Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

Brothers and Sisters: Matriarchy (season finale)

by Jen Creer, posted May 21st 2007 12:50AM
dave annable(S01E23) At the beginning of the episode, Justin says, "Life is what happens in between big sets." He is talking about surfing, and also the past year and everything that has happened. I'm still trying to figure out whether or not that is true, profound, or whether, as Justin said, it just sounded poetic in his head. And I think I'm going to have to go with poetic in Justin's head. Just like I think this episode was probably so much better in the writers' heads. I have to admit, I am a little disappointed. I am struggling with a huge bias here though: I HATE slapstick. Hate it. And so whenever this show employs it, I just kind of shut down and zone out. Last week was a brilliant, beautiful episode, and I wish they had just stopped with that. In fact, in my mind, last week's episode is just going to be the season finale, and we'll just pretend this one didn't happen, shall we?

It was bad enough that the tent collapsed, but Robert McCallister's family was too much. It was such a caricature that there wasn't anything real or grounded about it to remain in the episode for during those scenes. And they were intermingling this with Justin sneaking off to war? It was just too much, too disparate. And perhaps it was leading up to the moment in which they all, in their fancy clothes, hurled themselves into the swimming pool, but what could have been an elegant release, a cleansing, a baptism, a washing away of the past year, past sins, the sorrows and anguish, just... wasn't. I can appreciate what they were going for, but it lacked a lot in translation and execution.

I always like Garry Marshall, but it was just too much, you know? The jokes about his name Major Weiner, which was pronounced alternatively Whiner and Weener (his name is Jack, Robert's is Bobby - what are these? The anti-Kennedys? And Jack and Bobby BOTH died, so look out, Brothers and Sisters writers. Are these the comparisons you are really establishing for us?), were bad enough. But then his lewdness, reaching into his pocket, grabbing Nora's "caboose," and the entire family? The entire Beverly Hillbillies clan? I just cannot believe that Robert and Jason (too close to Justin, I get the names confused) came from that family. Robert jokingly asks Kitty whether he is still electable after she meets his family (didn't she go to his hometown to find dirt about him? How did none of this ever surface? Unbelievable, and poorly anticipated), and she says, "Probably not," and I think it was supposed to be a joke, but let me tell you: It wasn't. With that family, he is completely unelectable.

They are the kind of people who vomit in public and pee in the pansies. You cannot take them anywhere. And who exactly were they trying to make fun of? Who are these people supposed to be? Jason tells Robert that they were raised Catholic (another Kennedy reference) but he became a Methodist minister. So, are we making fun of Catholics? California hicks? People who bring artichoke ambrosia to catered parties? I don't get the joke. Surely, at some point in his career (or say, his engagement to his first wife), Robert had to bring his family to public gatherings. He should either give them a list of rules or stop inviting them. He should know better. Nora tells him that you never have to apologize for family, but yes, Brothers and Sisters writers, yes you do.

We had some nice, quiet revelations: Holly and Sarah had a nice moment of making peace. Saul's friend admitting that he is gay, and the sudden aha! about Saul, and Saul's painful, silent, denial. Julia's depression is growing and Tommy's trying to hide it, not really facing it yet. Rebecca finally came clean about her torrid past (oh, and it is torrid, but I think her past actually makes her a more sympathetic character, just because she is damaged, and she was so young). Do you think she will come clean to Sarah? Kitty and Nora rushing to the airport - I have to admit, I had tears in my eyes when I started writing the review, just because of Justin leaving. I have three sons, who are very young, but that was still hard. But these moments didn't really add up to anything. And other moments were going for some kind of closure, poignancy, like Kitty and Nora squabbling about Kitty moving out, and they just ended up falling flat.

I know that I am being really harsh, and it's because I'm irritated. This show can be so damn good when it's really good, but uneven crap like this is going to have a negative effect on the show. Take a look at all of the episodes that have hit notes like this, look at the bylines of those writers, and get rid of them. Keep the good ones, and if you have to, hire some new ones. Talent abounds. It shouldn't be that hard.

rating 3I'm giving this episode a 3 out of 7, but I realize that I am probably biased about the slapstick and perhaps I am being overly prickly about it. I just can't give it a 4 though: that negates every other episode that really merits a 4. But oh, Lordy, I can't wait to see what you guys thought of it.

(Brothers and Sisters - S01E23) - How do you rate this episode?
1 - Worst12 (2.8%)
214 (3.2%)
321 (4.8%)
462 (14.3%)
5100 (23.1%)
693 (21.5%)
7 - Best131 (30.3%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

30 Comments

Filter by:
derrick

i was wondering if any one knew when season 2 of brothers and sisters was gonna be on if sum could please let me know i would appreciate it my email is lajeunesse@comcast.net

July 29 2007 at 10:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
derrick

i was wondering if any one knew when season 2 of brothers and sisters was gonna be on if sum could please let me know i would appreciate it my email is lajeunesse@comcast.net

July 29 2007 at 10:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rachel

Dude. Why did it post my old comment again?

July 07 2007 at 5:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jeyl38

I read your comments and I just want to give you a European point of view (sorry if my grammar is not correct but I'm French ...).
The thing is, when we talk about American people in France most French people see Americans as self centered people with a very strong sense of morality (no offence, I'm sure you'd have plenty of stereotypes on French people too).
But, for about 5 years or more, American television introduced new shows that are so whoooa, shows that make you forget all possible stereotypes. It is fiction still but written by real people ..., the characters are INTERESTING, so unshallow (I don't know if I can say that ?), including those in Brothers and Sisters.
So, if you are shocked because of 2 men making out and find it immoral then don't watch ... still, you are very lucky to have such great shows !

June 18 2007 at 9:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Scott

I just got to the SF of B&S on my TiVo tonight, and came right to TV Squad to read the review and the usually interesting comments. On the episode as a whole, I agree with the original review--too slapsticky, too many stupid moments. And Justin's plot was moving.

But I was really upset to see all the narrow-minded people who watch the show and found it necessary to comment on how awful the 3.2 seconds of gay kissing was, and how it offended them. What show were you watching all season? A number of commenters have already responded eloquently to all of you hateful people. I can't understand how you could've watched the show all season. I'd rather have the ratings drop and have it get cancelled than have the show's creator and showrunner (both gay--surprise! the creative people are gay!) "tone it down" for those of you still living in the 1950s. I guess all the grisly murders and autopsies on CSI and Law & Order don't offend your sensibilities? They sure offend mine. And gay kissing doesn't.

June 03 2007 at 10:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rachel

Just read the second page. I'm new to this site and I want to reply to shish but can't seem to find a way to directly reply, so I'll just comment again.

shish, your comment smacks of ignorance and intolerance. For one thing, I'm straight and yes, watching gay people kiss does entertain me. Not only does it entertain me because I like to see gay relationships given equal screentime as straight relationships but also on a aesthetic level. I like to see hot guys (and girls!) make out. I don't think it's wrong and it doesn't make me uncomfortable in the least. And I personally know many people that agree with me. Yes, they're straight too.

And secondly, just because heterosexual people outnumber homosexual people does NOT give us the right to censor what kinds of relationships and characters are shown on a TV show or any other types of media, not to mention the real world.

I do agree with you on one point. People such as yourselves don't have to watch this show and others like it. Frankly, I'd rather you didn't. But like others have said, I would rather Brothers and Sisters was cancelled than have them "tone down" already tame gay content.

Shish (and others), I feel sorry for you-- because the rest of the world is going to pass you by while you stick your head in the sand and refuse to accept that there are people different from you and those people are not freaks and they are not monsters and they are not something to be afraid of or repulsed by. They are normal people who have normal relationships and deserve to be given a fair portrayal in the media and fair treatment in real life.

As a member of a majority, it is not your right to oppress a minority. It should be your DUTY to help make this world a better and more equal place for everyone to live in.

Injustice should not be tolerated. Period. It shouldn't matter how a particular group makes you feel.

June 01 2007 at 12:06 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rachel

I don't know if anyone is still reading this, but I have to disagree on a couple of things, both from the original review and the comments. I don't hink Jack and Bobby(Robert) was a reference to the Kennedys. If anything it was a reference to Greg Berlanti (Exec. Producer)'s old show Jack and Bobby. Why do I think that? The boys in that show had the last name of McCallister as well. Also I don't think that Jason's comment was a slam on the Catholic church, at least not an undeserved one. I don't know much about Methodism but I do know Catholicism is extremely unaccepting towards homosexuality. Jason McCallister had a legitimate issue with the Catholic church. It is not unheard of for people to switch churches. Believe me, I know. My own mother used to be Catholic.

Also, why are people complaining about the "unreality" of the plotlines? How long have you been watching the show? This show has been very soapish from the beginning. That's part of the reason I enjoy it. I mean, aside from the on phenomenal acting.

And just to weigh in on the "Omigosh Kevin is gay and kisses boys and this is new to me" comments-- maybe you should stop watching. Those of us who are more openminded don't want you. First of all, I am glad to see Kevin have relationships and not be a miserable sexless man like Will from Will and Grace. And I am proud of ABC and Matthew Rhys, and the writers and producers of Brothers and Sisters for not being afraid to show a normal gay man.

Secondly, so what if Saul is possibly gay? It's
not exactly out of the realm of possibility for there to be more than one gay person in a family. Honestly! Some people are acting like it will physically harm them to watch another gay character. Get a grip! There are gay men and women watching this show and I don't see them complaining about how it's unfair that Brothers and Sisters is forcing straight characters down our throat.

Thirdly, Kevin is by no means a slut. He has had 2 relationships in a years time and is probably about to start another one. How is this unusual? I get that it might seem like he jumps from Scotty to Chad to Jason in a very short amount of time because of how the episodes are presented but it's unfair to call him a slut just because of that. And again this brings up the double standards of some of the viewers. Kitty has had the same amount of relationships as Kevin in the duration of the show but no one is calling her a slut. Not only did she cheat on her fiancee with Warren and end up breaking the engagement, but she also ( in the course of a year) became engaged to another man who just recently divorced his wife. I'm not saying she doesn't love McCallister or anything, but it just seems a little hasty to me.

And again with the double standards about intimacy on television! Others have pointed it out, but I feel it bears repeating. The heterosexual intimacy on this show has been far more graphic than the homosexual intimacy. As far as I can remember, the most graphic (if you can even consider it graphic) the homosexual content has been has either been Kevin in bed in the Valentine's episode with the implication he and Scotty had sex the night before or the scene with Chad and Kevin taking off their shirts and kissing, with the implication they were about to have sex. Correct me if I'm wrong but neither of these scenes would be as controversial if they took place with a heterosexual couple instead of a homosexual one. But we've also seen Tommy and Julia on the floor in a (?) coatroom, Sarah and Joe start to have sex in front of a camera, and seen Justin and Tyler obviously post-coital, with Justin squeezing fruit onto her naked back and licking letters in the juice. Seems a little more explicit than partial nudity and kissing to me.

Finally, does anyone really expect either Berlanti (openly gay Exec. Producer) or Robbie Baitz (openly gay creator, Exec. Producer, and head writer) to stop allowing homosexual characters and relationships in the show just because some closeminded and outdated people whine about the gay content and threaten to leave the show? Please. Well, I think I have said all I needed to say. I hope someone comes across this comment and it changes their mind about some things.

May 31 2007 at 11:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David Lauri

Ugh, you know, I'm going to have to stop reading sites about shows I like and just watch the shows. I like Brothers and Sisters for a lot of reasons, not least because it features a gay character who is real, who makes mistakes, and yes, who gets to kiss cute guys from time to time. But the show's about more than that, and believe me, heterosexuals get way more chances on this show to flaunt their sexuality than the queers do. Watching the show I get to think, hey, America's growing up and learning to accept gay people. Reading the comments, I realize how long we still have to go.

And if it comes down to a choice of toning down the few scenes where Kevin does get to be a fully functioning gay man or having Brothers and Sisters canceled, I say, cancel the damned series if that's the only choice. We don't need more Will and Graces featuring charming celibate gays who know their place and don't want to offend squeamish straight people.

May 26 2007 at 2:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
nate

There is NOTHING to tone down. By all means if you think men kissing is a good enough reason to stop watching, please go right ahead.

And B&S ratings isn't going down, it just made #19 on Nielsen's last week and being renewed by ABC for season 2.

May 22 2007 at 7:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
shish

It's not normal for heterosexuals to be entertained by watching gays kiss. It's uncomfortable. Because they are the majority, they don't have to get used to it and they don't have to watch it. Which gets back to my point if ABC doesn't tone it down, the show will end up canceled.

May 22 2007 at 4:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners