AI OD: How to fix The Idol

by Jason Hughes, posted Feb 7th 2008 3:27PM
I get that American Idol is a ratings juggernaut, but come on! In the first few seasons we got a couple weeks or so of these good and bad early round auditions and then it was off to the races, but now we get a solid month. A sprint of fun turned into a marathon. Thank god they spotlighted more of the good singers this year than last, but it's still way way too long! I was ready to move on to Hollywood by week three. And we get one episode of "Hollywood Week" and then the infamous "Chair" episode that reveals the Top 24.

These kids are in Hollywood for a solid week. They call it "Hell Week." It's rife with personal drama, tons of practice and work every day. There's over 100 of the so-called "good" contestants struggling to make a good impression with most of them failing miserably. Lots of attitude and emotions. And this year they get to perform with instruments. Why don't you give me some more time on that? It's okay, though. I've figured out how to fix the whole thing.

Ratings each year have shown that viewers tend to slip away as these round one auditions drag on only to start returning when the voting starts with the Top 24. Wouldn't you think the folks at Idol would want to try and correct this? Why be satisfied with a negative ratings pattern year after year? Luckily it is easily corrected. In the first season, all the early buzz for the whole show was about those horrible auditions because nothing like that had really been done before. It was funny and hilarious and helped put Idol on the map.

But after seven seasons, we've seen just about every variation of bad singer and judge's response there is, so we certainly don't need to spend the first month of each season with them. Idol visits seven cities for two days each (on average). This could be covered in two to three weeks of two hour episodes; you can easily cover three to three and a half cities in a week.

First, cut out all the filler and background crap on the singers and move through the auditions faster. Let me explain why. When you give us background story information on the bad singers, it's pointless. Take the most recent example from "The Best of the Rest" episode. The whole Three's Company schtick. The story was stupid and all three contestants were terrible. The only thing it had going for it was they were good-looking and the girl's line to Simon that if he put her through to Hollywood he could have anything he wanted. Did we need extra footage of them posing and being goofy outside? How much time did we waste on that story and in the end it is completely inconsequential. Meanwhile, there are singers who will make the Top 24 we still haven't even seen.

As for the good singers, one of the biggest complaints contestants have after we get to the Top 24 is that "so-and-so got more face time before we got to Hollywood, so America 'knows' them better and that's why I got voted out." You know what? There's some truth to that. Let's face it, we are going to remember people who've gotten more camera time and who've had some of their back-story revealed. Who remembers Asiah? But each year there are several people who make the Top 24 and the first time we ever even see their faces on the show or hear them sing is when we start voting. That's not right.

This year's "Hollywood Week" happened several weeks ago now and the folks behind the Idol machine already know who's in the Top 24, right? Okay, now that we've trimmed "Round One" to two or three weeks, we're ready for Phase Two. Two weeks on "Hell Week," three of the contestants wrapped up with the "chair" episode. There are over 100 contestants in Hollywood and 24 of them are going to become our Top 24. By the time these episodes air, producers already know the Top 24, so it behooves them to ensure all 24 of those people get at least some face time with the home audience. It gives them an opportunity to show the audience at home why they made the Top 24, and the audience at home more options of people to get excited about and tune in for.

So as to not give the Top 24 away, you show a whole bunch more of the people who almost make it, too. I can promise you that America won't be mad. In fact, they'll get even more enthusiastic about it because they'll know they've seen the entire Top 24 throughout the "Hell Week" episodes and the fun will be in trying to guess which ones will make it. Then when we do get to the "chair" episode you don't have to make an effort to show us in flashback sequences what John Q. Idol did before you tell him he's in the Top 24 because this is the first time we've ever seen him.

So You Think You Can Dance had a great summer run, their best one yet. Ratings were good and critics were raving. And the success it had with connecting its contestants to the audience at home was a large factor in the so-called "changes" Idol is making this year. One of the things Dance did right was show us all the great dancers before they revealed the finalists. That way when they walked out on stage to see if they were going to be on the show, we'd been on this journey with them up to this point and had an emotional stake in their fate. It's not some stranger we've never seen before.

If I'm John Q. Idol and I'm up against Danny Noriega in the first round and that night is the first time anyone's heard me sing, I'm scared to death. Ryan's little chats with me during the show are the first time anyone's heard me talk, but everyone remembers little Danny Noriega from the early round episodes and probably the Hollywood rounds. Oh, he's so cute and remember how they told us he tried out before and his little nerves got to him. Oh, let's vote for Danny. "What about John Q. Idol? He was pretty good." Who? Oh the guy with the ... yeah I don't really remember him.

It's an easy fix, it will keep the audience more interested in the entire run of the show, help the audience connect more with all of the contestants before the first vote is cast, and humanize the contestants more, too. The fans have more people to get excited about from the first voting episode and more of a connection to keep them coming back week after week. It's a brilliant solution and I should get a Pulitzer Prize for it. Or at least an Emmy? Hell, I'd settle for a Razzie.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

12 Comments

Filter by:
marsha

i loved the show but it has turned into a popularity contest not a singing contest. the kids with the dreadlocks should have gone a long time ago he cant sing. i think that they should be judged all along by the people that know about singing not popularity. the other show use judges not the american people who most dont know a thing about singing.

April 23 2008 at 12:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jeliwobble

I actually agree in the most part with your summation (and I adore SYTYCD). I would say, however, that the majority of people watch Idol for the road crashes, Simon's acerbic put-downs and Paula's skirting round telling someone they're terrible which usually ends up with her being completely unintelligible.

I think if we had the three weeks still full of road crashes (with the agreed less back stories) and then have your Hollywood week concentrating on the 58 best (from whom the final 24 get chosen) we will have the suspense you're after and it should freshen up what is becoming a tired franchise.

February 28 2008 at 12:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
torry

I agree with the writer of this article. I for one have not watched A.I this season thus far because I did not want to sit through the auditions. Get on with the show already! And it is true that we are always thrown off by someone who was not showcased on the audition shows, and that throws the viewer off. Good call.

February 08 2008 at 3:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ORKMommy

I totally agree with everything Jason said. I watch because I enjoy the show, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be better. I would much rather watch a few weeks of Hollywood than 4 weeks of auditions. Most of the time during the auditions phase, I have the TV on while I'm doing other things. Most people I know who watch do the same thing.

Just because it's on my TV and I count for the 1 of the 30 million doesn't mean I'm watching it or don't want them to show me something different.

February 08 2008 at 11:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jim

Jason, there's nothing wrong with American Idol. It appeals to different people (thankfully, for the advertisers, lots of them) at different times for different reasons.

You spend so much time deconstructing the show, you seem to have lost sight of the fact that it is *entertaining.* If I fault the show at all, it's because it's susceptible to the "vote for the worst" mentality. (See Sanjaya.)

February 08 2008 at 6:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
vacelts

Everyone talked about how the auditions were the best part of AI so I tuned in this year. I'm not impressed. I prefer to watch from Hollywood on.

http://redlightnaps.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/american-idol-7-auditions/

February 08 2008 at 12:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Marian

I've always thought it would be interesting if America chose the bottom 3 each week, with one being safe. Then the bottom 2 would be allowed to perform again then the judges would pick who stays or goes.
ps. I want a cut of the profits!!

February 07 2008 at 11:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Marian's comment
Oreo

Do you watch "So you think you can dance?" buy any chance? That shows change the way it votes all the time, and it does it that way, for part of the season.

February 07 2008 at 11:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Stigmata

WHY on earth would the network 'FIX' a show thats ranked #1 by a huge margin? who do you think you are?
what makes you qualified enough to 'fix' a show thats raking in 30 million plus viewers , twice weekly?
are you kidding me? do you think anyone at fox (including the janitors) are going to take you seriously?

maybe they'll slap you 30 million times, one for each viewer, to get their point across!!

February 07 2008 at 10:58 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Oreo

The ratings are 30-35 million people watching a week. Even if they drop 50% (which the drops are like 10% tops) it will still be the numbe rone show on TV.

So why fix it if it ain't broken.

February 07 2008 at 6:50 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brian

Haha yeah exactly, I just like watching crappy people get criticized. After the top 24 is announced who cares. Fox must be realizing this and making a compromise.

February 07 2008 at 6:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners