Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Is Heroes doing too much, too soon?

by Bob Sassone, posted Aug 23rd 2007 10:39AM
Heroes banner

I was thinking about this the other day. Even though I named Heroes as the best show of the year, I've been worried lately that season two might turn out to be an over-hyped, overdone disaster that will make me tire of it really quickly. I mean, they're adding cast members at an astonishing rate (Kristin Bell, Nichelle Nichols, David Anders, Stephen Tobolowsky, Janel Parrish, Jessica Collins). They're going to have a storyline in another time (Hiro), produced a spinoff mini-series to be directed by Kevin Smith, produced online stories and comics to keep fans entertained and well-fed and gone on a world tour to promote the show. It's really overwhelming, and I hope they're not doing too much, too soon.

The Boston Globe's Matthew Gilbert is worried too.

Gilbert's main point is that it seems like Tim Kring and NBC are throwing so much at us that it's turning the little show that could into an overyhyped money machine that dwarfs even other overyhyped shows:

As the fall TV season approaches, and we wonder which series will shame themselves, "Heroes" is looking increasingly like a prime suspect. Since the Monday night show is NBC's only newish non-reality hit, the network and Kring have spent the summer heaping tacky expansion gimmicks onto it with abandon. "Heroes" has been turned into a relentless and tiresome source of merchandising, casting, and spinoff hype -- hype about how the show will grow as a product, not media-generated hype about how good it is.

To me, it's as if NBC is pressing "Heroes" into child labor. The network is working the show like a mature blockbuster -- on the order of "CSI" or "Lost" -- too soon. Underneath all the great expectations, there is just a wee sci-fi TV series whose unformed back is carrying too much weight.

"Heroes" has great potential, based on much of its first season, to be special and enduring. But, like many new series, it still needs refining and tender loving care before it deserves to be turned into a synergistic linchpin. Its Emmy nomination this summer for outstanding drama series came too soon.

He makes some good points, though there's no way I'm not going to watch, of course. The first season was way too good to simply say this show has "jumped the shark" (I really hate that term now) already. I just hope they really weave the new cast members into the show really well. There was already a giant cast, and now they're adding a ton more, and those storylines could really get out of control really fast. Unless they plan on killing most of the original cast (which of course they aren't).

So what do you think? Is Heroes going overboard?

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

24 Comments

Filter by:
Makraam

I think it was important to add some characters but not too many as people like DL died and some were necessary cause thing like claire moving. I think the Hiro thing is a bit much I'd rather he was in the main story as for peter being in ireland and looking like staying there a while well thats rubbish. Mind it will mean that the lesser powered characters will have to do more which isnt that bad is it? As long as the dont add more characters and some die... perhaps nathan will die since claires boyfriend flies...I hope nathan dies never ever liked him. And I think Nikki has the plague so she might die... we need to see u don't know whos going to die yet do u? As for "too many characters" u included the lead girl of the cheerleading team... thats just to remind claire what she cant have and ur adding quite clearly the supporting non important characters (well they are for the moment).

October 13 2007 at 8:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
lovelain

well, i for one disagree. i think a lot of these new cast members are not gonna have HUGE roles that take away from the existing characters...some of them might sure, but certainly not all of them. like someone said earlier, there were a ton of people who had small roles in season 1 as well. a quick trip to imdb and i just noted that there were 30+ roles in season 1 that were not the "main" characters. did the following characters make the story "out of control"? audrey hansen, janice parkman, claude, molly walker, heidi petrelli, wireless, eden mccain, candice...sooo, yeah s.1 had a bunch of small(er) parts that didn't, imo, detract from the show @ all.

the comic book stuff, meh...i don't really consider that to be a big part of any hype..no one but hardcore fans are gonna get into that.

heroes: origins is a great idea, imo, since the hiatus' are so infuriating to me. @ least that'll help make it up. to me, it's enough that there's always a huge break around christmas...there really doesn't need to be another one in the spring.

i have faith in those behind the show. can't wait for sept. 24th!

August 28 2007 at 5:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nibehlung

I'll be really unhappy if they start killing the original characters to make space for these newcomers. The show has gone out of its way to promote season 2 using the original regulars to attract viewers back into the show. It'll be a full deception if they just do that but then they ignore the original regulars or worse, kill them halfway through.

August 24 2007 at 7:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fred

Not only are they overselling it, which might for sure have a negative impact on the way people feel towards the show, and yeah I watch that latest promo... OMG. Are they full of themselves or what!??

But the worst part is, they seem to have lost any interest in writing a good show anymore. Kring wanted a new set of charcaters each season, then agreed to change his mind because network said it would be best, that fans liked those characters.
Then he changed his mind again, and they're having a brand new set of Heroes, only they didn't take any risks and (pretty much) won't kill anyone from the first season either, and now the decisions are made from a marketing point of view, not a creative one.
Look at the S1 finale, piece of crap, and the more it goes the more I feel seaosn 2 will follow those footsteps...

http://88.191.26.34/i_watch_tv/2007/08/23/will-too-much-heroes-kill-heroes/

August 24 2007 at 5:42 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mel

*rocks back and forth*

"I have complete and total faith in Heroes and it deserves the attention it gets... I have complete and total faith in Heroes and it deserves all the attention it gets..."

August 23 2007 at 5:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
radwimp

I was pretty tired of it after the quality of the last few episodes tanked. 'Company Man' was the last 'wow!' episode for me, and also the best of the series. Oh well, hope I'll get back into it when the new season starts.

August 23 2007 at 5:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dave

It seems that everyone has forgotten how terribly the season ended. Did we ever get an explanation of why he couldnt just fly himself away from everyone else??

August 23 2007 at 4:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joey Geraci

Heroes really and truly never deserved the hype it received, and I really can't understand how anybody could possibly say it is the best show on the air now. After a great start, it devolved into a merely OK show.

August 23 2007 at 2:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jennifer

Well, is it possible? Yes. But I am going to wait and see how they handle things before I make a judgment.

At any rate, Heroes is my favorite show currently on the air, so...

August 23 2007 at 2:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Oreo

It will not be number one anythnig except the number one show on NBC... MAYBE.

They are adding way too many charaters, that will most likely confuse new viewers and some of the old viewers still hate the way the first season ended.

I think this show will fall from grace as quickly as it rose.

August 23 2007 at 1:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners