Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Ugly Betty: Swag

by Julia Ward, posted Jan 5th 2007 7:02AM
Ugly Betty SWAG(S01E11... or, is it 04?) Why? Why do networks do this? "Swag" was originally supposed to air as the fourth episode of Ugly Betty. Instead, ABC pushed it into the number eleven position. Brilliant strategy. Take a show that's part telenovela and air it out of sequence. The result was a poorly edited version of an otherwise entertaining episode. The tags that were filmed later with Betty, Christina and the janitor, along with the occasional "remember when such and such was happening" voice-overs, were clumsy and unnecessary.

Worse yet, the emotional logic came off as loopy. These characters have come a long way since the first episode, and seeing them in their older, more one-dimensional incarnations was disappointing. Having said that, I'm happy to turn my attention to the parts of the show that didn't appear to be part of the sloppy cut and paste job. And, as is always the way with Betty, they were both amusing and moving all at the same gosh-darn time.

This show has more feel good messages than a row of Hallmark cards and an issue of O combined, but it delivers them in such a sincere, pop, lefty manner that they're more likely to bring a tear to my eye than send them rolling. This week's big message - "Never give up." Or, the alternative message, "It's not how much you have. It's how you spend it." Had this episode aired in its originally intended slot, it would have been Exhibit A in Salon.com's article about Ugly Betty as class commentary. The crux of that piece is that Ugly Betty makes for truly subversive television not because its main character is an unattractive woman in a den of superficiality. Ugly Betty is fabulously subversive television because it's about class.

It's the economic differences between Betty's home in Queens and the Manhattan highrises where she spends her 9 to 5 that makes the show so damn relatable. Betty exchanging her company swag - a $4,200 Gucci purse - in order to pay for her father's heart medication when his HMO refused to cover the cost wasn't needlessly melodramatic. It was real. That kind of decision - what needs to be sacrificed - is very much part of my own life and the lives of those around me, and I certainly don't see it depicted on TV very often. I even appreciate that we get to see Betty, knowing she made the right decision, cry over losing the purse because it "made her feel pretty." Betty's not above wanting to feel attractive, which is another reason I love the character. She's a human being not a saint.

Now, on to what makes the show tolerable to those without a love of the drama - the comedy. This week we got the bastard child of Karl Lagerfeld and Issey Miyake. Pretty funny stuff even if the minimalism jokes wore thin after awhile, but nothing's funnier than having Amanda offer Betty a Menudo box set and a coupon for 100 taquitos for her Gucci.

One more aside, did anyone else notice how many Weight Watchers and Slim Fast commercials aired during Ugly Betty? Did they decide that Ugly Betty's demographic was self-loathing chubby girls? That's sorta the antithesis of the show's message. Seriously, to quote Christina, "We all can't live on laxatives."

Wilhelmina Quip of the Week: Good luck returning my ass.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

7 Comments

Filter by:
Ryan

Yeah, it was clumsy but a clumsy (and more importantly NEW) Ugly Betty episode is still a treasure amidst rerun hell.

Plus I agree with George above. If they played this as the fourth episode, it would be the fourth episode where we get "a lesson" and it didn't really add a lot to the characters in terms of what the first three episodes gave us.

Also it was a bit nice to see HOW MUCH they've all changed. I just keep thinking "wow" throughout. Plus the bag/fashion/Betty crying brought me to tears. And of course the funny stuff (Amanda's Menudo offer, Wilhemina's ass, and Hilda begging Justin not to call his friends to tell them he has Burberry belt).

Oh this show... it makes me cry, it makes me feel good, and it makes me laugh. Awesome.

January 06 2007 at 6:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jennifer

At first I was thinking, "The fact that they delayed this and did a lame flashback episode means it's the worst episode of Ugly Betty ever." Yes, backtracking to the one-dimensional stuff and Ignacio's insurance drama at this point was weak. But on the other hand, there was the bag stuff. And finding out that Daniel Meade is as broke-ass as Betty without his company credit card (wonder how the company took it when he charged five diamond rings at Christmas?). And while the White Castle thing was...a stretch... the show did manage to have its moments.

And Henry was in it, albeit without flirting. Since this appears to be the first time Betty ever met Henry (i.e. when she wasn't back with Walter), now I'm trying to remember if it was indicated if Betty knew Walter before he showed up in uh, the other first episode he was in.

And yeah, there's also Wilhemina's ass. "You can't take my ass back!"

January 05 2007 at 2:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
innamorata

The bits with Christina and the janitor were clumsy and I understand why it bugged you to see the characters act as their 'old self' so to speak but the genuine emotional moments that give the show its sugar didn't suffer from their spice imo.

Betty and Men in Trees are the hour long programs that bring a smile to my face even when I see the clichés and 'puppet strings" of the script so I am more forgiving of them because of that. At least for now.

January 05 2007 at 2:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
George

Superficially, the network's decision doesn't seem that foolish: within "normal" continuity, the original episode would have felt pretty repetitive. It did nothing to move the characters forward (other than the prescription meds thing), and the one mild revelation -- Daniel's financial situation -- was effectively undone by the episode's end. Better, then, to move the story forward...

On the other hand, taking the characters this far back in their personal history/arcs/whatever is bound to confuse viewers. Silly ABC.

Also, did anyone else wonder if Ashley Jensen had had some "work" done around her eyes?

January 05 2007 at 1:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Carlos P

The reason I came to TV Squad this morning was to see if anyone else felt the same way about last night's episode as I did. Apparently so, since Julia's entry mirrored my views completly from how perfect this episode would have been in sequence, how cheesy the voice-overs and narration was and yet how funny Amanda's taquitos offer was and Wil's "ass" quote at the end. I just hope that when it comes to DVD that the original cut is placed where it was originaly.

January 05 2007 at 10:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mari

I too enjoy UGLY BETTY very much. it's the only new show this season i wait for in anticipation.

This episode did have me a bit confused, but it was nice to see a new episode,even if they showed it out of sequence.

January 05 2007 at 8:10 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bebop

I was disappointed by the episode, it was really weak.

January 05 2007 at 8:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners