Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

WWE Raw celebrates 15 years with renewal

by Jason Hughes, posted Dec 7th 2007 3:39PM

WWE RawMonday, WWE Raw will be celebrating 15 years with a special three-hour episode. On the eve of this celebration, Reuters tells us that the wrestling program's contract has been extended another two years, guaranteeing more chair smashing, smack talking through 2010. The overall deal includes a continuation of the twice yearly NBC Saturday night specials, the A.M. Raw weekend USA show, as well as a Spanish-language edition for the growing Telemundo networks.

After fifteen years, Raw remains one of cable's strongest programs, currently averaging 5.1 million viewers weekly. And since it doesn't go into reruns, that's strong programming year-round, which at this time has to look pretty enticing to the network. If things continue with the strike, we might even see more WWE programming come to NBC proper.

Now, I'm not trying to ruin anyone's Christmas by blowing the big secret here, but ... isn't wrestling scripted and fake? And doesn't that mean there are writers? Are they on strike? Is wrestling going to go into reruns? Am I going to get to see George "The Animal" Steel and Andre "The Giant" in the squared circle again? Those early Wrestlemania's were a lot of fun.

Or maybe, if their writers are on strike, we can get rid of all the posturing and speechifying and maybe go back to wrestling. When I was young, a three-hour wrestling show would have 10-15 matches. Now it takes 30 minutes to even start a match. That's not to say there wasn't posturing and speeches and the soap operatics that made wrestling "entertainment" famous, there just was less of it and more of the wrestling side. My main reason for watching was the impressive feats of skill and cunning that the British Bulldogs displayed, along with the fun of "The Million Dollar Man" and the Ultimate Warrior, and the earliest appearances of then tattoo-less The Undertaker, complete with manager Paul Bearer who did all his talking for him.

Of course, ratings are higher now than they were then, so this is what the public wants. All I'm gonna say is I remember when "Stone Cold" was "Stunning" Steve Austin with his pretty boy haircut and primping and preening ... damn, wrestling was retarded then, too. I guess we like it that way.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

13 Comments

Filter by:
Riley Freeman

that i didnt know and thanks for letting me know. i searched and could never find anything but i never use amazon so maybe thats why. i didnt want the nwo back. nobodoy knows how to bring them back. if u want to bring them back u have to bringthem back EXACTLY how they came. but all the interest characters are gone. shawn michaels is so high up on his god horse that he wont even do the dx sign properly. it would be kind of funny if stone cold did the turn a la hulk hogan and became stunning steve austin again lol

December 10 2007 at 9:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Riley Freeman

wrestling lost its juice once the rock and stone cold left. the monday night wars was the best. dx stone cold the hart foundation, nwo. vince mcmahon will be the downfall of wrestling. stone cold is my fav wrestler and he was a MAJOR part of wwe winning and wrestling being as popular as it was. but NWO we all know was the most popular thing is wrestling history. why has VINCE not released a dvd? CAN YOU SAY EGO? NWO is what kicked his ass and he refuses to put together a dvd. the hulk hogan turn had to be the greatest thing in wrestling history nothing more shocking.

and chris jericho (who i was a fan of just before he initially went to wwe and while he was there and the FIRST undisputed champion) return is lackluster and boring. he keeps saying stupidness on the mic. he needs to return to being how he used to be hes just saying a whole bunch of stuff and hes puttign me to sleep kind of like watching an ultimate warrior interview

December 10 2007 at 2:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Riley Freeman's comment
Mark R

Actually Riley, WWE did release an nWo DVD in 2002:

http://www.amazon.com/WWE-World-Order-Back-Black/dp/B000067J4M/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1197315971&sr=8-1

You have to remember WWF bought WCW before renaming itself as WWE, so it had full rights to nWo. The whole nWo return kind of fizzled anyway because Hogan, Hall, and Nash, were all too old and battered.

Yeah, agreed on Jericho. He needs to dig back to his hilarious WCW days. In general, WWE needs to go back to what made it great, good characters like Bret Hart, Million Dollar Man, and Hulk Hogan. Instead, today we get Triple H teaming up with Jeff Hardy. I give up...

December 10 2007 at 2:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Paul

I stopped watching wrestling a couple years back, right around the time Chris Jericho left. Though him returning recently hasn't caused me to start watching again -- besides the fact that it's much more "stupid" entertainment than it used to be (I'd classify the more classic stuff as "silly", in a cartoon-y kind of way), I'd just much rather be watching "Heroes" or "Life" or "Chuck" or "How I Met Your Mother" or "Samantha Who" or just about anything else on Monday nights. :P

Good luck to you, WWE and the 15-year-old RAW, but I don't miss you! Heh.

December 07 2007 at 11:08 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bd

Did a different person write the second and third paragraph?

December 07 2007 at 10:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Vito

Vince McMahon has toiled for a very long time to prevent wrestlers from unionizing, so I have no doubt he would find any way possible to avoid going anywhere NEAR union guys. If there were ever a modern poster industry for the usefulness of unions, pro wrestling might be it.

December 07 2007 at 9:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Matthew

I remember a Bret Hart interview from a few months ago where he said that the janitors at the venues get better venues than the wrestlers. So yeah, probably no Guild members working for them.

December 07 2007 at 6:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Matthew's comment
Matthew

*benefits, not venues, as paying wrestlers in venues would be silly. >_>

December 07 2007 at 6:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Alex

No unions in wrestling!

December 07 2007 at 5:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
h8rain

I have not watched wrasslin' ("professional" wrestling) in years, but I remember when RAW first started. I was either 9 or 10. Ahh fond childhood memories :).

The funniest thing about wrasslin' is it is basically a soap opera for men. Replacing Person X's husband sleeping with the neighbor lady, with Wrestler X wanted to beat the crap out of Wrestler Y because he called him dumb.

December 07 2007 at 4:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Justin Williams

Raw is a goofy show, but it can be entertaining. Angry Vince McMahon rules.

December 07 2007 at 4:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Justin Williams's comment
Dan Buckley

Yes, more angry Vince = more gooder

December 08 2007 at 12:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brent McKee

Fake? Of course. Scripted? Define scripted.

Undoubtedly Wrestling has scenarios laid out as to how things are supposed to go, although sometimes the details aren't even told to all of the participants (see Bret "The Hitman" Hart and the Montreal Screwjob) but there's a difference between that and the sort of script that TV shows have. Even if there are detailed scripts prepared for wrestling shows, I am willing to bet that the writers aren't covered by the WGA, in much the same way that the guys who write Drew Carey's material on "The Price is Right" or "The Power of Ten" aren't covered by the Guild.

December 07 2007 at 4:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners