Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

Boston Legal: No Brains Left Behind

by Paul Goebel, posted Dec 12th 2007 9:39AM

Boston Legal

(S04E09) "I wouldn't sue God, he's a flight risk." - Alan Shore

I guess I'm just naive. When I first saw the gleam in Alan's eye I knew he was going to try and sue the National Guard. "Ah yes, " I thought. "Alan loves to take on the government." I was happy. I like it when people question the government. It keeps them on their toes. Unfortunately, what I didn't see coming was another comment against the war in Iraq. For the record, I think every soldier should be pulled out of Iraq and brought home. The entire thing is a ridiculous quagmire and I am embarrassed that my government is responsible for making it happen. That being said, I am really sick of hearing those same sentiments from Alan Shore!

Moving on to other annoying plotlines, I was incensed by Shirley's granddaughter. As before, I am a huge fan of civil disobedience. There were many times in high school when I felt like acting out against injustice the same way Marlena did. What stopped me was a fear of the consequences. Marlena knew there would be consequences to her actions and she had to know that those consequences would be expulsion. Someone please explain to me how the girl expects to stay in school when she can't even apologize for what she did or, more importantly, why she would even want to.

I know that the American education system is broken and has been for some time now but, for me, and many parents like me, there is no alternative. We're not fortunate enough to afford private school or home schooling so we send our kids off to the next best thing. However, if you want your kids to get a decent education, it can't stop there. If Marlena and her parents aren't happy with the education she's receiving then it's their responsibility to do something about it, something more effective and a little less selfish than suing the school to let her back in.

One last thing about Marlena. If she gets a job at Crane, Poole & Schmidt and I have to listen to a slew of dirty old man comments from Denny, I'll issue my own fatwa.

Boston LegalThe cherry on top was Carl's threat to move back to New York. Are the writers of Boston Legal actually trying to get me to stop watching? Because writing off John Larroquette is a good way to succeed.

So, Lorraine was a madam. Whew, what a relief. I thought maybe she was going to say she had actually done something illegal that could put the firm at risk for malpractice...Wait a minute!

I hate to say it but overall, this was a terrible episode. There were a few things I liked...Henry Gibson was hilarious as always, Steve Hytner was great as the impassioned principal and Denny and Alan trying to enlist was pretty funny. At least Carl decided to stay.

Do you think Marlena should be a regular cast member?
Yes56 (30.8%)
No126 (69.2%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

15 Comments

Filter by:
Alicia

Yes, I am complaining that at the age of 7, in the first grade that he has at least an hour of homework on top of his 8 hours of school work.

I remember having 2-2 1/2 hours also... but not in Elementary School.

December 14 2007 at 10:27 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MB Harrington

I have a small concern with a comment made by Alan Shore (James Spader) at the conclusion balcony scene of this episode. Mr. Shore commented that volunteerism in the United States is on the rise. While statistically this may be true, in actuality while more individuals are volunteering (especially for one-time "save the world on a Saturday morning" projects) than ever before they are actually volunteering less hours. Two items fuel non-profits, donations and volunteers and since 80% of the people that volunteer for an organization, donate to that organization it stands to reason that nonprofits desperately need a continual army of volunteers. I know the writers were attempting to make a point however, comments like that can often backfire and make potential volunteers assume they are not needed. Thanks for the chance to vent a bit.

December 13 2007 at 9:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Alicia

I thought this episode was a little preachy too. And as for Iraq... I get it. It doesn't matter how we got there, we are there and we need to deal with it. We need to finish what was started and stop complaining about it.

Anyway... back to the episode, for as much as the Nat'l Guard thing got on my nerve (It just wasn't funny. It just wan't good as it has been in previous episodes. IT. WASN'T. FUNNY.) I thought the No Child Left Behind was NICE... it is about time someone... anyone publicly said that NCLB is the WORST education bill to be passed in this country. Teachers teach tests... period. There really isn't time for the kids to unwind... my son in the first grade has 1 hour of homework a night on average. He is 7!

So um... that part was good.

December 13 2007 at 8:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Alicia's comment
Akbar Fazil

while I agree that NCLB is terrible, you are complaining of 1 hour of homework? That seems low to me. I always had 2+ every night (an hour when I got home and then an hour after dinner usually)

December 13 2007 at 2:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ekkostar

Thanks for giving me false hope that that HORRIBLE Carl Sack was going to leave. I've been supporting John Larroquette to get the boot since he came on. It looks like it's going to be a long, long time before I like his ass again.

COME ON, JOHN, GET OFF THIS SHOW! IT'S CRAP AND YOU ARE PLAYING A CRAP CHARACTER!

December 13 2007 at 8:25 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John Howard

So you saw immediately that he was going to sue the National Guard, but you didn't see a comment on the Iraq War coming? Are you a little slow?

And I'm with Shawn, these things do need to be discussed. Keeping these issues confined to news programs (what little actual news there still is) obviously isn't working. If we could get similar social commentary into an American Idol episode somehow, maybe we wouldn't be stuck in the mess we're in.

December 12 2007 at 2:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to John Howard's comment
SV

Thank you for responding to BL's message. I have been searching for over 30 min for some response to last night's synopsis of USA, 2007. So what the plot was not well developed: the messages needed to be verbalized. It is doubly sad and one more symptom of this disaster called Bush's America that the only venue presenting these messages is a soapy drama. What else did we throw out w/habius corpus?

December 13 2007 at 4:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jukin

I have to agree with most of the posters here - last night crossed a line. Although I don't typically agree with most of the positions that are put forth on BL, I do enjoy the way they take their shots at the White House and poke fun at long standing policies. But last night the quick jabs became a full force bludgeoning! I've watched a lot of David E. Kelley's shows but I'm about ready to stop. Lately Kelley seems to be morphing into Michael Moore and trust me when I say, we don't need TWO of him!!! We don't even need one of him but we're stuck with him!

If David E. Kelley continues to shove his political agenda down our throats I'll be watching something else on Tuesday nights. I want to be entertained and informed, not subjected to a weekly tirade of ranting and bitching by the "morally superior" David E. Kelley.

December 12 2007 at 2:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
malren

*sigh* Quagmire. Always the indicator that someone gets their news primarily from left-wing blogs. We're actually *succeeding* in Iraq right now thanks to Petraeus, so...whatever.

I stopped watching BL this week. I've had enough of DLK's bullshit. We all know he hates 50% of this country. We frigging GET IT. All Republicans are stupid and evil, the government is corrupt and wants to kill all minorities, WE GET IT. We know where you stand, David. You can't stand anyone who isn't a far left Hollywood Democrat. WE. GET. IT. You've ruined watching Shats and Spader for me, and now I will *never again* hear your "message" because you chose to convey it like a three year old with a bullhorn.

December 12 2007 at 1:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Shawn

i disagree with most of you.
these topics need to be brought up and discussed.
and even if you don't agree with the point of view expressed in the show. it doesn't matter. it makes you think about it.
why would you complain about that?
sounds like you bitch too much paul?
you are looking for something to dislike.

December 12 2007 at 12:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Zachary

Can we forbid the writers from ever including a teenage character again?
I don't know what Marlena's deal was. Was she actually smart and just acting naive or was she really as clueless as she seemed?
If she becomes a regular, I refuse to watch her scenes.

December 12 2007 at 12:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Oreo

Yeah the preaching this week crossed a line. I still enjoyed the episode, but when preaching reaches this level all I can do is roll my eyes.

I like the part where Denney goes "You are a democrat, you are supposed to criticize and not offer an alternative". :)

December 12 2007 at 11:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners