Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip: Nevada Day, Part 2

by Bob Sassone, posted Nov 13th 2006 11:34PM

Studio 60(S01E08) After seeing this episode (which just confirmed something I thought anyway), I'm not quite sure while people are so annoyed by the show's supposed liberalism and "east and west coast" mentality. This show is doing two things. One, it's sparking debate about a lot of serious issues (religion, gay rights, tolerance, politics), and two, it makes sure it dumps on liberals and Democrats and Hollywood just as much as much as they do flyover country, religious people, and Pahrump, Nevada. There's enough to go around on both sides.

I think a lot of viewers who don't like the show (and I truly don't understand why they're watching it week after week if they can't stand it) don't get the fact that just because the show dares to bring up the above topics, that it dares to even suggest that these topics are a hot-button issues and there might be a way to actually get along, doesn't mean that it's "against" anything.

While Tom and the gang are still in Nevada, waiting for the Assistant D.A. to arrive to the judge's office, Matt and Harriet argue about her comments to the NY Post, Jordan is having problems of her own about her "I don't want children" comments, and Dylan doesn't want to fill in for Simon on the news segment if he doesn't want make it back in time.

I'm not quite sure I'm really into this whole plot about Jordan and her ex-husband writing the tell-all about the sex. Seems like the cast has enough tension and pressure and scandal to deal with. Maybe this will be like the first season story of The West Wing where Sam dated the hooker. It was a fairly major plot in several eps that first year then never mentioned again. Maybe they put this plot in just to get the Macau father and dad into the plot, for a connection to Mr. White and a big deal for NBS?

Matt and Harriet are arguing about her comments to the Post, and it has gotten to the point where Jordan wants her to sit out her 6 week concert tour. But she doesn't have to, as the concert organizers cancel the gigs anyway, because of the publicity.

Lucy and Darius get to know each other while writing a sketch (oddly, none of the others are even around). The whole scene with Lucy crying to Matt about her ex-boyfriend was the worst scene in the whole show so far, but hopefully it's going somewhere.

There's a nice moment (a couple, actually) between Jack and Danny. Danny is trying to convince Jack to stick up for Jordan and stand behind her. When the daugther of the Macau businessman alerts him to the gossip about Jordan (on her Blackberry, of course), he wants to end the deal. This pushes Jack into a rant about how the man should go with Time-Warner instead of NBS. He sticks up for Jordan, Tom, even Danny. Steven Weber is doing nice work here, playing a business exec who sometimes can't help to someone also want to do the moral, right thing, even when he's trying to please his bosses and make money for the studio.

Back to my point at the beginning of this review: after the Assistant D.A. finds out that the reason Tom was speeding was because he was coming from Nellis AFB, where his younger brother was deployed from (he's on his third tour in Afghanistan - nice nod to the episode where Tom's parents visited the studio), the judge has sympathy for what Tom did, maybe even admires it a little, and shows that the guy wasn't just going to follow some typical stereotype and throw the cast in jail just because he doesn't like Studio 60. And Sorkin throws in a nice line from the judge about how they have to stop thinking that everyone between Fifth Avenue and Hollywood Blvd. is out of Hee Haw.

And as for Harriet and her comments, she actually defends herself really well to Matt at the end. I think the show is trying to say there's more middle ground than we think. Whatever it's trying to say, it's just great that a show like this is actually talking about the issues. This show could have been just a really predictable, by the numbers show about a late night variety show, showing sketches, having the typical set up-joke-set up-joke-resolution structure we see in a lot of comedies, or the one dimensional characters we see in too many dramas. It's doing something different.

And doing it really well.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

44 Comments

Filter by:
Andrew Pulrang

This was the best episode so far. Steven Weber's scene at the end was fantastic. One of Sorkin's talents is giving us characters we're supposed to think are the "enemy", then showing that in every villain, there is a "good guy" struggling to get out. I don't know if I believe that, but I hope it's true.

I agree that Sorkin's smugness and air of superiority is out of control in this show. Maybe it's because in The West Wing, we had reason to accept that they were "better than us" because they are high-level officials, while the gang on Studio 60 are entertainers. Sports Night was smart, without being superior.

If Sorkin can either solve or bypass the fact that the "show within the show" sketches aren't too funny, and inject some more humility and perspective in his characters, it will be a top-notch TV show.

November 19 2006 at 6:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ben Reich

Good questions, Dave.

I also had some questions. I would have expected that the second half of a 2-part show would tell us 1-if they landed the Macau deal (I was so confused if the Chinese man now appreciates Jack or hates him), and 2- was the Jesus sketch in the show???

November 16 2006 at 8:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dave

I have questions:
1. Why does Tom have a tatto?
2. How does that tatto tell the DA all that stuff about Tom's brother?
3. Why were charges dropped for speeding at 120 mph?
4. "the judge has sympathy for what Tom did," what did Tom do, speed, get a tatto, push a gay guy, visit the AFB his bother was deployed from (isn't Tom's brother in Afghanistan)?
6. WHY was he speeding, because he was upset?

November 15 2006 at 5:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
chris w

I really like this show. And the woman who plays Harriett(Sarah Paulson) is one of my faves(to those that "do not like her character"). Her skit as Juliette Lewis hosting "Meet the Press" in an earlier ep. was awesome. She is beautiful, her performances are superb, and she is a stand-out amongst actors who have less talent(performance-wise). Go guess on that statement people.

And #9..couldn't disagree more w/ your statements. Weber is good, Peet is good. And you thought SMITH was good? Nuff said...what a turd of a show that was.

November 15 2006 at 5:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Michael

I actually quite enjoy the scenes between Matt and Harriet, so I'm not sure why there's all this talk of them having no chemistry. Personally, though, my favorite part of this episode was the plot involving Dylan's reluctance to be himself (rather than a character). I really hope that he gets some more time and that the show focuses more on other character based issues.

November 15 2006 at 4:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
michael

Am I the only one who still doesn't understand _why_ Tom was speeding? "Because he was coming from Nellis AFB" doesn't explain why. Was there a giant monster at Nellis chasing him? Perhaps this shouldn't really matter to me, but it does.

November 15 2006 at 12:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
digital_15

Jeez, I've never found a compelling reason to post before but come on. This is television, some of you make the WW sound like it was written by Dos Passos. Many of the criticisms that you all are leveling at S-60 could easily have been leveled at the WW. Does the rat-a-tat-tat dialogue suddenly not work? Did you really believe that politicians talked like Josh and Donna? Please.

I think Aaron Sorkin is head and shoulders above the rest of the crap on TV. Sure it's hokey, sure it's simplistic but unless I'm missing something deep and meaningful in all those other great shows that for some reason slip my mind, I'll take Sorkin. And what's with all the jibes at the cast? I like Sarah Paulson more each week and Weber is just plain excellent. Give it a break, its entertainment and I for one think it's pretty damned entertaining. Just like Judd Hirsch said in the opener "turn the channel" if your so terribly disappointed.

November 15 2006 at 12:31 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
digital_15

Jeez, I've never found a compelling reason to post before but come on. This is television, some of you make the WW sound like it was written by Dos Passos. Many of the criticisms that you all are leveling at S-60 could easily have been leveled at the WW. Does the rat-a-tat-tat dialogue suddenly not work? Did you really believe that politicians talked like Josh and Donna? Please.

I think Aaron Sorkin is head and shoulders above the rest of the crap on TV. Sure it's hokey, sure it's simplistic but unless I'm missing something deep and meaningful in all those other great shows that for some reason slip my mind, I'll take Sorkin. And what's with all the jibes at the cast? I like Sarah Paulson more each week and Weber is just plain excellent. Give it a break, its entertainment and I for one think it's pretty damned entertaining. Just like Judd Hirsch said in the opener "turn the channel" if your so terribly disappointed.

November 15 2006 at 12:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chris Crosby

I will be happy as long as we keep getting more Dylan Killington.

DYLAN KILLINGTON, the overweight comedic actor who is afraid to read jokes from a teleprompter unless he is wearing a (Mexican?) Santa Claus suit while doing it! How did he get hired on the show in the first place? Was it a super-duper extra-special prize in a Cracker Jack box?

Incidentally, how did SIMON STYLES (I love these names) get the job as Fake News Anchorman of News 60? He doesn't look anything like a news anchor and he's got marbles in his mouth. Every time he speaks, it sounds like someone is cleaning a window.

In summary and in conclusion, more DYLAN KILLINGTON and more GAY STREET TOUGHS.

November 14 2006 at 11:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John

Liking Weber's character can only be done from the perspective of a woman's seat. This guy hasn't done anything good since Wings. Peet has NEVER done anything worthwhile that I can recollect, and Paulson has all the wide appeal (notice i didn't say "sex appeal") of a soggy grilled-cheese sandwich. I'm not anti-woman, i just think the two major casting choices of female roles on this show were horrible! Was no one else better available? If it's Sorkin, surely bigger female stars were clamoring to get in on it, right? Weber? Sorry, but up to Nevada part 2 episode, i could not care a lick about this character... which is probably not Weber's fault, but Sorkin's poor writing. And get this folks... a good writer (or even great one) doesn't necessarily translate to great writing always and in Every area. Steinbeck and Hemingway wrote a few steaming piles of dung. Sorkin will (or has) also. This one is definitely his turd. What does he know about late-night sketch comedy shows and what happens behind the scenes?

As far as still watching it and complaining? Well, i was giving it the benefit of the doubt (West Wing) hoping it would improve. Despite NBC ordering a full season of episodes, this turd is still a steamer and the ratings (even in the non-flyover states) prove that fact. No one's watching.

Those of you whom like the show should thank your lucky starts that NBC is willing to gamble on this show and Sorkin, because better shows have already died (Smith).

This one will too. And remember, ordered shows doesn't necessarily mean they'll get aired. ;-)

November 14 2006 at 8:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners