Powered by i.TV
June 19, 2013

The Sarah Connor Chronicles: Dungeons & Dragons - VIDEO

by Brad Trechak, posted Feb 18th 2008 11:09PM
The Sarah Connor Chronicles(S01E06) This episode was a definitive step up for the series. I have one or two minor quibbles about it, but this episode has been the highlight so far.

The viewer is presented with the story of Derek Reese, who is Kyle Reese's brother and John Connor's uncle. This is done in the style of "future-flashes" in which we see Derek's story post-Judgment Day and learn a lot of new information that answers some questions and creates a few more. I also got a little nerdy thrill out of myriad of references to the first Terminator movie (more on that shortly).

I should have recognized the set used for the Resistance shelter. Was the "Hang In There Baby" lion picture in the first movie? If so, I don't recall it. I did like how they retouched the Linda Hamilton photo to put in Lena Headey's image instead. It's like one those time changes from the movie Back To The Future in which you see time changing around the travelers.

CameronThis actor change did not stop with Sarah Connor. Kyle Reese also changed actors for the future-flashes. No doubt Michael Biehn was similarly unaffordable. Thankfully, they didn't show future-John (except for a segment at the end in a shadow that is obviously Thomas Dekker who plays John at 16). I think showing another actor as future-John would not have been good for continuity, which is shaky enough as it is.

For those who didn't notice, there were a LOT of references to the first Terminator movie. The used several lines directly from that movie, including the last line "There's a storm coming". The future-flashes happen around the future-flashes of that movie. I do admit I miss the mountain of human skulls that were shown in the first movie, but there were probably budgetary concerns.

We now know what Derek Reese was doing when the Terminator attack from the first movie was going on. He was kidnapped (alongside future Andy Goode, who looks very similar to his young self) and used for some nefarious Skynet purpose which I could not discern. What was Skynet doing to those humans anyway? My guess is creating casts for Terminator bodies.

CharlieNotice that the Terminator keeping the resistance fighters hostage was one of the old style ones with the rubber face that Kyle referred to in the first movie. He described the type as "easy to spot". I'm glad the producers of the show are doing their homework in that regard.

And somehow in the middle of all this is Sarah's ex, Charlie. Charlie learns (almost) the whole story of Sarah and John. It would be a good send-off to the character but somehow I think he's going to turn up again. Probably dead.

Derek ReeseI did notice that the girl suicide at John's school wasn't mentioned in the episode, thankfully. I'm sure we'll go back to it, but most of this episode dealt with the future-flashes and Charlie. Agent Ellison wasn't around either.

Then, of course, there is the issue of Andy Goode. We now know that Derek Reese killed him, yet in doing so we now have another chronological paradox. If Andy was killed in the present, he could not exist in the future. So what's the deal?

TerminatorAnd the final coup-de-grace of the episode: what's up with Cameron? They all but set up her own turn to evil in the future-flash when one of the captured Terminators revert back to shooting people and Cameron responds after defeating it, "Sometimes they go bad. We don't know why." In the next scene, she's pocketing the CPU of the fallen Terminator. Is Cameron a double-agent of Skynet?

I liked the juxtaposition in the story of Cameron hacking up the Terminator from last episode while John is nursing Uncle Derek back to health. My favorite Cameron quote from the episode: "He's not a guy. He's a scary robot."

So we're left wondering what event will turn Cameron down the road of Connor-killing machine. My guess is that she'll have sex with John and in a perfect moment of happiness will lose her soul. But I could be wrong.

A very good episode. I hope they'll make more like this before its inevitable cancellation.

Did Derek Reese killing Andy Goode change the future?
Yes, now we now have another timeline to deal with490 (77.3%)
No, Andy Goode isn't dead144 (22.7%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

66 Comments

Filter by:
vesper

Re: Derek recognizing Cameron -- I figured she (or a duplicate model of her) was involved in whatever happened to him in the basement?

Great discussion points on here! This episode was the first one that made me want to go back and rewatch the first movie -- just rented it and must say I really enjoy the details they picked up for this episode, like the photo, the way the flash-forwards in both are so intertwined, the rubber-skinned models, all the quotes.

If the Connors do fess up to Derek that he's the uncle, it would be so bittersweet for Sarah to be able to talk to someone who knows Kyle so well and who was with him so recently!

February 23 2008 at 6:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Vincent

What exactly are her adaptation / learning skills ?

Arnold T1 was a t800, the safe house t888 after falling scanned Cameron and his HUD read: unknown model. And I felt she beat him badly during the evasion sequence, he never stood a chance against her (except at one point she is down and he could fire at Derek...). Is Cameron a more evolved model than he was (t888+) ? Fox lists her as a TOK715 according to wikipedia.

However as she stood by the fire we saw she has a similar endoskeleton, and her skin was damaged in the first episode. So she cannot be a t1000. Cameron obviously can mimic human demeanor much better than other terminators we have seen until now. And she draws less human attention than t800 t888.

Does Cameron really have a learning curve ? Could this modify her secondary priorities so as to be more efficient in achieving the all mighty priority number one ?

For example Sarah s unnecessarily mean behavior towards a helping terminator both Hurts (if possible) and makes Cameron think Sarah could become a liability to her mission. If her entire software (including mission and program learning skills) is read and write (as has been discussed in the first pages on this thread), then she could rewrite it to exclude Sarah demands (after all if we are to trust her she claimed to follow future john s orders). Maybe she did just that in a millisecond when she lied to Sarah: 'i swear'

So Cameron s choices could be affected by Sarah unnecessary aggressiveness, leading them to a future dispute over present John Connor. Hence the pseudo oedipus complex including a cybernetic organism. Weird ?

And i wonder was the safe house terminator really destroyed ? We did not witness the metal melt down. Only what seemed like dust when Sarah arrived. I thought Cameron used too little thermite, and she stood nearby as it began to burn, without burning her own skin. And remember she wanted the doctor out of there...

Maybe this potential rewrite of the secondary priorities include a squad of good terminators, helping her keep the only vital human element John Connor as long as possible. Hence why she pocketed the cpu chipset: maybe she will try and reprogram it in one future episode. She never sleeps.


A few more questions:

Why would Derek lie about killing Andy Goode ?

How can Derek recognize Cameron (or a similar model to her) the first time he enters the captured factory in the future ? And he definitely seemed to fear her when awakening after the blood transfusion.

Are Jet engines needed to make the time machine work ? Don t they have enough (nuclear) energy as it is ?

The time continuity problem has to be addressed: is this a paradox / multi parallel or a fate universe ?

February 22 2008 at 1:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
AQ

It is true that Andy Goode was killed in our present, but it is not true that he could not have existed in the future because what he did in the future had already happened, and his skynet program was already in existance (and maybe stolen) *before* he was killed in our present. Suppose our present is 1942, and suppose Hitler killed your grandparents in 1941, you would not get them back by killing Hitler in 1942.

AQ

February 21 2008 at 5:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cameron

althought we do not know if John sent Cameron back...

February 21 2008 at 1:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Cameron's comment
Vincent

Granted we saw in this episode Cameron being close to future John, but nothing indeed proves he sent her. Time traveling affects time chronology, or skynet may have retaken the time machine facility in their future and sent her as a sleeping cell to undo future John plans.

Or her memory could be affected and she could just go bad.

The point of my previous post is she could very well be lying to John himself, if telling him the truth could hurt her main programmed priority.

February 21 2008 at 5:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Vincent

Cameron lied to Sarah when pocketing Cromartie cpu instead of destroying it !

I knew she was going to do something shady. That development makes her the most interesting character imho. I agree with those who stated the possibilities of learning curve (Cameron) and oedipus complex (Sarah John Cameron). More on that later.

What is Cameron s mission ?

She could be a sleeping cell of skynet, waiting the very last moment in april 2011 to make her move and ensure skynet is created. Possible but improbable, as future John Connor sent her in the past.

How is she programmed to achieve her mission ?

I think it s safe to assume her software is written in term of priorities:
1- Save John Connor
2- Save Humanity if it does no interfere with priority 1
3- Do not harm human beings only if it does not interfere with priorities 1 and 2
... And so on

So the evolution of the series (already in an alternate timeline from the movie franchise) could be greatly affected by the definition of the priorities as chosen by future John Connor.

If he is as noble as portrayed in the future, Cameron s main objective could be to save humanity then save John Connor. This could prove decisive in april 2011 when they fight the awakening of skynet: he could become expandable.

However if he made a mistake and chose to program Cameron to save his past self, then she could try and save him instead of destroying skynet at all cost, resulting in judgment day.

Therefore i am wondering what is Cameron main priority ?

February 21 2008 at 12:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Vincent's comment
Vincent

Erratum: she pocketed the safe house terminator's cpu.

And Cameron may just lie even to present day John...

February 22 2008 at 1:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cameron

I agree with the poster who asked why the terminator would leave an axe and allow the "prisoners" to escape. I was kicking around the idea that it was their own people doing it. I am very curious to see if the basement is explianed later. If they were harvesting thier blood and cells, why would they not then just kill them when done. Also, they kept seeing the jet engines for the time machine being hauled off. Was this maybe the resistence fighters taking the equipment from the installment they took from the machines?

February 21 2008 at 9:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bruce

Burning flesh smells so bad that it might draw attention to wherever they were hiding out.

February 20 2008 at 3:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Boomstick

Lots of comments on how can Skynet be created if Derek murders Andy Goode.

Andy Goode said that he was part of a team that created Skynet. The team still exists even if Andy Goode is dead now. Or the team WILL exist? Either way, I think the writing was meant to illustrate Skynet as a hydra. Chop off one head, and 5 more grow back in it's place.

As the show progresses, and the characters begin to prune the future from information that they have, I think the future will take a different direction.

After it is a series. If they had killed Andy Goode and effectively destroyed Skynet that would be the end of the series.

Did anyone else have a problem with Cameron disposing of the terminator endoskeleton? Why bother cutting the flesh from the skeleton? At 2500 degrees wouldn't it burn also? At 2500 degrees wouldn't her skin also burn?

The heat from burning the endoskeleton illuminated Cameron's face for some eerie foreshadowing or dramatic effect. Whatever it was supposed to be, the effect fell flat.

Is it just me or do these types of dramatic ploys in the show distract the viewer from any form of suspension of disbelief? If they would just hire a seventh grade science teacher to help them with some of their science I think the viewer might actually be able to pay attention to the plot rather than the bad science.

February 20 2008 at 11:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Boomstick's comment
Walt

Even fake flesh probably shouldn't be burned, with thermite or any other method. It's a waste of your thermite and wasn't essential for the destruction of the advanced tech. That said, I've never attempted to burn flesh with thermite.

The show's budget prevents really good special effects -- if you've never seen the spoof episodes of StargateSG1, one of them had "Make the explosions BIGGER!" like they were saying "More Cowbell!" because the director is wanting better effects, and the special effects techs can only do so much.

But yeah, some things like not moving away from a thermite burn is for dramatic effect and moves into the realm of "CSI science" where the science facts are sometimes tossed away for the dramatic license.

February 20 2008 at 12:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
T100

@Andy Goode being alive:

Those where Derek's memories of a future he knew before he went back and changed it. That's why Andy is there, but now he wont be.

February 20 2008 at 11:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ryan

In Queen's Gambit, when Sarah chases down Derek after she sees Andy dead, didn't he tell her that Andy was dead before he got there? If so, how does that jive with the last scene showing Derek shooting Andy?

February 20 2008 at 1:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Ryan's comment
Earl

He lied.

February 20 2008 at 8:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners