Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip: 4am Miracle

by Jay Black, posted Feb 20th 2007 7:02AM
Is this the last review? Check back on a date TBD...(S01E16) I knew all week that this might be the last Studio 60 we'd ever see on NBC, so I had two really clever opening lines prepared. If this week's episode was terrible, I'd open up with: "Not with a bang, but with a whimper." If it was really good, I was going to open with, "Not with a whimper, but with a bang!"

I think it's obvious why I get paid the big blogging bucks.

So which line did I decide to go with? The answer after the jump...

Not with a whimper, but with a bang! Sorta! Except for the last few minutes.

This was a 90% great episode with an ending that was enough of a predictable sour-note to remind us of why this show has had trouble living up to its lofty expectations.

But let's deal with the good first, shall we? There was a lot of it...

Jordan and Danny and the Robot Baby. Funny and cute with a dash of sparkling dialog ("You don't drive a baby... ever" and "Now we know not to put it in a guillotine" being two of my personal favorites). I know a lot of you guys don't think that Jordan and Danny have chemistry, but this episode has to have changed your mind! They were great together.

Tom and Simon. Though I thought that Simon's speech about the warning labels on consumer products was a little lame and hacky, everything else between them was great. I don't think there's been a bigger laugh-out-loud moment in the whole run of the show than when Danny leaves the Robot Baby with them and the first thing they do is throw it on the ground. Simon forgetting who he seduced was pretty funny too.

Just a quick word about Nathan Corddry: he's been wonderful on this show. One of the (many) shames of this show dying an early death would be losing a weekly dose of Corddry. If you're a network executive and you're reading this, first greenlight my pilot idea (it's about a television blogger who is also an assassin and has a bionic eye that can shoot lasers), then give Nathan Corddry something else to do on television.

Matt and the lawyer. I have to agree with Matt on the glasses thing. My wife got them and then decided that she didn't need them. I think it's one of the greater tragedies of our marriage that we haven't been able to play "naughty office"...

We just took a left turn into creepyville, didn't we? Let me start that part again.

Matt and the lawyer. This was pointed out on the early review posted over at AICN, but it bears repeating here: it was really interesting watching the discussion about the link between writing and ratings. It certainly seemed like Sorkin was acknowledging his own culpability for the Studio 60 slide in ratings, didn't it? I don't think I've ever seen a television show make such a self-aware pronouncement regarding its own place in the TV universe. I thought it was a cool touch but also a little sad (considering that the show might not be back). What did you guys think?

The two of them had great chemistry together and I was really hoping that she was going to be the 4am miracle. A beautiful and funny lady showing up out of nowhere is just the kind of silver-lining moment that every guy hopes for when he goes through a bad break-up. (The prototype for this is Heather Graham in Swingers. When she and Mikey danced at the end of that movie, you kew that everything was going to be all right for him.) When the lawyer showed, I thought that the Russian-Roulette that was the Matt and Harriet relationship was finally going to splat against the wall like that teenager's brain.

But, no...

We get Harriet. Back. Again. Ugh. (If you haven't guessed, we're up to the 10% that wasn't so great tonight).

Listen, I need to say this: Harriet is still shrill and annoying. There's no way around it. I have nothing against Sarah Paulson. I think she's a fine actress who can do a really good English accent and who can also make a dolphin sound, but her character is death. If I were that kid in bed with her, I would have asked for a real gun so I could end the hell of being around her and all her silly drama.

(Another side note: I've said this before, but God does that movie they're filming look bad. Maybe it's because I'm not a big Rolling Stones fan. Or maybe it's because I have eyes and ears.)

When Harriet showed up at Matt's office and Matt muttered "The 4am Miracle", my first thought was to scream "Noooooooo" like when Luke Skywalker found out that Darth Vader was his father. Then I collected myself. My second thought was that the ultimate frustration that I have with this show is that there is so much great stuff there (like the other 90% of this episode) that is being weighed down by the anchor of their relationship.

Matt started the episode by talking about Coleridge's "Kubla Khan." I think he would have been better off talking about another poem that Coleridge wrote: "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner." Because Harriet is an albatross, both for Matt and the whole of Studio 60.

And yes, I am unduly proud of myself for that literary reference.


(Final sidenote: what happened to Matt's pill popping? They showed it in the recap at the beginning of the episode and then... nothing. Has he stopped taking pills? Or are we to assume that the pills have something to do with his writer's block. I'll be interested to see, if the show comes back, if this is a storyline we're keeping or if it's just going to disappear...)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

26 Comments

Filter by:
Pam

I have loved Studio 60 from the beginning and I thought this episode was fabulous. I think Matt and Harriet have great chemistry. The episode that showed in flashbacks how they met was a masterpiec. I think the show has low ratings because it is competing against an extremley popular show and the media (like many of you) has been very invested in looking for what is wrong with the show with a fine tooth comb. I hope very much that NBC will allow Studio 60 to return from hiatus and for a new season next fall.

March 11 2007 at 3:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dave

Sadly, it's like anything in any business - it has to be right at the time of launch. People don't like to change their minds. So, you can't launch something wrong (TV show, restaurant, amusement park, department store) and expect people to give you a second chance and come back later, after you've fixed it.

But, that's exactly what was needed here - Studio 60 was easily the most improved show I'd ever seen, but that first, so heavily hyped episode, was just so busy and so manic and without focus, that most people weren't gonna come back.

The Harriet character didn't help, certainly, and as much as I'd love to blame her, I gotta blame whatever forces were responsible for letting that first episode get executed that way.

The saddest part is, I love TV, and you had Matt Perry, Brad Whitford, Timothy Busfield, and Steven Weber in a show about *TV!* Man, I thought I was really gonna have something great to look forward to every week! And, I should have!

February 24 2007 at 12:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Anna

Well, no one is going to read this, seeing as it's already Friday, but I didn't get to watch this week's episode until today. So I'll go ahead and comment anyway.

About your sidenote, Jay... Matt's latent (not so much anymore) substance abuse issues were definitely alluded to with Danny's comment about Matt needing to lay off the vodka at the end. This is a storyline that is going to keep coming up on and off, more heavily in some episodes than in others, like any Sorkin subplot.

I also thought of "Rime of the Ancient Mariner" before "Kubla Kahn" as Coleridge's most famous poem, although I was tipped off by the subtitle under the screen on NBC's online video player so I knew which it would end up being. And of course Matt had been talking about "Kubla Kahn" for about five minutes beforehand. But "Ode to a Grecian Urn" is definitely not even on the radar.

Finally, Studio 60 will almost certainly finish out the season, although it may not be until this summer. NBC has already paid for 22 episodes, so it is unlikely that they would shelve the last six. I read somewhere that the network is looking for a 3.0 rating on the episodes in order to not lose money; until the last one or two episodes S60 had achieved that every week. So I don't think that shelving the last six would really make financial sense.

February 23 2007 at 6:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
specialK

really? only molly and I get the gage-whiteny reference? either the rest of you aren't real aaron sorkin fans, or just the same peope who wanted to rip on the west wing. if these blogs were as popular when it(the west wing) first premiered, it never would have taken off.

February 21 2007 at 6:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
michael

Women wearing glasses is always hot. HOT!

I said the same thing about Rime of the Ancient Mariner to my wife while watching the show.

Other wise, the show represents another piece of damming evidence that Aaron Sorkin has nothing to say.

February 20 2007 at 5:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
AJ MacReady

Good episode - the lawsuit shows what kind of behind-the-scenes plots this show should deal with. Again, the Matt/Harriet stuff. . .look, I'll be the first to say that I do think this material is well acted and written and all that stuff. It's just that it is flat out wrong for this particular show. Sorkin seems to be working out some of his past issues with Kristin Chenoweth through his writing, which is artistically valid; much great art has been filtered through that same prism, but it is undoubtedly harming his show. A dramatic look at the inner workings of a late-night sketch show with a touch of the trademark Sorkin wit sounds great and a good counterpoint to Tina Fey's hilarious 30 Rock. I just wish they get around to commiting to doing just that.

February 20 2007 at 3:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rebecca

Too bad the punchline in the artificial baby joke was broadcast all week so we had to go through the setup with that spoiled.
I think Harriet is great, it's Jordon who is unbearably annoying. Paulson is a skilled actress unlike Peets who cannot make her character believable as being an executive at that level of authority. Peets is playing a starry eyed ingenue instead of a woman who could actually hold such a position. And she was horribly annoying in the scene on the roof with Danny, I found her headachingly shrill while up there. I kept wondering why he didn't change his mind as she babbled on and on and on. I expected him to jump off the roof just to get away from her.
The Harriet/Matt romance is tiresome but the actors playing the roles are so good that they make it watchable. The Jordon/Danny romance only has one great actor the other one is way over her pretty little head.
Even with all it's faults I haven't been able to stop watching Studio 60 and I'm going to miss it when it's gone.

February 20 2007 at 2:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
auramac

Sorry- the Harriet relationship is the heart of the show for me, and without it, I doubt I'd watch every week. It's the "must-see" part of the show, and I simply don't understand any complaints regarding her character and the story line. There are people who watch the show who love the show as it is, not because of who created it, not to see if it's going to be a train wreck (in thewir own minds)... There are many of these people, I am one of them- the rest of you can watch more conventional fare, and I hope you're happy and satisfied when this show is gone. No wonder I watch less and less TV nowadays, less and less new music... The news- well, now everyting is tabloid, and all TV will soon be 'reality." Jerry Springer has finally taken over the world without running for office!

February 20 2007 at 2:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David

"Listen, I need to say this: Harriet is still shrill and annoying. There's no way around it. I have nothing against Sarah Paulson. I think she's a fine actress who can do a really good English accent and who can also make a dolphin sound, but her character is death. If I were that kid in bed with her, I would have asked for a real gun so I could end the hell of being around her and all her silly drama."

I blame all the show's failures on her, she's a terrible charater, is completely out of place with the rest of the show. The show failed because of her and I find that amazing.

February 20 2007 at 12:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rob Stevens

This was the first episode that really distracted me. I counted three different references to The West Wing in the first five minutes ("We're nowhere." "I leave when you leave." "I'm from Gauge/Whitney.") and at least one old set piece (the Pirates of Penzance poster) later on. I'm a fan of the show, and this really soured me on the whole episode. I loved The West Wing, but that was all too blatant for me.

February 20 2007 at 12:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners