Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip: The Wrap Party

by Bob Sassone, posted Oct 23rd 2006 11:35PM

Studio 60 logoI'll get to the review in just a moment, but first, a few facts about Columbus, OH:

  • Population: 695,709
  • 15th largest city in the U.S.
  • One of the fastest growing metro areas
  • Named by Money magazine as one of the Best Places To Live in the U.S.
  • Economy is ranked 7th strongest in the U.S.

With that information, why did Aaron Sorkin choose it as an example of some hick town?

Tom's parents come to town, from Columbus, and they've never heard of Abbott and Costello's "Who's On First" and they treat Simon like it's the only black person they've ever seen. I found this to be incredibly odd. This is Columbus, OH we're talking about here, not Mayberry, and I'm not sure why Sorkin would be that city to have Tom's parents be from, clueless and old-fashioned. Hey, do you think they have the internet there? Tom's dad is also ticked that Tom's brother is actually doing something important with his life: he's a soldier in the Afghanistan.

Having said that, this might have been the best episode yet. It wasn't just smart and well-put together, you could practically feel the heartbeat of the show coming from every scene.

I've liked every episode of this show, but this episode had that West Wing/Sports Night thing going on more than most of the episodes so far. A main plot (the wrap party for the show that gets all the characters in one room so they can bounce off of each other and mingle) that drives the show along, and a couple of subplots that eventually tie in to the main plot, giving all the stories (and the characters) a bond. If not a physical one you can see on the screen, then one that the viewers can sense at home even if the characters on the screen don't. I also love how Sorkin assumes we're all smart and we're going to know (and care about) people like Clifford Odets and Sid Caesar (shades of that episode of Sports Night about Philo Farnsworth).

An old man is found stumbling around the studio. He seems to be lost and confused, but Cal doesn't want to throw him out, because he senses there's something going on with him. Now, I guessed what his story was right away (an old writer from a classic NBS variety show in the 50s, brought down by the McCarthy blacklist and coming back to get an old photo), but that didn't matter. This was great character stuff, and classic Sorkin: characters who actually give a shit about people and care about the past.

A lot of viewers have been complaining that one of the reasons this show is falling in the ratings is because they've given no reason why we should care about a bunch of people who write for a TV show, like we cared about the people who made important decisions on The West Wing. Well, there are different kinds of importance in the world, and if you didn't feel for this guy and really dig this story, you don't have a heart.

While all of this is going on, Simon confronts Matt about not having any black writers on the staff. Matt tells him that it's not his staff, Ricky and Ron hired everyone before he came back. Simon wants to take Matt to the Improv to see a hot comic. When they get there, the comic is just riffing on the same black/white issues that many comics do, and Simon is disgusted that a fellow black performer would just push the same old sterotypes of blacks. They're going to leave, but decide to have a drink at the bar first. While talking, they overhear another black comic on stage doing some smart, subtle observations, and getting boos and heckles from the audience. They hire him on the spot.

Jordan, who comes to the party not only to mingle but to make friends because she doesn't have any, wants Darren to sign a baseball for her, to give to her nephew. While he's signing it, he asks her if she likes the sex clubs like he read in the papers. Yup, turns out Darren's a creep, and he actually writes his phone number on the ball. Harriet wants to see what he wrote on it, but after Jordan stalls, Harriet guesses what he wrote on it. She's bummed but not shocked. She realizes that Darren is the anti-Matt.

Tom sees his parents off in the parking lot. His mom is hugging him goodbye and telling him to take care of himself, but his dad is standoff-ish. Until Tom gives him an album (an album!) of "Who's On First."

Cal brings Matt and Danny to meet the old man in the writer's room, and the man talks about the people he used to write with in this very room. He mentions a woman writer that was on his staff, and says that he thinks that the only reason he got anything on the air was because he was writing for her. We see Harriet walk by in the background, and a look of recognition come over Matt's face (classic Sorkin). The episode ends with Matt, Danny, and Cal listening to the old man's stories of the old days in television.

Studio 60 is pre-empted next week for a one-time trial in the slot by Friday Night Lights. It will be back in two weeks, but if this show is canceled, that would be a shame. Because I don't just think this is a smart, wall-to-wall entertaining show, I think it's a show we need on television. I said above that if tonight's plot didn't get to you, you don't have a heart. Let me also say that if you actually hate this show and don't think it should continue, you don't have a brain either.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

69 Comments

Filter by:
scott

Cancel the show, and I will never watch this network again...gotta make a stand somewhere.

November 01 2006 at 2:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Batton Lash

Listening to Steven Weber's character rail against "Nations" made me
think that was inspired by a NBC exec's reaction to a pitch for "The
West Wing". Whatever drawbacks "Studio 60" has, it is fun to"decode"
each week's episode (I like how an previous poster speculated that the
"offensive" comic may have been a parody of D.L.Hughley's earlier
stand-up work).

October 27 2006 at 4:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Pete

I agree that this episode was best. The problem with the show is it is really intelligent tv. Many people don't get it or like it. I read another review that mentioned how the first episode blasted network TV for "pandering to the least common denominator" and yet this show might have to do just that to survive. I thought the production number based on HMS Pinafore in episode 2 was hilarious and having musical guests like Sting could continue to help ratings if they still wrap the intelligent and interesting plots around those things. I hope it lasts.

October 27 2006 at 1:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
schubash

Finally... it's starting to cook. I really enjoyed the first two episodes, but it hasn't come together and been seriously good until Wrap Party. I'd like to email Sorkin's agency and or some such and say so because I'm not in a "Nielson Household" and it never seems that people like me are. If they keep making 'em like this, the show will make it. Maybe not in it's current time slot/day, but - if new viewers tried the show this week, they'll be back.

October 26 2006 at 9:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Don Zacharias

Tom not connecting with his parents about Who's On First was completely tone deaf. I'm no comedy expert, but I'm sure a large percentage of people over 50 can quote a few paragraphs of that routine, and almost 90% probably have fond memories of it. People like Tom's parents would not get Richard Pryor or something. It sounded like a 15 year old who just discovered Abbott & Costello wrote it. Bah, this show is losing me.

October 25 2006 at 4:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ZipperSeven

They should have said Columbus, Nebraska. Small town in the middle of nowhere. Prototypical Smallville anytown.

Trust me. I was born there.

October 25 2006 at 4:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chronos467

I was excited about this show and have really tried to like it; but so far I'm lukewarm. I like the actors and I agree that this episode was by far the best one. My problem other than the brilliant Matt writing skits that are embarrassingly unfunny, is how condescending it is. That's been my problem with Sorkin in all three of his series. Sorkin can't make an episode without taking shots at the obviously (to him) ignorant Christian right and making some hamfisted political statement. C'mon, how can anyone not know the "Who's on first?" routine? Especially people from that generation! Little Rock and Columbus are obviously viewed as cow towns where people have been living in a hole and reading their Bibles for the past century. I guess there is no civilization in this country outside of New York and Los Angeles.

Plus the whole tone of self-importance. It's a late night comedy show! Why does the network president have nothing better to do than worry about what's on that show and hanging around making friends with the actors?

I like the scene at the comedy club and it echoed my problems with a lot of black comedians; however, it would've been much more believable if they had not made the educated guy that they hired not so achingly bad. He wasn't doing comedy; he was preaching.

October 25 2006 at 3:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jim

Everyone's so caught up in defending the honor of Columbus, Ohio that we're missing the real flaw in the "Tom's parents" story thread.

It doesn't matter where they're from; the "hard-hearted Dad who pours contempt on one son because the other one is (living a more standard life with 2.4 kids/in the military/already died in combat)" paired with the "mousy, nervous mother who wishes her family were more loving but is afraid to say three words in a row" is one of the oldest, most tired standbys in drama. And, as on Monday night, it's usually brought out with severely exaggerated traits. This is a construct that no one has ever handled with subtlety.

That said, I also thought this episode was mistitled. It should have been called "Holy Shit, Is That Eli Wallach?"

And never mind how many people in Columbus have heard of Abbott and Costello. How many of Monday's viewers have ever seen "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly"?

October 25 2006 at 11:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tammy

I was thinking about why Sports Night was so good and I think part of it was the fact that other than one or maybe two actors, none of them were really famous our had majorly famous shows prior to Sports Night. Sure some of them went on to star in other shows and get nominated for Emmy's but not while on Sports Night. It was smart, well written and well acted and you bought into a bunch of people following sports stories and putting on a sports show.

Now you have Matthew Perry, Amanda Peet, Bradley Whitford, etc. and some of them are larger than life when it comes to this show. Alot of people tuned in to see Chandler Bing or tuned in because they thought it was supposed to be funny since it's based on SNL. When it wasn't what they expected, they tuned out and didn't give it a chance. It's a drama and everyone is complaining about the comedy. I do agree that Lauren Graham should have been Harriet but oh well.

The show is good. It's well written even when Aaron gets heavy handed on us. The acting is solid. It's a great piece of television. Aaron needs to lay off the references back to his life some and just write. Unless you are a huge fan of his, you aren't going to get it and you won't think it's cleaver, just odd.

If NBC doesn't give this a whole season, they are stupid. With as many shows that are tanking on NBC, they need to hang on to this one.

October 25 2006 at 10:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Patrick Walsh

Countless articles have been written wondering why Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip is not a hit. I'm not sure why it's so hard to figure out. Take this exchange from last night's show. And as you read it, put yourself into the shoes of someone who's lived his or her life in Columbus, Ohio. Raised a family there. Has a job there. Is happy there.

TOM: My parents don't know what I do for a living.

SIMON: Are they alive?

TOM: Well, they live in Columbus, Ohio. So...barely.

Hmmm. Why doesn't "Middle America" watch this show? Yeah, it's a mystery to me too.

Later on, when Tom's parents come to the set from Ohio, they regard Simon as if he's the first black man they've ever seen, with the mom telling him "My husband has a crush on Halle Berry!" Ugh.

Tom's mother takes an active interest in his life and asks him "How do you go about writing the skits?" He yells at her about how "Skits are something the football players do when they dress up as cheerleaders!!! I write sketches, mom! SKETCHES! A sketch is something that the greatest comedic minds in the country gather to write and perform for millions of people! SKETCHES, mom!"

No, I'm serious. That is actual dialogue from the show.

Ol' Tom also chews his parents out when they haven't heard of the Abbott and Costello routine "Who's On First?" He can't believe how out of it they are, how little they know about Comedy!

Come on. There is no way on Earth that two people over 50 years old are not familiar with this routine. There just is no way. I think most teenagers are familiar with this routine. Living in Ohio, even if you're "barely alive," you would have heard this growing up. Columbus isn't Amish country.

These characters are never redeemed, never made to look smarter or more tolerant than they are presented in these scenes. The viewer is essentially asked to side with Tom as he belittles his parents for not giving a shit about the difference between a "skit" and a "sketch."

Give me a break. Screw this show..

This "out of touch" couple is clearly supposed to represent all the people who (HORRORS!) don't watch this smug, self-important, ridiculous show. WHAT? They don't care about the inner workings of insanely unfunny comedy!? IDIOTS!

Our country is in a sort of low-key Civil War right now. The "blue states" vs. the "red states." Those two labels mean just about nothing, but they're the basis for all sorts of really uncomfortable "comedy" going on right now. All television and most of film is written in New York or Los Angeles. And a majority of people in both places seem to look at everyone not living in NYC or LA as being According to Jim watching, Bible-thumping, beer-swilling, racist, inbred rednecks. I've got to tell you, I met larger bigots in Connecticut than I ever did in Missouri.

How is a comedian rambling on about how stupid "Middle America" is any different than a white comedian talking about how stupid black people are? It's just as offensive a generalization, but somehow it's become acceptable, hip even, to bash away at anyone who doesn't want to live in a city where a beer is $9.00.

The reason for this divide is almost certainly George W. Bush. When he won the election for this second term, it really turned this country against each other, with "blue states" blaming "red states" for our country being driven further into the ground. Well, two points: 1) Just because a state votes red, doesn't mean everyone in that state voted that way. No one I know in Missouri did. And 2) Of course Bush is the worst, but it's not as though this race was Bush against John F. Kennedy. Both candidates were sorely lacking.

All magazines are written in NYC or LA also. And they do this shit as well. Every movie review of say, the Larry the Cable Guy movie mentioned "they should eat this up in the red states." Every review of Studio 60 says something to the effect of "Will the red states tune in to a well-written show with snappy dialogue that you really have to pay attention to?"

Yeah, they sure will. If the articles written about it don't ask insulting questions like that. If, you know, the show is good. If the show doesn't feature dialogue telling them how stupid they are. If the show doesn't live under the false assumption that there is nothing more important in the world than SKETCH comedy. Sketch comedy that so far has consisted of Christian bashing and impressions of Juliette Lewis and Holly Hunter that would have been dated when the first Bush was in the White House.

The promos NBC ran for this show when it was about to premiere showed Matthew Perry in a suit scolding a room full of sloppily dressed write

October 24 2006 at 10:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners