Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

McKellan and Caviezel captured for AMC's remake of The Prisoner

by Jason Hughes, posted Jun 30th 2008 9:20PM
Jim Caviezel in I don't know how they keep doing it; AMC that is. Not only have they brought us stellar series (Mad Men) after stellar series (Breaking Bad), but now they've managed to snag two big-time Hollywood names to join the cast of their remake of one of the smartest shows in television history. What started as rumor, that even we at TV Squad had a hard time believing, is now fact. Both Jim Caviezel and Ian McKellan have been cast in AMC's remake of The Prisoner. Caviezel is set to fill Patrick McGoohan's shoes as the titular "Number Six," while McKellan will step into the role of "Number Two."

AMC's The Prisoner is scheduled to be a six-part mini-series. It hasn't been made clear if those six parts are one hour, two or a combination of both, but either way the original wrapped up in 17 so there's no reason to think we can't get a satisfying tale in six installments. With casting of the two principals announced, it's actually safe to say now that this thing might really get made. AMC is cruising right along with their original programming, and after forty years, I think we're due a re-imagining of this classic series. And unlike the disastrous The Andromeda Strain at A&E, I have faith that AMC won't let me down ... don't let me down, AMC!

As a huge fan of The Prisoner and honestly couldn't think of a better time culturally for a remake. The first series was very much a response to the paranoia of the Cold War and mistrust among Eastern and Western bloc countries. Luckily, so to speak, we're in just such an era of mistrust and paranoia now with the ongoing "War on Terrorism." With Homeland Security and the other activities we've taken to doing in this country, it's not too unreasonable to think that a government agent who abruptly resigns with no explanation might be held and interrogated to find out why he quit. And while I can't speak for the UK, and am not even sure if this new series will be set there as the original was, I'd imagine the tensions and sentiments would be at least similar.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

4 Comments

Filter by:
StillBash

Lovely how when you put it into some fancy words you can point out the shortest series of brilliant shows. Two. And that you can even claim they've done it "one after the other". Brilliant. You could even say they have done it "time and again". Or that they have a "tag team" of "brilliant" series. They could do a "double header" with their "two main attractions" on the network that has "proved yet again" that they can "defend the title".

Seesh. They did two good series in one year and suddenly everything they lay their hands on turns into gold or what?

I love "Mad Man" and I definitely like "Breaking Bad" but seriously the one has had 13 episodes and the other 7. Together they form not even a full one season run on any other network show. Get yourself together man, you sound like a teenage fangirl :-)

July 01 2008 at 9:10 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to StillBash's comment
StillBash

Men. Plural.

Dammit I hate it that you can't edit your posts.

July 01 2008 at 10:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
John

mcgoohan's original plan for the series was for just 7 episodes; the outline was expanded in order to meet the broadcasters' desires, so a seven-part remake seems fitting

June 30 2008 at 9:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Toby OB

I'm hoping this is still in the planning stages so that McKellan is just one of the actors hired to play Number Two. I always liked that as each one failed to break Number Six, they were replaced. This also helped to keep Number Six off-balance and unable to get a fix on his captor.

Oh well. We'll see.....

June 30 2008 at 9:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners