Powered by i.TV
February 11, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip: Pilot (series premiere)

by Bob Sassone, posted Sep 18th 2006 11:00PM

Studio 60

(S01E01) OK, I'm going to make a bold statement here, so I hope you're sitting down. I assume you are because you're in front of a computer, but if you're standing for some reason, please, sit down.

All set? OK, here goes: Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip is the best new show of the fall.

And I say that even though I haven't yet seen the other show being touted as the best new show, ABC's The Nine. The tape is sitting to the left of me as I type this, so I'll be watching it soon (thanks ABC for sending me a tape instead of a DVD. What, is this 1999?). But I can't imagine that the show has the combination that Studio 60 has after two episodes. One is the obvious quality right out of the gate (creator, writer, director, cast, etc), and the other is this incredible, palpable feeling you get watching it that, even though everything doesn't work across the board, you know it could get even better. That the strong moments far, far outweigh the bad moments.

And it's straight out entertaining as hell.

The quick premise: Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip is a long-running Friday night musical/variety show on the NBS network (*cough* SNL *cough*). Creator and producer Wes Mendell (Judd Hirsch) knows that the show has become a stale, unfunny shadow of its former self (*cough* SNL *cough*), and during a live broadcast, he interrupts the opening sketch about President Bush and goes off on a rant, criticizing the network and their shows about eating bugs and becoming Donald Trump (*cough* NBC *cough*). This pretty much guarantees his firing from boss Jack (Steven Weber), who orders new NBS president Jordan McDeere (Amanda Peet) to come up with a solution to fix the show.

Her idea? Hire back the show's original head writer and producer Matt Albie and Danny Tripp (Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford). Both were let go four years earlier. Now, they have become famous in the movie biz (Matt has just won the Writer's Guild award), but McDeere knows that she can get Danny to come back to the show because she knows his secret (it involves cocaine). Will Matt and Danny want to come back to the show that kicked them out?

I'm not giving away any spoilers to tell you that, duh, of course they come back to the show. But it's how Sorkin gets them back and how the cast plays off of each other that's so much fun. Perry and Whitford are a marvel together (you really believe they're best friends), but anyone who saw them together in a few West Wing episodes know that. And the supporting cast? In any other show, people like Steven Weber, Sarah Paulson, and D.L. Hughley would easily be the leads. That's how strong this ensemble is. Add to those names Nate Corrdry and Timothy Busfield. That's impressive.

I'm also impressed at how Aaron Sorkin sets all of this up. Is there anyone else working in TV today that can immediately drop you into a world and make it seem believable, instantly? He did it with The West Wing, making politics entertaining and understandable, and he does it here too.

I sense two problems with the show, but they are more viewer-oriented than show-oriented. One, will people want to invest their time in a quality drama that you actually have to pay attention to every single moment and be able to keep track of a dozen characters with interconnected storylines (Danny has a cocaine problem, Jack is the one that fired Matt and Danny four years ago, Harriet is a Christian who once dated Matt, etc)? I'd like to say "yes" because of Lost, but this show isn't going to have mysterious hatches and action and smoke monsters and clues to follow. It's intelligent comedy, sparkling dialogue, and wit.

The second problem is, will viewers want to watch a TV show about a TV show? One that is really insider-ish about the industry and its history? I would say that people shouldn't be worried about that. It's not like you need a TV encyclopedia next to you to understand what's going on, though it helps to be a fan of television and some of its classic moments. Ultimately, thought, this show is about the characters, the relationships. And even though it's in the "drama" category to the right, this is as much as workplace comedy (The Office, NewsRadio, Dick Van Dyke Show) as it is heavy drama. It's a great mix.

I still find it amazing that everyone from TV bloggers to The Washington Post's Tom Shales is still pushing the idea that a show like this might not work because unlike The West Wing they can't deal with big, important issues. One, they are (censorship, religion, drugs, the media), and two, Sports Night was set at a sports network of all things, and they dealt with important issues all the time, and very well.

And why is everyone shaking their heads that NBC has two shows (this show and 30 Rock) on the air about the behind the scenes goings on at an SNL-like show? So what? CBS can have 12 CSI shows and NBC can have 35 Law and Orders, but two shows about the same thing is too much!

This show is typical Sorkin: smart, fast-paced, idealistic, and, ultimately, romantic (and more than a little autobiographical). By the end of the first episode, when Matt and Danny have a heart to heart in the back of fake cab on the set and Jordan tells them they can do a controversial sketch on next week's show, you'll be rooting for Matt and Danny to come back and take SNL Studio 60 to the top. And, at the same time, rooting for Aaron Sorkin to do the same with Studio 60. It's TV for adults, and there isn't much on TV for adults these days.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

54 Comments

Filter by:
Chris

My fiancee' and I watched this before it aired and we loved it! Naturally we watched the season premiere and then we watched last night although I still recorded it on the DVR.

I am a huge fan of the west wing, and I own all of the box sets. This show is right up there with it the wing, and I look forward to every new episode. I agree with some of the comments on here about this being the best new show on TV and definately the best thing going on Monday nights!

Cheers!

September 26 2006 at 1:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Branth

Enjoyed the show. Reminded me a bit of West Wing (which I like so ain't complaining). Not sure if the SNL "behind the scenes" storyline will be everyones cup of tea but stranger things have happened.

September 22 2006 at 9:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
scott mclendon

Dear Marisa,
I like sharp,smart dialogue as much as the next person,which is why I watch "House" and "Gilmore Girls".Quote to me one sharp,smart line from this turkey...

September 21 2006 at 12:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
scott mclendon

Only in Hollywoodland is it considered courageous and cutting edge to ridicule evangelicals and Catholics.What if Danny's sketch was called "Crazy Muslims"?
This turkey ought to be done by Thanksgiving.

September 21 2006 at 9:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott

Wow--so much love, so much hate! I guess the over-the-top "best show ever" kinds of comments that started off here may have led to the "it's a piece of ****" comments that followed.

Take a breath, everyone. It wasn't as good or as bad as everyone has said. I am a confirmed Sorkin fan, from his movies to both "Sports Night" and "West Wing", and I thought "Studio 60" was good, but not great. So far. It's only been one freaking episode, people!

The actors were all top-notch, especially Matthew Perry and also Timothy Busfield, who I hope we see a LOT more of. I thought Amanda Peet did fine, although I think she looks too young for the job (despite the real-life parallels). Bradley Whitford was just doing Josh in his sleep...I hope we see something different from him soon.

The directing was manic and confusing. The sound quality was pretty poor--it's the only show, since "West Wing" went off, that I'm constantly backing up on my TiVo and putting on captions in order to figure out what the heck is being said. It's probably a combination of sound quality and the way the actors are forced to rush through their lines. (More the former, since I never have this problem with "Gilmore Girls".) The set, from what I could see of it with the camera whipping around all over, was impressive.

The writing was pretty good. However, the commentary on TV (which I agree with) seems about 2 years out of date. And the Christian storyline seemed clunky and overdone, not to mention that Sorkin is beating the same dead horse that he did on "West Wing" (even though I agree with him, it's the same dialogue, over and over again).

I'm looking forward to more episodes, and hoping that we'll get to see more of the other characters and the inner workings of the show. Did it live up to the hype? Not really. But what could?

September 21 2006 at 9:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cold Chilli

I think 30 Rock will be 1/2 of what Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip becomes.


*I crack myself up.

September 20 2006 at 5:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Marisa

I agree that it's the best new show this Fall. The writing is very very smart. And that's the only problem I see with it. I am not convinced that people have any interest in smart, sharp dialog any longer.

But I hope they do... because Studio 60 is worth watching. And there are so few shows you can really say that about these days.

September 20 2006 at 11:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gaz

Quite frankly I don't think that you can label it "the best show" before it proves itself to be just that. I enjoyed it, thought it was slick and very professional, liked most of the cast, not Amanda Peet though, BUT if they don't use what they have to be edgy and even radical, instead of West Wing goes to Holliwood, then it might turn out to be a glorified wank.

September 20 2006 at 5:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David

Aaron Sorkin HATES the 700 Club. He has made fun of it in every show he has done. It wasn't his best work but even his worst work would be 100 times better than the other trash on TV.

And yes if there was an hour of Brad Whitford and Matthew Perry at the table at the Writers Award thing then I would still love it. Matthew Perry was amazing and prozes that Friends was a 10 year waste on him.

September 19 2006 at 11:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Son of Spam

Late to the game here, but I finally got a chance to watch it a second time and catch anything I missed the first time around.

I thought it was extraordinarily well written and acted (no surprises there), and my only problem would be that I found myself being distracted when watching Bradley Whitford...his tone, his glances... it all screamed "Josh Lyman" to me.

Case in point, the scene where he meets Amanda Peete's character for the first time...take him out of that hotel room and put him in his West Wing office and replace AP with Janel Moloney, I wouldn't have been able to tell what show I was watching. His one double take at one point there was spot-on Josh.

I'm not sure if I am just "over-Joshed" from last year, or if Sorkin actually wanted him to mirror the Josh character, or BW just doesn't have the range in this medium. I hope it's just me and I'll eventually get used to it.

It's not going to stop me from watching it, however, I just hope we eventually see an actual new character here, not just BW playing Josh playing Danny.

Man, I think I just over-Joshed myself by writing this post.

September 19 2006 at 9:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners