Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

The Sopranos: Remember When

by Tom Biro, posted Apr 22nd 2007 11:29PM
Sopranos Remember When
(S06E15)
Last week's promos showed Paulie in what looked like a rough situation or two, most of which featured Tony's glare right on him. That all started after Paulie made a snide remark, or more specifically was talking about himself, when the guys were toasting to Johnny Sack's life after he had passed away from cancer. As it turned out, he was absolutely in the sights of Tony when it came to life and death. And in an episode when someone is having loose lips and putting the boss in a tough situation as the body of the person that he killed to "make his bones" more than two decades earlier was apparently being dug up by the feds, the focus on Paulie being a chatterbox about his entire life story was more than appropriate.

One of the cooler things we got to see this week was Vincent Pastore's mug, as he was hanging out in the kitchen in Paulie's dream, a dream that made him want to step up to the plate, and realize that he was on his boss' bad side. Whether or not Tony just couldn't do it when it came to whacking his friend and onetime mentor or that he realized he was making a rash decision wasn't quite clear. What did happen was that we got the do-si-do from Chase & Company, who had us flat-out staring at the Jersey Crew while the New York team was about to head in another direction.

For some strange reason, I had thought that Tony and Carm's relationship had improved significantly since last season, but his relations with the woman in Florida told us otherwise. Then again, I guess I should know by now to separate sex and marriage when it comes to The Sopranos, shouldn't I? When Paulie and Tony headed off to Florida for a few days on a road trip, it seemed like the perfect setup to take out one of the main characters of the series, and one that would have surely caused a stir among hardcore fans, irrelevant of how many episodes are left over. But, as they traveled down the East Coast in I-95, it was apparent that one of the things that we were supposed to get out of it all was that they were getting older. Sure, we've seen that for the last few weeks with Phil making lots of comments about health and aging, and Tony has let on about how things are different now, but the motel turning into a full-fledged hotel, valet parking and all, and Paulie's remarks about Pete using a bag to go to the bathroom in, it's almost like a soft, slow way to "say goodbye" to these characters as the show gets closer to finishing up.

All those allusions makes me wonder if we're going to have a much more "open-ended" closing than a violent one. Then again, with Phil seemingly taking control by force in a blatantly ugly way - a gunshot to the eye and everything - on Doc on the city streets, you never know what kind of clashes could cross the Hudson River.

One small item that came up this week that looks like it's going to be a major part at least next week was cash flow for Mr. Soprano. Sure, he said to Carm that she could get whatever she needed, but taking out a bridge loan for the gambling tab, combined with something happening to the spec house next week doesn't look so good, now does it? And on top of that, Junior isn't going to have his life end in such a sorrowful way, is he? I mean, surely Tony's not happy with him for shooting him and all, and it's uncomfortable after AJ's attempt to kill him in the home, but what's going to happen when the boss hears about the fellow home-member attempting to kill this man that was part of his growing up in the family? Maybe nothing, the way Tony looked at the photo of his father and Junior.

In a show like this, everything always "means" something, doesn't it? Maybe Junior's downfall, forgetfulness, and problems with controlling his need to urinate are all just flat out symbolic, as in the end of an era. If that's the case, might Tony's fighting for himself and his family (the statement to Carmella about Paulie buying them the espresso maker are big here) along with his take-no-prisoners attitude, at least verbally, of late be the start of what could be a fight to the bitter end, or will we go down nice and easily, with the last episode being no different than any other, but without a followup at the end? I think it's still too early to say, either way, what will happen for the rest of this season, and the show is put together brilliantly, and will hopefully end just as solidly as it has run up to this point, even if we do have to forgive a dream sequence.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

29 Comments

Filter by:
bloomdog

Finn never loved Meadow. He proposed to either shut her up or to ensure protection from Vito. I bet he got sick of her and threw her out.

April 29 2007 at 9:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bloomdog

My predictions for series ending:
1. Tony gets arrested by the FBI (who knows what Eugene gave them!!!!!!???); helps FBI in terrorist matter; goes into witness protection and loses everything.
2. Tony goes to war with NY, or, better yet, NY goes to war with Tony to avenge Frank's brother's death; no matter who wins, it'll be spectacular.

April 29 2007 at 9:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Julie S.

I am with you, Marcia, #25, on the Meadow issues. She went to California to live with Finn and now she's back and they're not together anymore? Huh?? I have wondered for a while whether Vito knew something about Finn that we didn't know. Does anyone know what happened between Meadow and Finn??

April 26 2007 at 5:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jonathan Harford

"In a show like this, everything always "means" something, doesn't it?"

Funny you should say that. I find the Sopranos quite unique in that things happen that make the audience say "oh, we haven't seen the last of that" and then never reappear.

April 26 2007 at 2:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
marcia

Can anyone tell me when Meadow came back from California? End of last season she was in CA with Finn, now she's back and in pre-med and Finn is not "normal". Think Vito pegged him right as gay?

April 24 2007 at 7:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Kione

If Tony is done in by a gambling problem it absolutely would be out of the blue! Remember David Scatino in Season 2?!?! He basically destroys the guy's life and justifies it because the guy couldn't control his gambling impulses.

Another problem I have with the storyline is it seems to totally contradict everything we know about Tony's finances. It has never seemed to me like 200K would be that big of a deal for him.

Then again, the scene with Hesh and the preview ... it definitely looks like they're going to go there. It just seems lame to me. Why can't they take advantage of one of Tony's other well-established weaknesses? They've got the depression, the parent issues, the womanizing ... even overeating would be better!!!

April 23 2007 at 4:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Debby

About the VT shooter issue - my husband also made the connection. Fox was trying to be sensitive by not showing a new epi set on a campus regardless of how tenuous the connection to VT was. Now HBO had a new epi (probably filmed last year) with a disturbed Asian character. PC is fine but neither of these shows reflected directly on the VT situation and should have been shown as scheduled. (It's not F-O-X, it's H-B-O!) Okay - moving on.

The best part of the epi was Junior's letter to VP Cheney regarding the "accidental shooting" of a close friend. I was rolling. That was classic Daily Show material. And then of course the VP's response.

April 23 2007 at 4:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
heinlein

First I don't think that the Sopranos need more violence, infact I tend to close my eyes when things get too bloody.

I think that the Sopranos has became a less interesting show the last years. In part because he doesn't have to deal so much with his other life and his kids in a really normal way anymore, now that they has moved out, and that he generally deals less with the ordinary people or we see less of his "average joe" part of life nowadays. Another thing is that they tend to drag out all scenes a lot more nowadays (sure they did so sometimes in the beginning too, but not nearly as much). Five, maybe ten, minutes with Jun would have been enough to get the main point, he's old and in a way getting his punishment. I can understand that they drag out Tony's indecisiveness about Paulie, but it still felt a bit long. It just felt like they could have had a real third story in this episode without we would have missed something essential, maybe about AJ, or Meadow or the crew back home.

I agree with agentmichaelscarn that they should have more interesting stories to tell, since we are so close to the end.

April 23 2007 at 4:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bmellin

Marlon--I also think that the Tony's alleged gambling debt comes into the story from out-of-the-blue, but I don't think it's bad writing. True, there has never been much evidence of Tony's gambling during the series, but since the writers have generally been very good at creating character motivation, my guess is that Tony is using "gambling debt" as an excuse to gather together some additional money to fund some sort of move that'll play out before the end of the series. Perhaps Tony thinks that by saying he needs $200K for a gambling debt, no questions will be asked, but if he were simply to ask for the money with no explanation as to why, red flags would be raised. I need to watch the show again tonight, but didn't he also kid Carmella, at one point, that he and Paulie were going to Florida for a little R & R, with some gambling? A convenient untruth, I think. My guess for the conclusion? Tony's got a boat, a boatload of cash, and he takes off for parts unknown, alone. A mobbed-up version of the main character in Robert Stone's _Outerbridge Reach_.

April 23 2007 at 3:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dorv

Wow. First off, I have to say, I'm not a racist. Not that I should have to defend myself, or explain myself, but I'm not. Mine was more a reaction to a young man with mental health and rage problems, not necessarily an Asian man. In fact, my first reaction was similar to others... "Hey, that's the kid with the spiky face from X-Men." I even went back and reread my post, and consulted dictionary.com's definition of racism, just to be sure.

To the person who person who said I am a bit oversensitive about the whole thing, I would agree with you 100%. I grew up in Virginia, (basically) just got out of college (in Virginia), and I spent most of Monday calling friends to make sure that they were ok and waiting for the media to release a list of names. So yeah, guilty as charged there.

For the rest of you, instead of just railing on what I said because you expected some PC Jerk to complain, why don't you go and actually READ what I said. I've been reading/posting on this website for a long time, and I've never seen someone flamed so quickly than this post.

April 23 2007 at 2:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners