Could Leno actually get the better of Letterman tonight?
As you may know, the late night shows (Letterman, Leno, Kimmel, O'Brien, and Ferguson) return with new episodes tonight. Most of them will return without writers (and will be picketed), but Letterman made a special deal with the WGA and his show will return with his writers. Many assume this gives Letterman an advantage (he can do a regular show while the others scramble with ad libbing, longer interviews, filler), but Tim Goodman thinks that Letterman might actually be hurt by having his writers.
His reasoning? It's going to be too safe for Letterman.
Goodman writes:
After tonight, who knows what Leno will do. Or Kimmel or Conan. That's part of the intrigue. Though it's fashionable to say Letterman has an advantage starting tonight, he's also at something of a disadvantage creatively, although that might seem contrary to expectations. But think about it. You know what Letterman is like with writers and guests. He's certainly the dean of late-night talk show hosts but there's something truly electric about him when he's out of his element, less safe. Tonight he's going to be surrounded by down pillows and lullabies.
I don't know if I completely agree with Goodman, but I can picture a scenario where Letterman does a "regular" show, and it will either stand out as being much, much better than what's going on over at Leno, Kimmel, and O'Brien's studios, or people could look at it and say "you mean Letterman actually has a full staff of writers and this is all he could come up with? The other shows are handling it better."
I think Letterman will be Letterman, and you'll either like him or you won't, regardless of any strike that's going on and what the other shows are going to do. Though I will admit that I think expectations for Letterman doing a "better" show tonight might be a little high.

13 Comments