) can just go be unfunny somewhere else - hopefully far from Comedy Central.

Tripper

August 29 2006 at 12:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MattG

I really don't have a problem with any of the new talent, and sometimes found Rob Corddry a little obnoxious. I just felt he tried a little too hard when he realized that the other two C's were taking off. However, I find it strange that nobody has metioned his brother, Nate. I thought that a couple of the things he did were very funny, though I haven't seen him on for awhile. I wish they would explore that option again.

August 29 2006 at 2:02 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Samir Shah

Asif Mandvi and Wilmore, as well as John Oliver have been the standouts of the last few months, and all should be kept in the picture

August 29 2006 at 12:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ted Johnston

I disagree with this article; I don't think the Daily Show is slipping at all.

I don't think Jason Jones is being a Colbert wannabe. I think he and Dan Bakkedahl are supposed to be "generic" characters that simply lampoon your average news guy. Jones also brings a couple Canadian jokes to the show every now and then. Also, for those who don't know, Jason Jones and Sam Bee are married, and the show makes use of that for jokes every now and then as well.

I disagree with what this guy says about the British correspondents. I think John Oliver is HILARIOUS and brings great British flavor to the show. Dave Gorman (Poll Smoking) was also hilarious, and I'm just wondering why they don't use him more.

In short, yes, the good 'ol days of the 3 C's are over, but the road looks bright ahead with plenty of good new people to carry the torch.

It's a transition. It's kinda like how no one liked the new studio and three projection screens at first, but it's turned out to work great (the "Ministry of Truth" segment, anyone?) Just give it a while, the new correspondents will grow on you.

August 27 2006 at 10:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SeanTubbs

The new folks they have on now are just learning their chops. If you go back to the first few segments that Bakkendahl did, they weren't very good. But the pimp segment he did recently was great. They'll need some time to get back up to speed. I do hope they do more of the Trendspotting guy's stuff.

I'm glad to see all the new faces. They're not all great, but they'll go if they're not good.

August 27 2006 at 8:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dave

who was the tall blond guy that has been on in the past few years? I can't think of his name, but I thought he was pretty good.

August 27 2006 at 3:12 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mac

I'm sure TDS will swing up and down as mentioned above and eventually it will have another great period (which is certainly not now).

The real trouble now is that the reporters are not comfortable or convincing enough to make the comedic foil formula work with Stewart (who is the only guy who is supposed to understand that it's all a pile a shit & laugh at even his own jokes). The best reporters on TDS have been intelligent & quick witted enough to roll with some improv and convey a sense that they could be sincere in their crazed view points. This is severely lacking now, but it may come with time and experience for some of the newbies.

August 26 2006 at 8:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners