Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

Is ESPN teaming up with The NFL Network?

by Allison Waldman, posted Jun 22nd 2008 10:33AM
NFL Network logoIf you're a pro football fan and you don't get the NFL Network, chances are you know about the stalemate between the NFL Network and cable operators, like Time Warner. Because of their inability to strike a compromise, eight NFL games last season which The NFL Network broadcast, were unavailable to many cable customers, causing much hue and cry.

Well, it looks like there may be a light at the end of the tunnel. ESPN is talking with The NFL Network about a broadcasting partnership, that according to The Associated Press. If a deal is done, NFL Network games in 2008 could be seen by just about everyone, not just those of us who are satellite subscribers.

The main bone of contention between The NFL Network and cable operators is money. The NFL wants their network to be carried on basic cable, like ESPN and all the other ESPNs are carried. If you get cable, you know that you're not paying extra for ESPN. However, when you get something called the Sports Package/Tier, you'll pay an extra $10 to get things like Fox Sports Net. Plans vary in different places, but that's the idea. Cable operators want The NFL Network to be on a Sports Tier; the NFL wants to be included with basic cable.

Because of this squabble, The NFL Network games have been blacked out for cable subscribers. Now, things could be changing. The NFL Net's talks with ESPN are headed up by Steven Bornstein, who used to be president of the ABC network and the chairman of ESPN. Dennis Johnson, spokesman for The NFL Network wouldn't talk specifics, but confirmed that the company was "in talks with ESPN and our other broadcast partners all the time on a wide range of issues."

As a sports fan, I really hope ESPN and the NFL can work something out. Too many pro football fans have been kicked around like footballs in the tug-of-war between billionaires. We don't care what they do, just give us the damn games on TV!

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

7 Comments

Filter by:
starky22

NFL Network charges the cable/satelline companies an inflated price to broadcast programming they already own. Most cable networks have to go out and purchase the programming they air on cable or satellite, and charge the cable companies a fee sufficient to cover their costs. If the cable or satellinte companies choose to place certain networks into a "package" to cover a network's inflated rates, so be it. It's the cost of doing business. Deal with it.

June 23 2008 at 9:25 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
John Howard

I have cable and I saw all eight NFL Network games last year. It cost me less than $15 for the three months I had the package which included the NFL Network, which is well worth it. I can understand the Time Warner customers complaining, if it actually isn't available to them at all. But with Comcast at least, it's available at a reasonable price, so there's no reason for any of their customers to whine.

June 23 2008 at 8:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
YouFaceTheTick

I hope it doesn't happen. ESPN sucks for football coverage. They hire a bunch of no-talent ass-clowns like Emmitt, Joe Theismann and Irvin.

June 23 2008 at 1:17 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Ryan

Uh, the NFL Network's games haven't been blocked out to all cable subscribers. On many systems, you just have to subscribe to the sports tier.

I don't particularly care for the NFL Network and the league's tactics (oh, those sob stories from Joe's Diner). I would prefer it to remain on the sports tier. There are too many single-sports networks that all should be on the sports tiers -- Golf, Tennis, GOL, Speed, NBA, NHL and MLB. Why should the NFL be any different?

True, the NFL is more popular than those other sports. Perhaps, but the idea of a year-round network for a single sport whose season runs only half a year seems like a waste of my money if it were put on the basic tier.

Worse, I can only think of perhaps eight days a year when I might be remotely interested in watching this network. That, of course, would be when they're broadcasting a game. For the remaining 98 percent of the year, I'd rather save my pennies for more worthwhile entertainment options.

June 22 2008 at 2:58 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Ryan's comment
YouFaceTheTick

On DTV and Cox cable it's part of the generic cable package. We saw every NFLN game and so did my sister (on Cox Cable). It's the only channel we'll watch for NFL news as ESPN provides retard-level coverage.

June 23 2008 at 1:18 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Jake

Tell you what, if you have the chance to get Satallite, even if its not HD, get it! DirecTV is so much better in terms of flexible packages and service. You can go on the internet and add or drop a package with the click of a button. They also carry NFL Network as part of their basic package and they are the only carrier to offer the NFL Sunday ticket. I have NFLN, ESPN Classic, VS, and ESPN News on my basic package. I get Fox Sports Net and ESPN U when I add the sports package(plus a bunch more I never tune to).

As for ESPN teaming up with NFL, I am not for that because I am not for anything that increases ESPN's influence and power. Part of the reason NFL network is so great is because it is everything ESPN is not. I am surprised the NFL is this weak. If I were them I'd just start pulling the market team's games and force the cable companies to add them to basic.

June 22 2008 at 1:04 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Diego M

That's a smart move. a lot of people want the NFL to be in basic, i pay 5 bucks extra for it and the NFLN is the only chanel worth paying for do i really wanna get the golf channel? no but that's part of the sports tier.

This could get the NFLN's viewershi through the roof. satelite does have it on the expanded package. Comcast is suckin it hard though.

LETS GO RAIDERS!

June 22 2008 at 11:52 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners