Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

House: Words and Deeds

by Tom Biro, posted Jan 10th 2007 10:18AM
House - Words and Deeds
(S03E11) Let me say that I couldn't be happier about the resolution of the Tritter plot line this season, because it was definitely getting under my skin, and based on comments that TV Squad readers have been leaving here for the last few episode reviews, that was the case for more than just me. That said, I can't say I was pleased with how Tritter handled things at the end, but we'll get to that later.

I'm also starting to feel - and not just with this particular show, but all of them that I watch - that DVDs have spoiled me, because the whole waiting over the holidays, and then two weeks off here, three weeks there, is a bit draining. But at least FOX isn't pulling a Lost with us, and we only have to wait until January 30 for the next installment.

Back to the brass tacks, though. I think that our level of frustration with Tritter and how that situation was going down was completely emulated in how Cuddy decided to end it all by perjuring herself and coming up with a solution to get House out of court and Tritter off the cases of her staffers. For a minute there, I almost believed her while she was in the witness box, but that would have been too perfect, wouldn't it? The court scene was definitely one that I was looking forward to, as we got a pretty good promo showing House answer his phone, which you knew wouldn't go over too well.

Aside from the fact that I'm guessing we'll hear a lot from people who know that ECT is still given as a treatment for various things today, including severe depression, and isn't only relegated to the "1940's" as House and his team were saying, I thought that looping in the concept of being "lovesick" with the 1940's, and solving it with a 1940's treatment. Also, I guess I hadn't heard about people losing their experiential memories when it comes to ECT, but hey, I'm not an MD for a reason.

Stepping back to Tritter's comments to House as the case closes, though. What was with him addressing House as "Dr. House" to get his attention, and telling him that he hopes it all works out for him and that he was wrong about him all along. If that wasn't a boldface lie or the worst written piece of dialogue ever then I'm not sure what is (though I'm more than happy to take suggestions). It just made the entire Tritter plot seem like a complete waste. What, we're supposed to believe that after the judge takes him to task that he's going to have a Ghost of Christmas Past thing happen to him and he would move on, suddenly a new man? I think not. Clearly, he had some ECT while House was out saving his patient in the middle of court.

When House apologized to Wilson for how he had been acting and treating his friend, I actually thought we were seeing a character evolution that wasn't one of the three young doctors for once. As it turned out, it was probably 50% part of his recovery, 50% part of his dastardly plan that included snagging drugs from the orderly in the rehab facility. And when Cameron gave him a huge hug, that might have been the first time I really felt like she might not be one to depart at season's end, another thing I'm more than happy to still take wagers on. Though I think the show could end up crippled should they let people leave. Well, unless someone dies.

Cuddy's jail cell speech to House about "owning him" may allude to something more. For a second, I really thought he was going to make a comment about being more than happy to impregnate her, should she ask. I still think that's a decent possibility, but you know they'd get interrupted by Stacy or Cameron or something, and that probably wouldn't end well. But I can see how her oversight on him could affect the show quite a bit, or at least will give us a whole lot of funny scenes with House in the clinic, where his problems with Tritter, his teenage stalker, and many others have entered the story lines of this show.

Are we at a "change point" in this particular season or series? Maybe, maybe not. It's never clear and sometimes this show has an X-Files thing where we just jump to something else from week to week, coming back at a later time. We know that House still has a meds fix, and it's not clear where he'll continue getting them from, but the judge seems to think it's okay. He's still limping, and I really miss when he was getting his running on in the park, but that may be gone forever. The one thing left is going to be a love interest - or serious lack of one - that might pop into the show this season. Any other predictions, now that we have a few weeks to banter about them?

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

27 Comments

Filter by:
Maura Taylor

AGAIN: people who are actually IN pain [as is Dr. House] do not get "high" off of pain killers/narcotic pain medications, as it simply [and SOLELY!] works to reduce/minimize their pain, and does not - in fact - produce a "euphoric" effect, as it might for someone who is NOT actually in pain, but simply taking it just TO get high....Therefore, it is probably NOT likely that House:

"won't be allowed, as House, to get off Vicodin until someone dies because he was just a bit too high."
as surmised by DeAnn on 1/17/07 [above]

due to the fact that he doesn't take it to get high, and it probably doesn't even have that effect on him at all - actually, a more likely scenario is that: they (Cuddy, Wilson, someone...) will somehow convince and/or force House to stop taking his Vicodin, and he will then be SO distracted by the excruciating pain he is experiencing, that he WILL end up killing a patient...Thus, a tragedy will probably occur not because House IS taking Vicodin, but as a result of his NOT being able to take it...!!

January 22 2007 at 3:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
DeAnn

I agree that they wrapped up the Tritter arc way too easily, and I also agree that it would have been fairly difficult for that orderly to procure Vicodin for House regularly and not lose his job. There are a lot of things in the show that are over the top, done for dramatic purposes and illogical, but I think most people put up with them because the show is so well written and the characters so well enacted by the cast. Hugh Laurie (congrats to him on his Golden Globe) is amazing, and I would bet that, as one person said, he won't be allowed, as House, to get off Vicodin until someone dies because he was just a bit too high. And how come nobody is commenting on the engagement of the actors who play Cameron and Chase? I bet their romance has been interesting behind the scenes at the show! And I am still hoping that Cuddy and House end up trying to swap some bodily fluids, only to be interupted by Wilson!

January 17 2007 at 11:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Lance

We have not seen the last of Tritter. To simply end the arc the way it ended is completely illogical for this, one of the best written shows on TV. I believe Tritter will be back; moreover I believe there will be consequences for his actions. At least, I'm HOPING there are consequences for his actions, which clearly were not out of a sense of duty, but personal. Tritter crossed the line, and what goes around, comes around.

January 16 2007 at 9:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Maura Taylor

I APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE FOR THIS LONG-WINDED WRITING - It's just that I get soooo aggravated every time they refer to House as - or imlply that he is - an addict...Also, it's personal to me, so that is probably why it gets on my last nerve so easily...

Although I absolutely LOVE this show, I too am bothered somewhat by the non-realistic incidents that occur on the show; however, most of these far-fetched plots are not annoying enough to make me stop watching the show...EXCEPT, maybe, the portrayal of Dr. House as a strung-out, junkie, Vicodin addict just beause he takes it for pain relief.

First of all, House is surrounded by other doctors, who purportedly know the difference between drug DEPENDENCS and drug ADDICTION (see below - definition from website, link at end); clearly, they do not...:

[starting below is quote from website]
Differentiating dependence from addiction is important.

People receiving maintenance opioid therapy for extended periods of time may require increased doses to alleviate their pain. They may develop tolerance to the drug and experience withdrawal symptoms if the medication is abruptly stopped (this is dependence).

Addiction is elevated narcotic abuse that becomes compulsive and self-destructive, especially concerning an opioid user's need to obtain the drug for non -pain-relief purposes.
[end of quote - and the link to it is directly below]
http://www.emedicinehealth.com/narcotic_abuse/article_em.htm
[now, my words again]
Secondly, if they DID understand this [very important]distinction, they would realize that House is actually NOT an addict; yes, he is physically dependent on his pain meds (Vicodin) - but to relieve his PAIN...!! That, however, is simply an unfortunate result of being on a medication that your body can become quickly dependent on - BUT, that in no way determines whether he is in fact addicted to the medication. Addiction is determined by factors such as: [1] psychological addiction (i.e whether the person psychologically craves the drug due to the euphoria, or high, that it produces), [2] whether the person is taking the drug solely for this euphoric effect, and [3] if the patient requires increasing amounts and/or strengths of the drug to attain the "high," which, in turn, usually leads to taking increasingly stronger types of meds (e.g. going from Vicodin to Percocet to OxyContin, etc.)...Furthermore, addiction has a myriad of anti-social components, which include activities such as: doctor shopping (going to several different doctors for pills - with each doctor being unaware of what each others is prescribing to the patient), as well as faking pain/ailments in order to procure the pills, stealing in order to get the drugs, as well as lying to - and stealing from - family members (lying about the fact that they are taking the meds/drugs, and stealing money - and/or items they can sell quickly to make money - to buy them) AND then buying the drugs "on the street" from drug dealers, as opposed to receiving legitimate prescriptions from a doctor...

Thus, based on the above-mentioned [partial] criteria for addiction, it is clear that House is not actually an addict - he is simply dependent on his meds for pain management...He does not lie about the fact that he takes them (in fact, he flaunts it!), he receives legit Rx's from real doctors, and for a real condition that actually causes [him] a great deal of pain...Also, he has not escalated to stronger medications, is functioning just fine in his everyday life (not missing work, is paying his bills, etc.), and doesn't seem to be exhibiting ANY of the other signs normally associated with drug addiction (i.e. there are seemingly no changes in personality, etc. according to those who know him - and knew him before he started taking narcotic pain medications). They have never shown House taking his meds for ANY other reason than the fact that he is in horrible PAIN...Even when he was supposed to be in the throes of a horrible withdrawal, he wasn't miserable due to the horrific symptoms of the withdrawal, he was actually going out of his mind because he was in so much PAIN, i.e.: when Cameron came to his house, she saw that he had cut his arm [on purpose] and was bleeding pretty badly - now, if he were an addict, he would have done this solely for the purpose of going to an ER to get pain meds from them [for to the cut] (and to relieve the effects of withdrawal)...However, House had actually done it b/c [he explained]: the body reacts to pain by dealing with the most acute type/kind that it is experiencing at any given time - thus, he cut himself in order to distract his brain from the excruciating [leg] pain he was in due to being off of his pain meds...!!!

So, if they wanted

January 16 2007 at 2:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Alicia

To whomever made the comment about 1 treatment of ES... it was 5 total.

I'm not happy with it either... and all I can say is, doing it for his well-being or not I would have run Wilson over with the buss he threw me under.

I can't wait to see exactly HOW House gets under his skin now.

January 11 2007 at 8:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Paul

I find it oddly hilarious that, as Dave H mentioned, the diagnosis "Scrubs" used in last week's episode to poke fun at "House" (Broken Heart Syndrome) was the same diagnosis on "House" this week. At first I thought it might not have been a coincidence, but since "Scrubs" started filming at the same time as other series but didn't begin airing until November, they probably filmed their "My House" episode long before this "House" ep was filmed.

They're still both my 2 favourite shows on TV.

January 11 2007 at 4:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Trina

I wasn't entirely happy with the way this arc wound up, either. It seemed too pat. I also wasn't crazy about the similarity between this arc and the Vogler arc from Season One--which I also felt had an unsatisfactory ending.

In a lot of ways, I think House is a series that doesn't really do that well with multi-episode arcs. I'll withhold judgment on that, though, until I've watched all of Season Two.

January 10 2007 at 8:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Keala

I'm not from the U.S. - and I am curious to know whether it is true as presented that House could have got 10 years for trying to procure a prescription illegally - that seems an awfully long time and pretty pointless to me.

Regarding the ECT - I think the treatment is more common than presented - though for seriously depressed patients, that cannot be treated otherwise - it seemed quite unrealistic in this case.

I like the way House acts just like an addict - no easy solutions. And I don't think we've seen the end of Tritter.

January 10 2007 at 6:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Anna

He couldn't have been taking Vicodin the whole time. He was detoxing rather prominently throughout the episode. I don't think even House would make himself throw up constantly in order to convince people he doesn't really care about (only what the judge and Tritter believed mattered). But according to the "twist" at the end, that's what happened. Garhh. Damn logical fallacies. And yet I keep watching.

January 10 2007 at 5:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Roy Crops

Dependance, (addiction) to all sorts of Meds, including implanted morphine dispensors, and stronger, is not uncommon. Getting MD's to pay attention, take you seriously, and risk censure if it is deemed inappropiate (still unlikely), IS a problem. Playing House's addiction as good vs evil, and having schock treatments erase your memory, and dwarfs, that aren't, well that's just Hawkeye gone bad.

January 10 2007 at 3:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners