Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

Just like the winners, the Oscar ceremony was just "meh"

by Joel Keller, posted Feb 26th 2007 11:01AM
Jack Black, John C. Reilly, and Will Ferrell
ABC really needs to stage an intervention with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. It really does. Because, year in and year out, the Academy puts on an Oscars ceremony that not only runs far longer than the network intends, it just ends up boring the crap out of viewers, many of whom are asleep by the time the real categories are decided.

This year's ceremony ran from 8:30 PM ET (after a Road to the Oscars red-carpet special that was just pointless and dull) to about 12:15 AM. That's 3 hours and 45 minutes of speeches, montages, and musical numbers. My god; even the Grammys aren't that bloated, and it's nothing but musical numbers.

Yes, I know, the Oscars are long and boring every year. But this year seemed a little more boring than most. Much of it may have had to do with Ellen DeGeneres' easy-breezy hosting job. Don't get me wrong; I like Ellen a lot, and I think she was relaxed and personable in her first Oscars hosting stint. But usually a host says at least one or two things that sticks in the viewers' brains for a few weeks after the ceremony, either some good-natured slam against the industry or Jack Nicholson or some other star. But Ellen's jokes, especially in the monologue, were safe and unmemorable. The most controversial thing she said was that Penelope Cruz was Mexican instead of Spanish, which she corrected later on in the broadcast.

Ellen did have a few funny bits during the show, that played up her absurdist skills a bit; she roamed the audience and spoke to Martin Scorsese, casually handing him a screenplay for him to consider. She had Steven Spielberg take a photo of her and Clint Eastwood. And, late in the show, started vacuuming the front row, grumbling that she didn't realize she had to do so much as host. But by the time most of those funny moments happened, my eyes were already half-closed due to the top-heavy nature of this year's ceremony.

For some strange reason, the producers didn't try to hold the audience by announcing a supporting-actor award at the top of the show, which they had been doing in the recent past. By the time Alan Arkin reached the stage to get his Oscar for Little Miss Sunshine, there were enough awards for set design, sound editing, and costume design to make even the most ardent film fans want to throw a shoe at the screen.

And what's amazing to me is that the Academy tried to keep the speeches moving along, the orchestra starting to play after about 90 seconds or so. They even had the temerity to play Jennifer Hudson off the stage as she made her acceptance speech. And they kept the montages to a minimum, only showing three on top of the usual ones for the humanitarian award, the lifetime achievement award, and the "In Memoriam" popularity contest. But the ceremony was still almost four hours. This means one thing: too many categories. Yes, I know, everyone deserves their chance to shine on the big stage. But, to be honest, most fans don't care about the behind-the-scenes winners; those should be given out either before the ceremony or during the commercial breaks. Cutting the number of televised categories in half would be the biggest step the Academy can make to keep the ceremony under three hours.

Oh, and starting it at 7 might help. But that's ABC's problem... they need to pay off Barbara Walters and have her show her cloying interview special on Thursday, after Grey's Anatomy. If it's good enough for Oprah, it's good enough for Barbara.

A few good moments:

  • John C. Reilly, Jack Black, and Will Ferrell doing a song-and-dance number about how comedic actors can get Academy attention by playing dramatic roles. The best lines were directed towards sexy sexagenarian (and eventual Best Actress winner) Helen Mirren.
  • Martin Scorsese, who finally won a Best Director award for The Departed, asking presenters and pals George Lucas, Francis Ford Coppola, and Spielberg to check the envelope and make sure his name was on the card.
  • Jennifer Hudson -- who I'm starting to think is completely adorable -- showing genuine emotion when she won her Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.
  • The Dreamgirls song medley. Hudson and Beyonce both threw their hearts and lungs into the performance.
  • Al Gore being interrupted by the band when he started to "announce" his "big news."
  • Robert Downey Jr., in presenting a special effects award, described the odd visual landscapes the FX folks create, including monsters, toads, etc. He then added the line, "Which for me was just a typical weeknight in the mid-'90s."
¿Censuran beso entre Josh Brolin y Javier Bardem?

Gran revuelo ha causado esta imagen de Josh Brolin y Javier Bardem besándose en la boca durante la pasada ...

source: Celestrellas
Oscars 2011 Lead Makeup Artist Bruce Grayson on Celebrity Beauty Trends and Backstage Touch-Ups

Gwyneth Paltrow at the 2011 Oscars. Photo: J. Graylock/jpistudios.com Before Oscars presenters hit ...

source: Stylelist
12 Fun (and Depressing) Stats From The 83rd Academy Awards

The 83rd Academy Awards are over, and not a minute too soon for most viewers. No major surprises in the big ...

source: Moviefone Blog

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

31 Comments

Filter by:
Bash

Hmmkay. I don't really get this review either.

First of all I hate people who review things they know they will hate. I love Jon Stewart and even I hated parts of his performance as host last year.

That said I think you don't get award ceremonies. Remember your high school diploma? Let me ask you flat out: did you think that was boring as well? Too long? Or how about church? Do you hate going to church and sitting there thaaaat long? Or watching the state of the Union address (Iraq bla bla greenhouse effect bla bla booooring, right?).

If yes then clearly the Oscars are not for you. This is not an event where people who watch it are supposed to be entertained. Heck even the people who GET the awards have people replacing them in the audience when they leave the room during the commercial brakes. Even they can't stand the whole ceremony.

The whole thing is to give all the people you see on the credits of every friggin movie each year, that five to ten minute thing with letters that is shown when you leave the cinema, a chance to get recognized and thanked. It reminds every moviegoer that they too have a huge part in the making of movies and if they wouldn't perform at the top of their game every day, then moviegoes might not suspend their disbelief and the movie would be ruined. Special effects, score, makeup, all these things make movies great, not just the actors. Additionally, there already ARE a ton of categories that are given out at a totally different date. Every year, ARRI from germany get's an oscar for new and improved cameras which make new things possible in movies. Their progress gives directors the chance to show us things we never ever expected and all those Oscars are not shown at all, maybe a short clip, that's it. My god you ranted about a composer who, as Clint Eastwood said, composed the score for over 400 movies in 40 years. That's an INSANE amount of work and you brush that off because you are TIRED watching.

By god if you get tired watching people getting the chance to be thanked for their hard work get TIVO or a PVR, pop in a DVD and watch the ceremony afterwards and skip through the boring parts. Or go to the bathroom and pleasure yourself during the commercial breaks. Maybe add a mirror, I guess that would really spice things up, eh? :-)

I think the reason why you are so annoyed is because you have to watch every last bitof it to be able to talk about it / make a review later.

I myself had the TV turned on while playing Civilization on my computer. It wasn't boring at all.

You simply have to acknowledge that the ceremony isn't regular TV and that possible highlights are few and you don't know when they might happen. It's like finding the needles in a haystack. That CAN'T be entertaining. It ISN'T entertaining. Just deal with it.

February 28 2007 at 9:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Melissa

Do you have any idea how freakin HARD it is to make a movie? Yeah, these people are rolling in cash, but there was a time in their lives where they only ate Ramen and worked liked dogs to get where they are today. Didn't you learn anything from the Wes Anderson commercial?

February 27 2007 at 12:40 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
GhaleonQ

Wait, so you want to forgo the brilliant editors (did you see Scorsese cry?) and animated short film creators to listen to that twit Jennifer Hudson stumble blindly around the English language? Actors and actresses are not interesting on the basis of their profession, you know. It's people like you that gave Don fricking Knotts more applause than Sven Nyquist and Betty Comden.

February 26 2007 at 11:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Amber

I noticed that when when Hudson and Beyonce were singing together it sounded great even though I was half paying attention. Then when they sang separetly I could not help notice at one point Beyonce screaming at the top of her lungs. Over doing it a bit I'd say and my thought was: Beyonce just met her match and I don't think she can handle it. Too bad.

February 26 2007 at 10:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Amber

Joel, I agree with the other poster who stated that you are predetermined not to like the Oscars, so why even bother and let someone else write about it. No one once to hear your negativity, it's probably just your life.

February 26 2007 at 10:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
innamorata

Laughing my ass off at George's proposal (#19). Love it.

February 26 2007 at 7:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ryan

I always watch the Oscars with lots of friends and food. We start watching the E! Red Carpet show all the way through Best Picture. If you make it a once-a-year BIG PARTY EVENT, you actually WANT it to be longer.

As for the "lesser" awards. I usually make up Oscar ballots for my friends that ONLY consist of those awards. In this way, we actually end up caring about who wins these awards.

Anyways, we all loved Ellen. She did a great job.

February 26 2007 at 7:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rodney

The problem is not that there are too many awards; the problem is the filler between the awards. The Jack Black/Will Ferrell thing was amusing, but not worth the time it took. All of the montages are not worth the time they take. Vacuuming the front row is amusing, but not worth the time. I felt this about just about all of Ellen DeGeneres's stuff: the bits were too long.

I don't know exactly how many awards there are, but let's say 20. If you spend 2.5 minutes announcing the nominees, and 2.5 minutes for the winner to reach the stage and give a speech, that's 100 minutes (1:40) Add 2 min each for transitions. That's 2:20. Add commercials, and that's 3 hours right there. Done. Bag the songs, bag the dance numbers. The most interesting part is the speeches (or it was until people started reading lists of names).

February 26 2007 at 7:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TomB

I think pushing all the acting awards back to the last part of the show was a big mistake.

Awards like sound editing and cinematography are important to the industry, but why should they be nationally televised?

February 26 2007 at 5:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ac

I didnt actually watch it you can say, more like walked by the TV while it was on a few times. All I can say is where the hell did Jack Nicholson's hair go? That was my one thought about it.

February 26 2007 at 3:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners