Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Painkiller Jane: Pilot (series premiere)

by Richard Keller, posted Apr 13th 2007 11:09PM

Painkiller Jane(S01E01) So, you watched the premiere episode of Painkiller Jane, didn't you? Curiosity struck you even after reading my less-than-glowing review of the show, didn't it? Well, good for you! Just because I wasn't enamored with the program doesn't mean my opinion is gospel. Everyone has free will in this society and should be able to decide whether a show is good or not.

So, did you dislike Painkiller Jane as much as I did? No? Well, you must be from another planet to like something like that! How dare you not think what I think! Oh, wait, that rant voids what I said in the first paragraph. Um, never mind.

Seriously, I didn't like the show just because the acting was bad and the writing the was poor (even though the writing was poor and the acting was bad). What turned me off to this show as soon as the first scene showed up on my television screen was that this type of show has been done over, and over, and over. Let's see if this sounds familiar to you: tough-as-nails law enforcement agent obtains remarkable powers and laments over the freak that she is rather than using those powers to fight evil. Let's count on our fingers how many times that's been done. You may need your toes, too, because this has been done a lot.

I don't even know if the concept of Jane and her secret government ops team hunting Neuros would have stood the test if the show had been better. Personally, I would have rather seen a show based on the comic, which featured Jane as a vigilante. There would be many more instances of Jane receiving, and healing from, injuries as a paid mercenary-for-hire. Here, the most that she heals from is a simple gunshot wound.

There's not much I can add to my previous review, other than my complaint on the show's setting. Once again, another program where everything is dark and moody, and all of the good guys dress in blacks and other muted colors. Don't the good guys usually where white? Couldn't we have a little sunlight shine down on these people? Is their task that dire? Am I asking too many questions?

Well, there's nothing left to do other than give it a rating on a scale from 1 to 7, one being the worst. Guess what I'm giving it?

I await your comments.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

13 Comments

Filter by:
yazid

Hi from France,

I've seen the first episode of this painfull serie, and I have to agree with you about this show.
The show is for me the the perfect opposite of a great show
Dark angel. It's like the differences between mutant X and heroes

June 09 2007 at 2:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BillS

Yikes, this was bad. Kristanna Loken didn't look all that good, which I think defeats the entire point of casting her in the first place. Usually in a cast for a pilot, there's at least one actor who stands out as a decent performer, but nothing here. Maybe it's because they all got such awful dialogue, I don't know.

As for the commenter early on who took issue with the Heroes similarities, this is based off of a comic book, and Heroes has lifted virtually everything they've done straight from comics. I love the show, it's really well done, but there's nothing especially original about it, other than it being on television. Jane's healing power is like Wolverine's as much as it is like Claire's, and the Neuros are like X-Men mutants as much as they are like the powered people from Heroes.

http://popculturejunk.blogspot.com/

April 19 2007 at 8:51 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mike

What a horrible show. the openening was disturbing and sexist when a Pre pubescent girl took an uzy to all those "evil" boys and we wonder why 33+ people died in Virginia. But I quess it's o.k. now to be a fem nazi and show a girl commit a mass killing, well, as long if she is a white liberal with homosexual tendencies, and she is killing mainly white boys.

April 18 2007 at 3:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gordon Werner

I'm willing to givethis show a chance ... although the best thing that I learnt by watching Episode 1 was the announcement for the return of Eureka!

April 16 2007 at 2:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott Shively

SciFi's Saturday Night movies are usually really bad but this series made last year's Painkiller Jane look like Oscar material. I'm sorry I should have listened to you.

April 16 2007 at 1:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gordon Werner

I kinda liked Emmanuelle Vaugier in the role in the movie ... but she now has a real job on CSI:NY ...

April 16 2007 at 1:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Underseen

Honestly, im more, furious at the fact that the series seems to have little to nothing to do with the tv movie that SciFi aired a little over a year ago.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0466391/

April 15 2007 at 1:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jimmy

Painkiller Jane is, at best, underwhelming. Loken has never been an acting dynamo, and the material she's been given only accentuates that. I do agree the series has potential, but there is a lot of work to be done before that potential shows through.

April 14 2007 at 4:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tammy

I was going to watch this until all the bad reviews. I'm not a SciFi watcher normally but I did watch Eureka after all the glowing reviews and loved it. Dresden Files has a charm to it but I could live without if it conflicted with something else.... I can tape at 1 am, what conflict. But I didn't bother to waste the space on the Tivo by recording Painkiller Jane.

April 14 2007 at 11:12 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kevinc

This is their second try at Painkiller Jane. Why? Until their first movie I'd never even heard of it. There is better source material out there.

This show was soo bad. Lokan may appeal to certain age groups but please give me a lead who can act!

April 14 2007 at 10:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners