Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Hell's Kitchen: Day 14

by Bob Sassone, posted Jul 1st 2008 11:34PM

hells kitchen

(S04E14) "My goal tonight is to make Chef Ramsay second guess the fact that he got rid of me." - Jen

Oh Jen, just when we had started to forget you, you come back with the nasty attitude and the chip on your shoulder. Like Mary Tyler Moore, you can turn the world on with your smile.

This is part one of the finale, where final contestants Petrozza and Christina design their restaurants and have to complete a service with some of the eliminated contestants. The returning players are Jen, Louross, Bobby, Corey, Matt, and Ben. Not sure why these contestants are the ones who return, other than they're the most controversial. They're not all the most recent rejects, because Roseann would be in the mix if that was the case and not Ben.

I have mixed feelings about these contestants coming back, which I'll explain after the jump.

I really like it when Hell's Kitchen gets down to the nitty gritty of two contestants. Finally, the backstabbing and soap opera stuff is gone and we can focus on the two last chefs and their plans for their own restaurants, and there's just a sense that there's more breathing room without all of the other players getting in the way. Aside from some comments by Christina about Petrozza having to push his fireplace wall into her space a little bit and her hatred of the stripes that the designer put on her walls (even though she said she liked the stripes and picked them herself), this episode didn't have any of the nastiness of the other episodes. But that will change next week when the service begins and we have to deal with Jen's attitude, conflicting personalities, and whatever Matt might do. I kinda wish they didn't bring back any of the other contestants and just have the final two go up against each other, somehow, some way.

Still not sure why Whoopi Goldberg showed up for 12 seconds and then vanished forever (she didn't even have a hand in who won the challenge). Unless she comes back for the finale next week, it was like trying to find Alfred Hitchcock's cameo in one of his movies. I also don't get Petrozza's near-orgasmic "Oh my Gahd...Oh my Gahd...Oh my Gahd..." when Whoopi appeared.

Petrozza wins the challenge, by the way, chosen by the five executive chefs from his other restaurants. It comes down to the final chef (of course it does), but in the end Petrozza's filet mignon with onions and risotto is chosen over Christina's New York strip steak with succotash and potatoes.

So the finale next week will have the players helping Petrozza and Christina win, but before that, a few observations.

- I think Ramsay's "I'm wondering if I have the right finalists" trick is manipulative. Not just to Petrozza and Christina but to the audience as well. They pushed it in the coming attractions last week, and for a split second I agreed with Christina when she said she thought they were going to bring back another contestant to compete again.

- The 10 minute season recap at the start is so rapid-fire that I doubt anyone who missed an episode or two would know what the heck happened. And it just proves that the BS stuff like the hot tub and shopping trips are a really boring part of the show. Though it was fantastic to relive Petrozza's "Hen in a Pumpkin" signature dish from the first episode. Good to see his signature dish changed so drastically in this ep.

- What's up with the big spectacle in Times Square? You could see hundreds of New Yorkers watching Ramsay, Petrozza, and Christina film the scene in the middle of Times Square, then a giant congrats to the two contestants was flashed on the big screen (though it's hard to say if that was superimposed later). How did this bit of information about who these contestants were - at least maybe some pics - get out weeks ago? Or did it and I just haven't heard about it?

- All of the flowers that Petrozza wants in his restaurant? That really worries me.

Who will win Hell's Kitchen?
Petrozza226 (56.5%)
Christina174 (43.5%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

19 Comments

Filter by:
ORKMommy

"The 10 minute season recap at the start is so rapid-fire that I doubt anyone who missed an episode or two would know what the heck happened."

They wouldn't know much more by reading these recaps all season either!

July 03 2008 at 2:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jim Kosmicki

I am guessing that it's like most of the contest shows. Top Chef, for example, is between 4 and 6 weeks, but it's intensive -- the contestants are totally isolated from anything but each other. They aren't allowed newspapers, TV, internet, etc. Almost every interview with contestants from shows like this indicate that they are in a cocoon where they don't really get a sense of the outside world or normal time-flow -- it's simply on to the next task.

Hell's Kitchen is a bit different in that the prizes often involve going into the outside world, but always in a very guided, controlled fashion. They don't get to phone their family or cruise the internet for an hour or so. When you are that isolated, finally seeing your family would be pretty awesome. What always annoys me about them being surprised is that they have to have watched the show before -- they knew it was coming at that point. But again, if you're just focused on surviving and making it to the next task, you might not be thinking critically or even rationally about what you "know" about the show.

What my family has always wondered is if the diners pay for their meal. If I sat there for three hours and never got my meal, I'd be upset. But if I understood that it was part of a competition show, and the food was free, that would alleviate a lot of the annoyance factor. it would also make many of the angry diner encounters more staged for effect -- a common complaint about this show, after all.

July 03 2008 at 2:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
william hunt

Is it just me or does it make anyone else irratated when they do the episode of family members being brought in and the contestants act as though they have not seen them in months?? Does anyone know how long a whole season of taping is???

July 03 2008 at 12:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
GL

@Riley Freeman: do you have some inside dope on what a great designer Bobby is?

@Laura: I don't skip the epsidoes, but sometimes I find that having turned the channel during a commercial, I forget to turn HK back on. I never feel like I missed anything.

July 02 2008 at 4:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jessica

I can't believe Jen is back! She looks like a troll and her outfit totally punctuated my observation. Her slurred words, barely open eyes, and her overall horrendous use of the English language makes me dislike her even more. Gees, couldn't they find a different "bad guy" to bring in to the mix of chefs? She is a saboteur. She doesn't even create havoc in an enjoyable way. She is straight up mean and that isn't fun to watch.

I am not sure who I want to win though I am leaning toward Petrozza because the guy loves flowers. He also seemed drunk with glee while designing his side of Hell's Kitchen. Or maybe he was just drunk?! Hmmmmm

July 02 2008 at 2:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
puffin

Just a bit of Triva I suppose. The first 2 executive chefs that were judges in the challenge were the two Sous-Chefs from the first Hells Kitchen in the UK. They had more a part in that show then the sous-chefs in current version have.

July 02 2008 at 12:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
4ham

Maybe Petrozza is just a big Whoopi fan. Also the voting on the challenge totally sucked. I'm not saying Christina should have won, but the way it was going down, Petrozza should have won when the third chef voted, of course GR was laying heavily into him to stretch it out.

July 02 2008 at 12:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to 4ham's comment
Ray

Of course the challenge voting was staged - they had to drag it out and put in some suspense. If they really wanted, they could have had secret ballots and then read them out instead of each judge hearing what each other had voted. This always introduces bias in the way the next person votes. This whole series is a sham and needs to be watched with a grain salt - err, maybe a dash of salt.

July 02 2008 at 2:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Laura

For the last few weeks I've been reading the review here and deleting the show from my dvr unwatched. I'm just interested enough to want to know who wins. However, I couldn't care less to actually watch what happens. All of the bad, bad, bad contestants turned me off.

The reviews have satisfied my interest without having to subject myself to the inanities of the players.

July 02 2008 at 12:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Riley Freeman

Bobby should be in the Final he was in the bottom 2 once. Still a bad decision. Christina is a terrible designer with her stripes and Petrozza has no clue what to do with design and outfits. I think this will be the worst ending to Hell's Kitchen where the winner wasnt really the best.

Do over I say

July 02 2008 at 10:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ricky19

matt and jen were wearing black because that was the color of their jacket when they left the show. just a thought tho.

July 02 2008 at 9:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners