Powered by i.TV
May 21, 2013

The Simpsons: That 90's Show

by Richard Keller, posted Jan 27th 2008 11:00PM

Kurt Loder reports on the untimely breakup of Sadgasm(S19E11) "This is Kurt Loder, reporting from the 90's" -- Kurt Loder as Kurt Loder

Ladies and gentleman, as a change of pace I will be debating myself during this week's review of The Simpsons.

Rich: Hello, everyone and welcome to this week's review of The Simpsons. I would have to say that, overall, this episode was entertaining and really grabbed the essence of what the 1990's was all about.

Rich: HA!

Rich: Excuse me?

Rich: You heard me. I said HA! This wasn't entertaining at all. In fact, this week's installment was downright infuriating!

Rich: Why, pray tell, would you say that, Rich? I mean, it's only a cartoon for Pete's sake. Why so emotional?

Rich: One word: continuity

Rich: Huh?

Rich: Oh, come on! Like you don't know what I'm talking about. I mean, you are me.

Rich: Explain it to me.

Rich: Oh, all right. You see, with this week's episode, in which we flashback to the 1990's and a dating Homer and Marge, the whole continuity of the series was totally blown. Well, at least whatever continuity there was.

Rich: Ah, you're talking about all of the other flashback episodes that established how Marge and Homer came to be and how the family emerged.

Rich: Right! I'm a purist in many ways, and for me the season two episode "The Way We Was" established the time frame of when Marge and Homer got together.

Rich: You mean, 1974.

Rich: Correct. From there the timeline was followed pretty well, with Bart and Lisa being born in the 1980's, and Maggie somewhere in the early 1990's. Now, it looks like the whole history has been retconned.

Rich: Retconned? What the hell does that mean?

Rich: Retroactive continuity. It's in Wikipedia, dummy. Why don't you read sometime!

Rich: Oh, you mean like the way DC Comics re-established the origins of Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman back in the 1980's.

Rich: Yep. Although I don't know how many of your readers out there peruse comics. So, I would say it was more like the reworking of the new version of Battlestar Galactica or Bionic Woman.

Rich: Got it. Continue.

Rich: Well, with this week's episode the whole Homer-Marge relationship was retconned nearly 20 years, putting their first meeting somewhere in the mid- to late-1980's. That pretty much voids any other flashback episodes they ever did!

Rich: Who cares? Like I said, it's a friggin' cartoon!

Rich: I care, and so do plenty of fans out there who have watched the old episodes dozens of times and consider them rote. There is very little continuity when it comes to The Simpsons that we try to hold on to whatever there is at the moment.

Rich: All right, I can almost see your point here. But, do you really think the writers had any choice in this?

Rich: Explain.

Rich: They were going for a feel of the 90's, of young singles, of the Grunge, um, revolution. By putting Homer and Marge in this scenario as their later selves that would have ruined the imagery.

Rich: Well, sure, but...

Rich: Add to that the fact that Homer is perpetually near 40 and Bart is always a youthful 10. In order to put them in this time something had to be done. If not, then they would have had to say that the Simpson family were actually older than they were.

Rich: Okay, well you have a point there. Still...

Rich: Plus, you have a bunch of new fans out there as a result of the success of The Simpsons Movie that may have never seen "The Way We Was" or any of those other ones. Or, they may have forgotten about them. So, this is all brand new to them.

Rich: Okay, okay, you've made your point! I don't agree with it, but I understand.

Rich: Well, I'm glad. So, you're saying that there wasn't anything you enjoyed about this week's episode?

Rich: Well, I have to admit I did enjoy how Homer went from being a white, R&B, smooth jazz signer to a grunge rocker. It was also fun to see and hear all of the 90's references. The one that was my favorite was Kirk telling Luann that a picture of her cheating on him would download to his computer in six hours as long as no one picked up the phone.

Rich: I was glad to see Weird Al making another appearance on the show and doing a parody of Homer's grunge classic. That harkens back to the actual parody he made of Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit". There were also some nice references to Zima, Seinfeld (sponge-worthy), Melrose Place and the fact that Comic Book Guy said that The Lord of the Rings could never be made into a movie. And, we did get one additional piece of information about Marge: she was a college graduate from Springfield University.

Rich: I particularly like Bart's mention that he never even heard of the 90's. Then, there was Homer's mention that Matt Groening was working hard on launching a show called Futurama. Although, that show began in March of 1999, so I don't know if that would really be part of the 90's or not.

Rich: Well, do you do have a point on that one. See, we're not as different as you think.

Rich: I know. Can you forgive me?

Rich: Of course I can.

Rich: You are the man.

Rich: No, you are the man.

Rich: Let's just agree that we are both the man.

Rich: So true.

Fin

How do you feel about The Simpsons re-establishing the Homer-Marge timeline
I'm pissed off! They destroyed what little continuity the show had.568 (32.4%)
I'm not happy with it, but I could understand why they did it.401 (22.8%)
I'm happy that they made the change, since it keeps the show fresh for new ideas.387 (22.1%)
I don't care one way or another.399 (22.7%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

45 Comments

Filter by:
joe

from what i have seen in the earlier parts of the episode, marge commented that parents are also entitled to keeping secrets, or something like that...


so,if we were to strictly follow the little to non-existent timeline of the simpsons and to treat this cartoon like it was "real", it is possible that most of what happened or shown in "the way we was" was partly true (it was a story/flashback right?, who are we to say that they were entirely the truth?)..

lets not forget that this cartoon universe exists in a floating timeline, so having Bart born in the 80's wouldn't really makes sense because he's 10 and it's 2008. I think this was their way of updating the show...

i also liked the way they wrapped up the '90s. i for one think this episode was for the fans that watched the show during the era..

April 09 2008 at 8:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
drew

What? This episode does not change the continuity any more than any of the other flashbacks did. At least this episode explained why there were +5 years between when Homer and Marge graduated from HS and when Bart was conceived.

February 17 2008 at 9:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ado rimbo

I think that the saddest thing about this episode is that it clearly marks the end of any social relevance the Simpsons ever had. Not that there was much left to begin with, but now we can rest assured it is gone for good.
Part of what I felt was so poignant about the original Marge-Homer story is that it depicted the life of two working class kids who fucked up, were disillusioned with their lives, but somehow managed to keep a semi-happy life for their family. Marge was the smart girl who never made it out of small town, working class life. Homer was forced into a miserable job from the get go to survive. They represented a great fuck you to the pedantic establishment of the 90's that claimed to have delivered prosperity to the doors of all Americans. Marge and Homer were among those left behind.
The humor came from the very real problems of a working class marriage that consistently failed to make ends meet, unable to cope with anger, regret, and disappointment. This gave the show both its edge and its humanity.
Now this has been dropped for bland middle-class respectability. Marge makes it to College. She is no longer the knocked-up smart girl forced into marriage to a good guy with no future. Homer loses his whole past to serve the purpose of a dumb pop parody of Grunge.
Now, when they eventually get married, it will be made to look as a choice, rather than a desperate attempt to cover up a life-changing mistake. Surrendering the working class roots of the show, have given up their identity, exchanging scathing social critiques and sincere humanity for the vacuous pop irony that fuels Family Guy. This I'm sure, will allow them to connect to the new breed of fans who care very little for social issues and live for random pop references.

February 01 2008 at 12:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ashley Boyd

Moan about retconning as much as you like, but Lisa had a point. Homer is near-40, and Bart is 10. There is no way they had him just after they graduated, unless they graduated in their late 20s.

January 31 2008 at 3:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Peregrine

Personally I loved the episode, even as a huge Simpsons fan from the beginning. I don't look at it as somehow tossing out the old history, basically look at it as a one-off episode that doesn't necessarily have any permanent impact on the history of the show. We're seeing a lot of those in recent years. I just felt it was a great episode compared to many in the uneven last few years of the show - good emotion between Marge and Homer, Homer's amazing grunge songs, and 90s references galore.

Remember as Lisa memorably said to Bart - "It seems like every week something odd happens to the Simpsons. My advice is to ride it out, make an occasional smart-aleck quip and by next week we'll be back where we started from, ready for another wacky adventure"

January 31 2008 at 6:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jesse

I thought it was a funny episode, and that the retcon was itself one of the funnier bits in it. I just wish they could have really addled up the continuity by, say, having a Sadgasm fan ask Homer to sign an old Be Sharps album...

January 30 2008 at 10:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robert

Has anyone mentioned the Behind the Laughter episode spoofing VH1? It showed us that the Simpsons we watch is actually a fictional world within another fictional world of cartoon actors playing the characters in the Simpsons. Arguably the most recent episode was not inconsistent with our continuity because we are actually watching the fictional "real world" cartoon actors playing Simpsons. Now, if you were in the fictional "real world" as part of the cartoon audience you should be bitter that they screwed up continuity. Actually, they should do another meta-espisode with fictional "real world" Simpsons discussing the re-boot of the Simpsons continuity.

January 29 2008 at 12:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Eric H

Why does everyone insist the time line was changed, this is an obvious one shot episode that will probably never be mentioned again. Did I miss where all of Homer's money went? It seems like tis was a one shot and wont be mentioned again, I took it like that and enjoyed the episode very much.

January 29 2008 at 8:52 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
XanZan

Next thing you know, people will be getting angry and saying that they "retconned" Weird Al's songs.

January 29 2008 at 8:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Miranda

What I hated about this episode, in addition to the fact that they flushed all continuity down the toilet, is that it just wasn't very good. Yeah, it had funny moments, but the story just didn't hold together the way earlier episodes did (like, say, anything from seasons 2-12 or so).

OK, sure, you have to suspend disbelief if you're going to watch a show for 18 years (holy crap) but not have any of the characters age at all. But a show can still have its own internal continuity, and that's now gone.

Not to be all Comic Book Guy about it, but it's just annoying.

January 29 2008 at 3:38 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners