popular video sites like hulu, zoogatv and tidaltv that offer programming from multiple content sources versus breing content-specific (from your own network) is simply just better.

try multiple professional content portals like www.hulu.com, www.zoogatv.com and www.tidaltv.com versus the wb's approach of being content specific.

hmmm, WB site will be content specific to their content versus on portals with multiple content partners. not sure that the content-specific will be as good as the multiple content partner approach. professional video sites like hulu, zoogatv and tidaltv are the best way to go with multiple content partners.

I hope Studio 60 is moved from Hulu, but they probably have an agreement for a length of time.

I'm so glad that the writers didn't strike for nothing.

I mean with all those on-demand online video websites popping up like mad you really have to wonder how much of a "nothing" these sites are generating in ad revenues. And how much of a letdown the final agreement was. I say it wasn't one and the strike was justified.

There is a problem with that picture, he O.C. was FOX, not WB

Except that Fox produced Buffy, not Warner Bros., so Buffy would be on Hulu (and is), as Fox/Universal engineered that service. Warner Bros. Television produced Gilmore Girls for what was then the WB network (now known as the CW, in conjunction with CBS), and while a few of their (Warner Bros. Television) shows are on Hulu (mostly their F/X original series, again, because of the Fox connection), it will most likely be other Warner Bros. television properties that appear on the new portal, not shows from the late WB network.