Powered by i.TV
February 11, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Gilmore Girls: That's What You Get, Folks, For Makin' Whoopie

by Joel Keller, posted Oct 3rd 2006 9:55PM
Gilmore Girls: That's What You Get, Folks, For Makin' Whoopie(S07E02) Holy out-of-character, Batman! This is what fans were afraid was going to happen during the new Rosenthal regime: a slowish episode where people do and say things that no one has ever seen or heard them do, punctuated by forced "classic Gilmore" dialogue that neither flowed right nor made much sense in the context of the episode.

I've got to say, I was immensely let down here, in more ways than one. How many ways, exactly? Well, right now I can count five:

1. Predictability - As soon as the cold open started and we saw Luke driving in his truck with a map in his hand, we knew exactly what was going to happen.

I mean, the thought that popped into my head was "Oh, so he's going to go punch Christopher now?" And that's exactly what he did. Nothing at all unpredictable happened; Christopher didn't duck, he didn't come back at Luke, Luke didn't cock his fist then think better of it, nothing. He just got off the elevator, knocked on Chris' door, punched him, then got back on the elevator. Then the credits rolled. Not good. Also, something else happened in this scene which leads me to problem number two...

2. Dumb behavior - Why didn't Chris look through the peephole before he answered the door? You'd think if he did that and saw Luke there, he wouldn't have bothered to even turn the knob. But I guess that would have killed the oh-so-unpredictable cold open, right?

Another issue was how idiotic Luke sounded when he encountered Lorelai as they were crossing the street. "I'm OK," he said idiotically. "So we're not getting married; I guess I don't think it's as big a deal as you do. I mean, you were the one who proposed." As much pain as Luke was in, I don't think the Luke of the Palladino era would say something stupid, even if he was just trying to protect himself and hurt Lorelai.

Of course, he realizes later, when he's with T.J. and Liz, that the two of them weren't right for each other, but when he just "happens" to see Lorelai in the frozen foods section of a huge supermarket, he goes ahead and tells her that, too. "You can just go back to being Lorelai Gilmore and I'll just go back to being the guy behind the counter who pours you your coffee." I don't know. It just seems too easy. It's only been a couple of days, but even a hard-shelled guy like Luke would be more sensitive than that, no?

Oh, and T.J.'s just an irritating idiot. But he's always been like that. I just wonder why Luke isn't taking the insurance money and getting a real contractor to do the work on the diner rather than have him and T.J. do it. I guess if he did that, we wouldn't have an excuse to bring back Liz and T.J....

3. Lane has been replaced by a lame Lane-alike - Lane was always one of the most underrated characters on the show, because of her alt-bubbly enthusiasm, her love of music, and her constant fight to not be like her mother. Then she gets married and becomes her mother. She has clumsy beach sex with Zack and she decides that she hates sex and that every woman who has said sex is good is part of a conspiracy. Then she gets pregnant (Lucky shot, Zack!) and frets that she won't be a good mother. What happened to the confident Lane that we saw as recently as last season? I want to see her back.

4. Extreme Gilmore-ness - I'm talking about when Lor decides to decorate her house in a kitschy Asian motif; she did so to make Rory, who wanted to go to Asia with Logan, happy, but it looks like she was running an Oriental novelty shop out of her living room. Don't get me wrong, Lor and Rory have ventured into this kind of nuttiness before, but it seemed to be a little much here, especially when they had the whole discussion about "dessert sushi". Something about it didn't flow right, and it just brought the scene to a halt. When Rory finds out about Chris and Lor -- Chris leaves a message as they're watching a Bruce Lee movie -- the moment doesn't have the emotional punch it should have, maybe because it was in an odd spot. Or it could have been because of Alexis Bledel's limited acting range; I'm not sure.

I did like the picture of Sandra Oh right next to the one of Mao. Why was she up there? "Well, she's a goddess," says Lorelai. I wholeheartedly agree.

5. No Richard and Emily - Not even a mention of them. Granted, they're not in every episode, but just the mere notion that they're involved in every decision Lor makes, whether she thinks so or not, just isn't evident here. That opposing force is necessary for the show to drive in the direction it does; without it there, it's aimless. And, also, the snappiest dialogue often comes during the scenes between Emily and Lorelai; the absence has been palpable in the first two episodes.

I do think what Liz told Luke, that he and Lorelai were never really in synch, was necessary. It sounded like Rosenthal and the writers addressing the fans through Liz, but at least someone had to acknowledge that Luke's behavior when April came into his life wasn't normal. The "space-time continuum" stuff (and T.J. pulling "string theory" out of his ass) was just a goofy bow on the package. But I knew as she started talking about Luke and Lorelai being on "different planes," she was going to mention The Lake House. So maybe this should go under item one on my list.

The only thing I really liked about the episode was Kirk's opportunistic business venture: Kirk's, an outdoor diner that looked suspiciously like Luke's, down to the backwards cap and flannel shirt Kirk was wearing. The scene was too long, but at least it was funny. That's more than I could say about the rest of the episode, which moved with a pokiness that I haven't seen on this show before. It was written by Rebecca Rand, and I wonder if Rosenthal did any major rewrites like AS-P used to do. It doesn't seem like it; the rhythm of the episode was just off from the beginning, which is something Rosenthal would have probably fixed given the chance.

We'll see how the rest of the season goes; Christopher will come back in the picture next week. But the optimism I had about the seventh season last week is starting to waver a little.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

28 Comments

Filter by:
David

And could they have choosen a longer or worse name for an episode? I don't think so.

October 10 2006 at 1:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Amanda

I think you are being a little too sensitive about the changes in the show. I love the show to and am very attached to the characters, but I also realize that the characters need to "grow" and change every season, in order to keep the show interesting.
Some of your points were valid, but some weren't. Luke hitting Christopher. I think that is what he should have done. Chirstopher never hid from Luke before, why should he start now. And Lane's changing is completely valid. If you think getting married and finiding out your are preganant after your first time (which was awful) wouldn't change a persons views, then you should try it sometime.

October 10 2006 at 12:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott

That's it for me. I've watched since the first episode. Had this show sitting on my TiVo for almost a week. After the season premiere, I really didn't even want to watch. But I gave it a shot. Miserable. Why they insist on shoving TJ down our throats I'll never know. I started fast-forwarding right through his scenes last year. And there was nothing else in the show to really keep my attention. No Richard & Emily again. More "cuteness", more "Lor/Luke/Chris" soap opera.

I'm done. I'll stick to my memories of the show from better seasons. There's too much good TV on these days to hang on to something just because I used to like it. I don't blame the new team exclusively--the Palladinos had already worn the show out in the last year or two. I deleted my Season Pass. No more.

October 09 2006 at 12:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Addie

Let's not forget that it was the Palladinos that left this show in such a mess. I agree that this is not the same show that we all fell in love with, but last season was was nowhere near as good as the first five. I think this season's second show was more promising than the first one, but AS-P's dialog was so unique that I don't think it can be duplicated. I'm afraid that the most we can hope for this season is that the shows will be good, not great.

October 05 2006 at 11:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David

I'm so so glad I stopped watching the show years ago. it's never a good thing when the creators ditch the show after wrecking the show and then the show gets even worse!

October 05 2006 at 8:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dave

Lets start out with the one true and honest moment in this episode, it was the last one with Rory comforting Lorali and some ice cream. This is GG of old ( Rory and Dean breakup after he told her that he loved her ). Lorali told Rory that she needed to feel her pain, cry and eat a gallon of ice cream.
All of you had some very good points and GG is different, some good and others sad, what bothered me the most was to hear words that were purposefully said to be mean and hurtful.
When Jess crashed Rory's car and Lorali told Luke "go to hell" he then said "right back at you" , those were harsh words but they didn't come off mean. This is were the loss of AS-P will be missed the most for me.
Her writing took these raw emotional moments and turned them into magic or love, none of the Gilmore's know how to love and maybe AS-P didn't know how to either and writing was her only way to show how she really felt, in away Gilmore Girls has lost it's soul.

October 05 2006 at 12:46 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
floosiesuzie

I was very disappointed in the show. "Flat" is exactly how I would discribe it. Lauren Graham doesn't seem to have her heart in it this season, and I not happy with the fact that Logan is still in London and he and Rory have am almost non-existent story line. The show is just boring and a tremendous disappointment. I'll keep watching for a while, but I'm close to giving up on the show and reverting to my DVD's of days gone by for the Gilmores. I'll truly miss it!

October 04 2006 at 11:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Lindsey

i miss the simplicity of seasons 1-5. there was something so simple, yet complicated at the same time about this show. It had heart, love, joy, drama, laughter, pain, friendship, wit, family, and was a great show. Then, it lost it's spark. All the characters have changed in some way, and not for the good.

I know, i know, they're supposed to change because they're getting older and change is a part of life, but this change hurt the show. The Rory/Lorelai relationship is off and doesn't have the same spark/chemistry that it used to have. The feel of the show is darker now, something i never expected from GG. The storylines are darker, the characters are darker and the show is different. Iit's like seasons 1-5 are one show, and seasons 6 and 7 (so far) are the spin-off that is struggling and that will never be as good as the original.

The L/L friendship had been ruined, the townies have been underused and abused at the same time, and the Gilmores have become secondary storylines infavor of the love lives of Rory/Lorelai. This show was about family and friendship, and both have been replaced by the Girls' love lives, and the show is lacking.

The Lorelai/Rory relationship seeems forced and i believe the writers are trying to hard to return GG back to it's former glory of Seasons 1-5, and that will never happen.

The episode was off because the show is off and has been for the past year. Right now, i'm just hoping that the writers are able to improve, a lot, and at least go out with some dignity. I hope this is the last season because i doubt that the show will be able to stand another season without complete and uter destruction, and that's where it's headed right now.

October 04 2006 at 8:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Noƫle FIlius

My humble opinion: Liz missed a golden opportunity to call Luke on his crap when he confided in her last Thanksgiving about April and tried to convince himself by trying to convince her that "Lorelai did not need to know" and Liz kept silent. Her opinion now is too little too late but I am sure that this is all for the sake of the plot. Luke and Lorelai were very much on the same plane until season 6. Again it was the Palladinos' choice to put them on different ones and David S. is going along with that as if he never saw the previous seasons where their chemistry exploded on screen.
Again for the sake of the plot(story) nobody is giving either one of these two people - who are deeply in love with each other - the advice that they need to get back on track. Sookie is her best friend and yet she is not addressing the matter with Lorelai as a true friend should. Maybe that will come later. Good for Rory to speak her mind for once, but I don't trust her because she has given terrible advice to her mother in the past, like when she told her to conceal from Luke her tequila evening with Christopher.
Lorelai is in dire need of therapy and before she runs to Christopher she should run to a psychiatrist, not a psychologist and certainly not the one who gave her that ill advice in the back seat of her car. Luke to some extent needs that too. But that is not convenient for whatever the writers have in mind so it won't happen.
The writers are putting stupid words and therefore all the wrong words in the mouth of Luke but that is not new, the Palladinos have done the same on many occasions. Luke could be such a great guy, it's right under the surface and some fan fiction has exploited that to create beautiful compelling stories even about the current events, but the writers are making him dumber and dumber, it's a wonder what Lorelai would find attractive in him the way he is portrayed. I am a Luke fan and therefore a L/L fan and I am beginning to be turned off. It's as if it was the aim of the writers to make Christopher a more attractive prospect for Lorelai than Luke. They never portrayed Christopher that way, a little weak maybe, that's all and therefore he is gaining a following. If that's the plan than it is definitely a totally different show and it's anybody's guess if the Luke fans are going to stick by that storyline and buy it whole. However different Luke and Lorelai are there are more sparks between them then between Lorelai and Christopher. At least it used to be the case. It's their show and so far our loss.

October 04 2006 at 7:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tamara

For me what ruined this episode is the two Gwenyth Paltrow references. You can't have double references!

All of this aside, I watched this episode and the second episode of last season at the same time. They were the same (other than GG are talking to each other this season). The changes can't happen overnight and Rosenthal is just continuing what was there. Now, just wait until the dramedy clock turns to Halloween and leaves this week we've been stuck in for three weeks.

October 04 2006 at 2:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners