Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

Your daily "Bill O'Reilly is nuts" moment

by Bob Sassone, posted Dec 21st 2006 3:01PM

This is becoming almost a daily thing. But that shouldn't be a big surprise at this point. On last night's The O'Reilly Factor, the FOX News host said this:

"If FOX News is the dominant number one rated cable network, and our presentation appeals to millions, why are we hammered in the press? The answer, of course, is ideology.

We can't find one TV critic in the United States of America, not one who isn't a liberal or a registered Democrat. Most are committed liberals, who dislike us for giving conservative and traditional Americans a fair shot.

By the way, if you know of a non-liberal TV critic, please let us know because we always want to be fair and balanced."

I want to write here that he's so obviously wrong that it's crazy, but it's so obvious that it's not worth mentioning (oh, sorry, I just mentioned it). But I'm wondering why anyone at FOX - or any other news outlet, whether it's CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, C-SPAN, TNT, or Animal Planet) would even bother to take the time to check into whether TV critics around the country are liberal, conservative, or somewhere in between. And then to top it off, he makes gigantic statements like "we can't find one critic in the United States of America, not one who isn't liberal or a registered Democrat..." I'd love to know how they would check on such a thing. There must be hundreds of TV critics around the country.

Bill O'Reilly is either a liar, someone making an outlandish statement for attention, or a bad investigative journalist (and one that should be concentrating on other things than what party a TV critic belongs to or some "war on Christmas"). Of course, he's not a journalist. He's a guy with talk show on cable. That's all.

It's amazing that he says that he's fair and balanced and responsible and that his show is a "no spin zone," then he makes an outrageous statement like this. It's also proof that he wants to divide this country, into "liberal and conservative," "us and them," and "we're right and they're wrong." What, are conservative TV critics supposed to send him an e-mail to dispute his theory? I doubt many will, because if they watch his show and like it, then they'll want to keep this myth going and not contradict him. But I hope someone does contradict him. Of course, if they do, he'll just say "oh, we only found a couple" or 5 or 7 or 30 or whatever the number turns out to be. Then he can say in an update on his show, "so, we found some conservative TV critics and we thank them for responding, but the fact remains that 97%* of all TV critics are liberal and they hate us. That's a fact."

*Or whatever number he makes up.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

41 Comments

Filter by:
RAB

A guide to reading the preceding forty or so posts:

"Partisan" means "having an opinion I disagree with." "Liberal" means "being tolerant of things I am intolerant about." "Bias" means "the mere fact that someone has an opinion I disagree with means I am being persecuted! Please protect me from ever having to see someone voicing an opinion I disagree with!"

Here's a news flash: if you read a site where people express opinions about television shows, you might actually see people expressing opinions! Imagine that! Even opinions that you disagree with! Is that really so scary? Are you so delicate and easily threatened? Grow up, guys.

December 22 2006 at 10:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Semi-regular reader

Joel and company,

The point is not that readers want everything to agree with them, they just want to be able to read a great entertainment site without partisan politics.

You are saying, in essence, "just go somewhere else if you don't like our politics"

We are simply saying "please don't force us go somewhere else to get our entertainment fix"

On a free-speech soapbox standard, you are free to say anything you want. Nobody disputes that.

On a business and publishing standpoint, this view is idiotic. "Check out our entertainment news... as long as you are on the same side of a partisan disagreement that has nothing to do with entertainment" "Welcome, you glorious 50 percent of our potential audience"

Your stance is about as brilliant as when ESPN decided that sportsfans wanted Rush Limbaugh to be a part of their sunday football broadcast.

On a business point of view I'd suggest that you do what you do well, and keep the junior-high level one-sided partisan comments internal. However, as you stated, this is YOUR site and you can do what you like
no matter how idiotic it is. Just don't expect that readers like me will keep coming back.

December 22 2006 at 1:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jeff smith

Its not that Bob is super liberal, and we know he is, but he's not very good at what he does on this site. Prime example is his covering of "Jericho" this season. Go back and read his synopsis of each episode and you wonder if he even watched the show. Bob we know you hate O'Reilly and that's your right. But one question: Why are you watching him, quoting him and giving him coverage? Oh, its cause you dream of being John Stewart and on TDS. How sad Bob.

December 22 2006 at 12:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sam

News organizations are left-leaning. All bloggers are left-leaning. All websites discussing news organizations are left-leaning. All the blog's posters are left-leaning. Television is left-leaning. The Eastern Hemisphere is left-leaning. The sky is left-leaning. The grass is left-leaning. The sun is left-leaning. Butterflies are left-leaning.

December 22 2006 at 10:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mkiatotx

While I agree that only a small percentage of posts on this site are political, if you gather all those political posts together they are mostly (if not all) liberal. There is no balance.

I think that is what bothers the conservative readers.

December 22 2006 at 8:58 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
corbett

You know, all you whiners about Bob's posts and how they are all oh-so horribly horribly liberal - there is a solution... Don't read them. You see the by-line on the front page - right under the entry/subject title - and if it reads "Bob Sassone" just skip it.

For nick and anyone else who wants to whine that maybe, just maybe there are others who actually like Bob's entries. If it's not his entries like this, then all you want to do is complain about the shows he actually reviews like Studio 60 today or the West Wing in the past because those shows have such horrible horrible liberal slants. Get over it. Just don't read his entries.

Problem solved. (From a liberal with a serious liberal bias - and proud of it!)

December 22 2006 at 8:40 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bearxor

I agree with some of the posters, leave this crap out of the blog. Not only does this seem like it has nothing to do with the blog itself but all Weblog bloggers are left-leaning that there's absolutely no chance to get an opinion from the other side.

I think you guys took what O said way to seriously. You just don't get his sarcasm. Not shocking since you all think TDS is funny and great but it jumped the shark years ago.

Stop covering political commentary at all. This includes TDS.

December 22 2006 at 5:12 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Hank

I am sick of the entire us and them bs. Some of us don't like high taxes, are for abortion rights, believe in god, and believe that the feds should not be handing out money to religious charities. Oh, what hot-buttons did I leave out that I must bee either for all or against all?

I'm against the nanny state. I'm for religious displays in non-governmental buildings, no matter the religion. I'm against zero-tolerance. I'm for common sense. I'm against illegal immgration, I'm for legal immigration.

With all the bias in media, where the F do I fit in?

December 22 2006 at 1:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tucker

Oh, lord, posts like this always bring the nutbags out of the woodwork. I love the huge chip conservatives wear on their shoulders - if you're so damn right, then why do you feel the need to be overly sensitive? I mean, yeah, I'm a flaming pinko commie liberal, or whatever you want to label me, but I have a great deal of friends who are "conservative."

However, I can't think of a single person I know on EITHER side of the "fence" as it were, who give O'Reilly one iota of credibility. If you want to have a political debate, fine. If you don't like a political post or two about a TV personality on a TV blog that you claim to like, fine. But in the name of all things holy, unholy or otherwise, please do not defend a moron like Bill O'Reilly. Don't you people understand he is one of the chief reasons intelligent conservatives (and yes, I do recognize such a thing exists - O'Reilly being staunchly excluded from that group) get a bad rap. Please, don't make me lose ALL respect for you by defending this man.

December 21 2006 at 11:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
phil

Bill O'Reilly is shi*ting in his pants because ratings are down, Bush has lost touch with reality and may be impeachable for mental incompetence and because he and FOX are getting "hammered".

Hey Bill, instead of a "Ho, Ho, Ho" I give you a big "Boo Hoo Hoo".

Thank goodness Stephen Colbert isn't as stupid as you are.

You might also want to check out the Colbert and Decemberists green-screen challenge (now over, we hope). This report is great with interesting information, photos and YouTude and Comedy Central videos to view.

http://www.indierockcafe.com/2006/12/colbert-decemberists-green-screen-is-it.html

December 21 2006 at 10:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners