Powered by i.TV
October 25, 2014

TV 101: The Day the Music Died (or, how the second season of The Real World ruined everything)

by Jay Black, posted Feb 18th 2008 12:02PM
This is the true story... Chuck Klosterman, in his very excellent Sex Drugs and Cocoa Puffs, wrote an essay about The Real World: San Francisco. He said that the third season of The Real World was the moment the series stopped reflecting youth culture and started creating youth culture.

I'm not going to argue with Mr. Klosterman. I admire him so much that for a short while, I thought he was my own Tyler Durden (all the ways I wish I could be -- that's Chuck). If we are, however, to take Klosterman's argument as truth -- that Puck and Pedro realizing the cameras were on them was the TV equivalent of Skynet becoming self-aware and destroying humanity -- we must then look to the second season of the show as the moment when Miles Dyson started working for Cyberdyne. That is, the seeds for television's unraveling were sown not during the third season of The Real World, but during the second. As 2008 is the 15th anniversary of The Real World: Los Angeles, I thought it might be a good idea to take a look back at how it managed to ruin everything...

First, let me say this: I don't hate all reality TV. I don't think that there's something intrinsically bad about setting up an interesting situation and then letting the cameras roll. Les Stroud surviving in the desert; Lance Loud taking his mother to a drag show; David Letterman throwing watermelons off a roof: these are the things that television was created for.

That said, there's a lot of stuff that calls itself "reality television" that I would jettison into space if I didn't worry that the aliens who found it would think less of us. Whereas the promise of the genre's name is that we're going to see something "real", in practice the word I most often think of while I'm watching reality TV is contrived.

Put it this way: if watching a documentary is the equivalent of pulling back the curtains on a neighbor's house while he makes love to his wife, then watching Reality TV is like putting on a gang-bang porno. Sure, the lighting might be better, but the sense of voyeurism in watching porno is inversely proportional to the amount of orchestration in it. Or, you know, so I've been told by the kinds of sick perverts who watch that stuff.

To push this porn metaphor further (and to increase my own, Dimaggio-like streak of at least one strained metaphor per column), The Real World: Los Angeles is like the New Years Eve party at Jack Horner's house [link mildly NSFW], from Boogie Nights. Except instead of Little Bill's brains being splattered everywhere, it's the soul of the documentary that's left oozing down the wall.

And just as everything turned for the worse after that party, so too did reality television embark irrevocably down the dark path after The Real World: Los Angeles. When you look at the strained semi-reality of Scott Baio is 46 and Pregnant or The Hills you are seeing the payoff, 15 years later, of what was started during the 1993 season of The Real World.

Here's what the show "pioneered" and why it still haunts us today:

1. It was the first season of the show with a "dressed set."

The previous season took place in a loft that was, save for size, no more or less different than any other shared space in New York. The second season, however, began the MTVization of the living space.

Though a relatively minor change, it was symbolic of the eventual disconnection from reality we were to see in this and other reality shows. (By the middle seasons of The Real World, for instance, the kids were living in houses that weren't just unrealistic for their income level, but unrealistic for human habitation. Seriously, Nunni Schoener would have trouble living in some of these places.)

[Where we see it now: Real World, Surreal Life, Flava of Love, Rock of Love]

2. It introduced the "confessional."

In fact, the word confessional -- as it pertains to the small sound-proof room that allowed the cast to comment on the day-to-day happenings of the show -- was coined by the members of this cast.

While certainly not the first time a subject of a documentary was allowed to comment on the events depicted, it was the first time that it happened in real-time. That is, at any time of the day or night, a cast member could enter into a special room and give his or her thoughts about what was being filmed.

The goal of a reality show should be to get the players to forget the cameras are on them. The confessional served as a constant reminder that they were being filmed, which, as Klosterman points out in his essay, eventually destroyed the reality genre. Like Anakin Skywalker killing the Sand People, this is where reality shows started on their long, slow descent towards the Dark Side.

[Where we see it now: Every Bleeping Show on the Planet]

3. It increased the episode count from 13 to 22.

While this wouldn't be a big deal for regular, network television (where most shows are ordered in batches of 22) the increased order was very significant for MTV, which, though successful, didn't exactly have Oprah money in 1993.

What the increased order represented was the thing that would eventually turn reality TV into basic-cable crack: the entertainment to investment ratio was many times higher than for any other kind of show. Animation, scripted drama and comedy, even game shows... all of them cost boatloads more than simply turning a video camera onto a bunch of frat-boy douchebags and sorority-girl sluts.

The cheapness of reality shows eventually went on to lower the overall quality of our viewing experience.

Expensive shows require development. You don't want to just throw a million-dollar-an-episode show on the air without any regard to character or plot (though one could argue that the producers of Galactica 1980 did just that). Of course not every scripted show is going to be good, but at least the producers try. There's too much money at stake not to.

Because of their cheapness, reality shows don't need to be good. You can throw ideas up as fast as you can think of them. A reality show can spring into existence as quickly as Kenneth's idea for Gold Case; a meeting one day, a full blown network commitment the next. How many quality shows are lost to the ether because a network executive wanted to try out the latest permutation of the dating-show genre?

[Where we see it now: Rock of Love 2, Flava of Love 3, I love Manhattan 2, the fact that as of season 20, there have been more than 450 episodes of The Real World.]

4. It used prejudice as a selling point.

It would be silly to argue that the Real World: Los Angeles introduced the concept of prejudice as entertainment (also, D.W. Griffith's estate or Nancy Grace might sue), but what was telling about the this season of The Real World was just how obvious the race/sex/gender-baiting was.

It was almost as an executive at MTV said, "Well, the racial strife in Real World: New York seemed to be really popular, how can we up the ante? I got it! Let's get a redneck-virgin-Republican-country-singer type and have him interact with <whispering> black people! And, not only that, let's get his family involved! Let's send a <whispering> black person, to his home in Kentucky to pick him up! That way we can get the racial response of his parents in the show too! It'll be hilarious! I mean, it'll be important."

Jon's hesitant reaction to <whispering> black people and sex and drugs and LA in general was so obviously forced and orchestrated that it resulted in not just one, but two, parodies: SNL's famous 1993 skit and Dave Chappelle's similar satire from 2001. The lemmings who were pushed off the cliff during the filming of White Wilderness had more choice in their actions.

Exposing prejudice is the best way to combat it. Exploiting prejudice, however, helps no one (except of course for the network and producers doing the exploitation). What The Real World: Los Angeles did (and what other reality shows were to imitate) was to take someone of a different race or religion or sexuality and reduce them to nothing more than a type. And, while types are easier to package into a half hour episode, they simplify the argument so much as to effectively eliminate it from the conversation.

[Where we see it today: Survivor, Wife Swap, The Real World]

5. It validated victimization.

Probably the most remembered event from the second season of The Real World was that the comedian, David, pulled a blanket off the semi-dressed AIDS Activist/Buddhist, Tami, resulting in him being banned from the house.

What I remember about this event was not the horror of it, but the fun of it. It looked, to me, like a bunch of people having a good time and playing around with each other. Tami was laughing while it was going on. This was not like a date-rapist claiming after the fact that "she wanted it"; we all watched what was going on and we all pretty much reached the same conclusion: she wanted it.

But later on in the episode, when Tami and the rest of the girls decided that what David did was wrong, MTV took her side. They banned David from the house for... uh... aggressive blanket-taking.

It was obvious why they did that: it made for great television. Here we are 15 years later and I'm pretty sure that a vast majority of you thought "blanket-incident" the second you saw Real World: Los Angeles mentioned in this article.

This decision, however, had far-reaching consequences. What future reality-show participants learned from it was that audiences will always side with the victims, regardless of how slight the offense. We now see the victimization histrionics turned up so loudly on every single reality show that it's near-impossible to find one without a cast member crying about some perceived dis. Television is running a victimization arms-race that makes me long for the days of the nuclear arms-race.

At least if the missiles launched all the cry-babies on TV would die, too.

[Where we see it today: like the confessional, every-freaking-where]

--

Whenever I try to find the origin of something, it's hard for me not to hear Scout in my ear scolding, that if I "...wanted to take a broad view of the thing, it really began with General Jackson." It's just one of the good pieces of advice in To Kill a Mockingbird: when you're dealing with "starting points", you start to slide down time's slippery slope. If I'm going to blame The Real World: Los Angeles for spawning Flava of Love, I might as well blame Martha Quinn for helping to spawn The Real World: Los Angeles. Or, hell, Martha Quinn's parents for spawning Martha Quinn. It starts to get ridiculous fairly quickly.

(Incidentally, here's another good piece of advice from To Kill a Mockingbird: never, ever bust up a chiffarobe strange to you. It only leads to trouble.)

There's a palpable difference, however, between the first and second season of The Real World. Let's see what happens was replaced with let's see what we can make happen. The latter has been reality TV's guiding philosophy ever since, and we've been the worser for it.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go find out who won Mud Bowl II on last week's Rock of Love II.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

14 Comments

Filter by:
Wayne

First off, take the "M" out of MTV since they NO LONGER PLAY VIDEOS. Even their sister stations have become shallow and don't do what they should - PLAY VIDEOS!

Now that I've gotten that off my chest, on to the Real World - I confess, I watched the first couple of seasons when the shows were new and exciting, but the later seasons basically "jumped the shark" with their obvious set ups, taking away the spontaniety of the earlier seasons. Curse MTV for losing focus and for jump starting the reality show frenzy!

February 26 2008 at 2:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TI3GIB

Great article, from both yourself and Chuck.

February 22 2008 at 3:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
backflip

Ah, I'm glad you cited Klosterman in your analysis (though arguing with the man is probably worse than anything you or I have ever done).

I commend you on a great piece of writing.

February 18 2008 at 11:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rollo

Let's not forget one important thing.

The people on this show are not allowed to watch TV!!!! WEIRD!

I always marveled how someone can claim to be watching "Reality TV" when the #1 pastime in the united states is not represented as being a part of "reality."

As Bart Simpson would say, "The Ironing Is Delicious"

February 18 2008 at 9:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Justin

Great read--but I pity you for wanting to be Chuck Klosterman. Stating the obvious in obnoxious prose isn't genius. Is Gen X that desperate for a voice to call their own? If so, don't do so behind Klosterman.

February 18 2008 at 7:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Joanna

I hung in as long as I could and stopped watching after Real World Hawaii. As a result, I stayed off the ride for all the other reality shows that came after that. I of course jumped back on when it became family focused (i.e. The Osbourne's, Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica, Meet The Barkers, Til Death Do Us Part: Carmen & Dave, Hogan Knows Best, Being Bobby Brown). Not sure how those affected society but it surely affected them! (all but the first one divorced).

February 18 2008 at 3:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Joanna's comment
Joey Geraci

Oh, and I am sure the "family-focused" (but not family friendly) reality shows were so much higher quality than the "single-focused" ones.

February 18 2008 at 5:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
slutty_whore

Maybe I missed the point of this article, but what is wrong with MTV marketing a popular commodity? I mean, had the original Real World tanked, don't you think the station would have returned to music videos? I don't see anything in your article about MTV's attempt at game shows, dating shows, or cartoons. Like any other network, they take their most popular commodity, make what they would deem to be improvements, market it, and run it into the ground. I hate to say it, Jay, but it's our fault as viewers that continue to watch this show.

And, by the way, the most memorable of RW2 was Tami getting her mouth wired shut as a way to lose weight!

February 18 2008 at 3:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
malren

EXCELLENT piece. Not only do I agree with every word, but I would take it even further: the victimization is at work in all aspects of life now. Everyone just cries victim when they don't get treated better than everyone else.

I think part of the reason - albeit not the whole reason - is that there are now two generations raised on this culture of MTV validating victimization as part of the culture, and they were raised by three generations already on the path to crying victim at every opportunity.

February 18 2008 at 2:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to malren's comment
Jay Black

Malren, I couldn't agree with you more. I think when they write the book on the late 90s and early 00s, the word "Victimization" will show up somewhere in the first chapter. As Artie Lange from Howard Stern might say, we're raised an entire generation of kids whose first response to any obstacle is to go "Waaaaaaaaaaaaah..."

February 19 2008 at 11:33 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jim

A great piece of writing, as usual, Jay. This is TV Squad at its best.

One question, though: Was Chappelle's parody really done in 2001? The one where the guy gets "shiv'ed" for talking about "YOU people?"

February 18 2008 at 1:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jim's comment
Jay Black

Thanks, Jim, for the nice comment -- your comments are always appreciated!

As for the Chappelle thing -- you're right, it wasn't 2001! It was 2003. "Mad Real World" was from the first season of Chappelle's Show (which, because I'm old, feels like it was a much longer time ago than it actually was).

It is interesting that Chappelle would do a parody of a show that aired ten years previously. According to wikipedia, Chappelle was actually friends with David (they're about the same age) and always felt that there was an over-the-top amount of race-baiting in the second season of The Real World. Mad Real World was his answer to that...

February 19 2008 at 11:31 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Emily

I'm probably the only person in the US who has never seen this show. I stopped watching MTV when they stopped showing videos (a couple of decades ago). From what you have written, I haven't missed anything.

February 18 2008 at 12:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Emily's comment
iamhoff

You are not alone. I have never watched any episodes of Real World, ever. Or, for that matter, Road Rules, Survivor, or Big Brother. Unfortunately, the writers' strike got my GF watching Rock of Love, Tila Tequila, Scott Baio, Celebrity Rehab, and My Fair Brady, so I've unfortunately lost my cheesy reality virginity. Interesting side note: VH1 followed MTV. After MTV had been playing music vids for a while, VH1 got into the act. Then came the MTV shows (TRL, Remote Control, etc.) that were still somewhat music-oriented. Then came the MTV reality shows that gave up the music aspect, with the exception of some soundtrack work. Then came the VH1 shows that still had some musical tie-ins (Pop Up Video, Behind the Music, etc.). Then came the VH1 reality shows (Rock of Love, Baio, Brady, Bonaduce, Celebrity Rehab, Flavor Flav, etc.). "The Day the Music Died." More true than you know.

February 18 2008 at 5:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners