Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

How Lost changed TV, or... you know... didn't

by Brett Love, posted Sep 28th 2006 2:07PM
LostTV Squad reader Bebop sent along a link to a TIME article about how Lost changed television. It's an interesting read, but I don't really agree with most of it. To start, I think they are giving Lost way too much credit. People have had this idea that Lost changed TV before. That led to millions of dollars being spent to make Surface, Invasion, and Threshold. And where are they now?

A lot of the things attributed to Lost in the article strike me as optimistic at best, completely wrong at worst. For instance, they talk about how in 2004 "procedurals reigned". The idea being that somehow Lost cracked that nut. Well here we are in 2006, and in last week's top 20 shows you will find all three CSI's, two Law & Orders, Without A Trace, and Cold Case. And to add to this, compare the ratings for a repeat of CSI to those of a repeat Lost episode. It's not even close. Lost hasn't changed much in that regard.

The article also glosses over what I think may become an important part of the Lost story. It mentions how serials tend to bleed viewers as the casual fans leave, but never acknowledges that Lost spent most of last season doing just that. Sure, the show does have a devoted and active Internet fanbase, but big ratings numbers don't come from the Internet fanbase. There may be something to the argument that Idol played a role in those falling ratings, but that remains to be seen.

Buffy the Vampire SlayerThe subject of downloads and DVDs comes up as well. Now, I get that Lost is moving some disks and selling some episodes for Apple. The thing is, that is nothing that is uniquely Lost. The first TV show I ever purchased, on VHS no less, was the X-Files. And if you want to stick to the more modern DVD sets of seasons, there are plenty of shows with just as much, or more, claim to building that market. Look at what Firefly did. Or better yet, Buffy. You can get each season seperately, a complete collection, or special theme collections. And both of those were selling like hotcakes before that Oceanic plane ever crashed.

Lost hasn't managed to corner the download market either. The Office does very well with their download sales. But that doesn't mean that they have reinvented or changed the sitcom. It just means that they are doing a good job, and The Office's fans like the convenience of the downloaded episodes, just as Lost fans do.

And in the end, that's my point. I'm not trying to put the boots to Lost or to say that they've got it all wrong. However, I think we need to stop short of blowing all that smoke up their asses. Lost is a very good show, and it has the potential to be a classic. It is still far too early to call though.

Getting back to those ratings, if you really want to talk about a show changing television I see two other directions that make much more sense. As I mentioned before, the fact that there are seven procedurals in the Top 20 says a lot. And it would serve as a good starting point for an article on how Law & Order changed TV. Or, consider that Dancing with the Stars is now two top 20 shows, and Survivor a permanent fixture on the list. Couple that with the fact that when Idol returns it will retake the top spot. There is your case for how Survivor changed TV.

The new season of Lost starts Wednesday, October 4th.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

20 Comments

Filter by:
Christopher J. Arndt

Felicity paved the way for Lost more than 24 ever could.

October 05 2006 at 1:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Alex

To the author. Survivor didnt change TV.

The Idol format exsisted in the UK a while before...

September 30 2006 at 4:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike McNamara

I agree that I'm not sure the Time article is entirely accurate. But though other shows may have done things similarly, Lost doing so was more important. Why?

Simple.

1st season: 16 million average viewers
2nd season: 15.5 million average viewers

As much as I've loved Alias, Buffy, and 24 -- and may even prefer all of them to Lost, they would never, ever be considered the 2nd most watched show in the world. Sure, I'm not sure how much something like that should matter when CSI Miami is considered #1 but it's still says something. My friends watch all the shows mentioned, but my grandparents and aunts and uncles watch Lost.

And that's why the things that Lost is good at or does that other shows may have also done is just lots more important because Lost did it.

Though a lot of the shows that were more direct copies of Lost may have died out last season, I think "the Lost effect" can still be seen in that networks may be more prone to try something that's unique (Ugly Betty is a good example) or isn't as worried about having to dumb stuff down as they used to be. (Remember how worried ABC was that nobody would understand Alias after the Super Bowl.)

September 28 2006 at 10:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jeff

I'm a 24 fan as well as a Lost nut, but I'm not sure 24 paved the way for Lost in any sense. 24 might have created a new and interesting format for serialized show, but its not like 24 invented the genre.

I do agree with the article's point that Lost is "post-tv" in that discussion on the web and its availibility as a download make it unlike other shows.

September 28 2006 at 9:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
superbagman

Let's see, how did 24 change tv before Lost...hmmm, I dunno, maybe because 24 was on tv THREE years before Lost came along. 24 was the show that proved that serials could be successful in the mainstream, waaaay before Lost ambled along. It really scares me how programmed the Lost fanbots are these days, it's like a cult.

September 28 2006 at 9:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
LostLucky

Try to post again...

September 28 2006 at 8:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
LostLucky

I have to agree that X-Files really started a lot of the trend, but Lost figured out a formula that seems to be working and to have broken sci-fi out of its core male group. Lost also has opened up Hollywood's eyes to how to create a web buzz, despite the tepidity of the web game over the summer. Luckily Rachel has found her dad and all is good. A site I have been following that seems to be catching on with Lostaways is at http://www.LostExposed.com/ - it has news, blog feeds, a forum with clues blog.

September 28 2006 at 8:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jeff

I'm not really sure I understand how 24 changed tv (or lost for that matter). Like Brett said, most of the networks schedules are filled with procedural shows. Maybe law and order changed the face of televison, but there were still procedural shows before it. 24 and lost have given serial dramas a greater chance of making it to air, trying to copy their success, but as we've seen few have made it.

September 28 2006 at 7:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cinesister

First thing I thought when I was reading this: 24 changed TV, what the hell are they talking about Lost for?

Glad I wasn't the only one having that thought. :)

September 28 2006 at 6:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kelly

I sawthe very first episode... Never saw another one... It was just one of them shows I couldnt get into. Sorry

September 28 2006 at 5:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners