Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

No! More! Round! Stages!

by Richard Keller, posted Sep 17th 2007 12:21PM

Ryan Seacrest acosts cast members of Desparate Housewives from the round stage. Too bad the other side of the theater just saw his backside.For the first time in a long time I watched the entire Emmy broadcast on Sunday. I'm usually not into these types of awards show, but I thought I'd tune in since I do write about television from time to time. For the most part I didn't think it was that bad. Ryan Seacrest didn't embarrass himself as much as I thought he would, the presenters weren't that corny when it came time to read the cue cards, and the musical numbers were good (I liked the set by the Jersey Boys the most). I only had one real problem with the show. A problem that I'm guessing most of the presenters, award winners, audience members, and viewers had as well . . .

The theater-in-the-round stage.

I don't know who thought of this idea, but it was a very bad one. A round stage is good for plays like Hamlet, where the actors roam about the area. It's not good for awards shows where one part of the audience always sees your front and the other one has a wonderful view of your ass (although I'm sure there were members of the audience who were very happy with their ass-viewing seats). Award shows are static, not fluid like a performance of Stomp!.

Perhaps, if they had rotated the position where the presenters and winners came up to speak, so people on stage would face one side of the audience for a bit and then the other side, this complaint would not have happened. But, the microphone stayed in one place throughout the entire show. Would it have been that difficult to place a microphone at each side? Or, maybe four mike stands, since the audience members along the side would have like to seen a full profile of the people up on stage.

Maybe the producers thought it brought about a more personal feeling to the Emmys. Something akin to the casual feeling you get at the Golden Globes, perhaps. If anything, the result was just the opposite: it made the ass-viewing audience members envy what the front-facing audience members were seeing. It reminded me of that Dr. Seuss story The Sneetches. The front-facing audience members were the Sneetches with stars on their bellies, and the ass-viewing audience members were the Sneetches without stars.

You want to make the Emmy awards more intimate? Fine, then make it a square stage, have all of the audience facing front, and cut the amount of people invited down from six thousand to about 100. Or, you can have it at a Las Vegas hotel and present individual awards in different suites across the resort. Heck, that worked so well for MTV's Video Music Awards.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

14 Comments

Filter by:
Jan Lyon

Many of these glamorous stars are so appealing when acting, but when it's time to accept their awards, they show their butts!! They should try to ACT like educated women, instead of the ditzy movie stars that they really are!!!

September 18 2007 at 9:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
stewartwallace

I thought that it was fun for a change, although it would have been more useful it there had been a host (Ellen comes to mind) more capable of 'working the audience'. The in-the-round staging gave me flashbacks to The Flip Wilson Show. Good times!

September 17 2007 at 5:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bob Mc

I thought the same thing while watching the show. The winners kept looking over their shoulders to talk to audience. They never looked towards the camera.

September 17 2007 at 5:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
C C

Round stages are fine for musical events-not for award ceremonies. I must admit though, I did love it when Helen Mirren, presenting the award for best drama series, opened the envelope, held it up, and turned around in a circle so everyone could see that "THE SOPRANOS" was the winner.

September 17 2007 at 5:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bash

I don't know why you think the stage was that bad.

The people in the back should have seen more ass in there lifetime than I ever will so THEY should be used to it.

:-)

September 17 2007 at 4:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TVGenius

It looked better than most of the sets used for award shows, and they did do some of the show facing back, or at an off-angle. I think they just had to keep most of it aimed forward, since they didn't want these award-winning actors to have to try to think on their feet and find the prompter.

September 17 2007 at 3:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Oreo

I didn't watch, and only watched the Family Guy clip, and the round thing drove me crazy.

September 17 2007 at 3:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tv junkie

I found it funny that many of the ABC stars, cast from Boston Legal and Ugly Betty among others, had to watch people's behind for the entire night....even during those unnecessary performances. I'm sure there's not gonna be any round stages in the future.

September 17 2007 at 2:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jeremy Tucker

I absolutely agree that they could've set up more mike stands at different places of the stage and focus all around the theather, but I loved the round stage. It looked gorgeous, plus I had a better view of the ceremony than a bunch of the stars there, so I'm not complaining.

James Spader complained somewhere that his bosses had to stare at his back during his acceptance speech. Yeah, that's really awful, considering they could properly see him accepting the award only fifty billion other times.

September 17 2007 at 2:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RadioScott

I gotta say, I liked the stage. Who cares what the audience was seeing?! I was more interested in what I was seeing at home. And to me it looked good. I enjoyed watching the reaction of the audience in the background to what was happening on stage.

I was surprised that so many supposedly television savvy people were making fun of the stage. Hey folks! The stage was meant to appeal to the TV viewer. Not you!

Scott
blog plug: http://www.sacksofwetcement.com

September 17 2007 at 1:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners