Powered by i.TV
February 10, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Hell's Kitchen: Day 15 (season finale)

by Bob Sassone, posted Jul 8th 2008 11:21PM

HK finale
(S04E15)

Even if this was the first episode of Hell's Kitchen that a viewer had seen this season, they would have understood what the players were like and what the game was about just by watching this season finale. Jen was bitchy and unreasonable, Matt was bat-shit crazy, Louross was hyperactive, Ramsay swore a lot, food got sent back, some food went out raw. It was like a wrap-up of the season while still being a new episode.

But who won in the end, Petrozza or Christina? The answer after the jump.

It's hysterical (and I mean that in a sad way) that Jen is still complaining that Chef Ramsay made a mistake in not picking her for the final two because she's (in her words) is the most talented chef by far. But when it came down to either Matt or Jen, who would you pick? I'd pick Jen too, because Matt is waaaaaaaay too unpredictable.

I often wonder about bringing back the losing contestants to help the two finalists. Not that they would purposely sabotage the team, but what is really in it for them except "pride?" They certainly don't love the other contestants enough (well, maybe they like Petrozza), and I can see them just not giving 100%.

I thought that both Petrozza (by the way, did you know that's his last name? His full name is Louis Petrozza) and Christina do well tonight. They deal with prickly personalities like Jen and Matt (luckily, both Louross and Ben are fine during the dinner service), they deal with food being sent back (what the hell is wrong with Matt and the monkfish? - though that would be an excellent name for a band.), and they run the pass well, being assertive yet helpful.

So it's really close, but it's Christina's magical door that opens at the end into a roomful of family and friends and cameras and balloons and confetti. As she makes her way down the stairs, you could see Ramsay hugging Petrozza in the background, because he knows how hard he worked, and I thought that was a nice thing to do. Petrozza is shaking uncontrollably and needs help getting down the stairs. Ramsay toasts Christina and he and the sous chefs spray champagne over everyone. Matt kicks a child in the throat, and Jen walks around asking "Did I win? Did I win?"

While I would have liked to have seen Petrozza win, for being 100% likable and a good chef, Christina's win doesn't bother me at all. She was clever, won a lot of challenges, and clearly grew over the season. I can see her being a top-notch chef as she gets older and wiser.

Chef Ramsay says that she will be the Executive Chef at the new London West Hollywood, which opened at the end of May. But that's actually not what happened. Christina was named Senior Sous Chef at the restaurant, but gets the same $250,000 prize.

Did the right person win tonight?
Yes, Christina deserved it.134 (23.8%)
No, Petrozza should have won.246 (43.8%)
Honestly? They both deserved it.182 (32.4%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

15 Comments

Filter by:
Chris Mollo

Wow! what was Ramsay thinking? Petrozza won that season hands down! He blew Christina away at the pass (despite several sabotage attempts by the troll Jen), his food was beter, and he has a heart of gold and knows how to lead people?

Gordon, what the hell were you thinking man?

Also, I have to say that the competition on Hell's Kitchen is getting pretty lame.

I mean, come on, a bunch of immature, backstabbing babies who really don't have much measurable talent to begin with.

I have been a chef for 21 years, and let me tell you people, the Hell's Kitchen menu is very BASIC and EASY.

I have to say that even the worst Top Chef contestant would mop the floor with a Hell's Kitchen finalist.

February 19 2011 at 5:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
roger

Keep in mind that even though it "looks" like Petrozza did this better or that better, it really is the job of the editors to make the show entertaining. "Reality" television is anything but that.

Recall the uproar in Top Chef this season when Dale left. Colicchio felt a need to write on his blog about the outrage, even noting that he was surprised at the results after seeing the final cut.

For all we know, Christina kicked Petrozza's ass but they just highlighted a couple of the foul ups to make things interesting.

That being said, given what I was fed by Fox, I am happy with either Christina or Petrozza as a winner. Christina did seem to grow a lot during the show. A part of me feels that while he won't get the $250K salary, Ramsey may have something lined up for Petrozza somewhere else.

July 09 2008 at 5:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mj green

I am very happy Christina won. She was very clever, and worked well with her team. I personally liked her menu over P's. I liked them both, but she had the edge. Jen is still such a horror! To ask Ramsey for a recommendation? The nerve! Bet she didn't get one. And I must say I was proud of Louross. He became such a good team player, and was all gung ho, and willing to do the job. Yeah!!!! Can't wait for next season!! Please, no monkfish.

July 09 2008 at 4:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
GL

I can't complain about the outcome. Matt and Jen were serious tools though. The monkfish fiasco and the onion ring incident were tragicomedy.

July 09 2008 at 3:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mitch

Fairly certain that there was some compensation involved for the 6 losing contestants that were brought back. There would be zero motivation otherwise. You think Jen would want to lift a finger to help ANYONE after she was there unless cash was involved?

Maybe, if you were on the winning (Christina's) team, you got $10,000 each, and losing team got $2K each, or something. I have a hard time believing otherwise.

July 09 2008 at 2:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
kevjohn

I thought all along (well, ever since the field got whittled down to the last 6 or so) that L. Petrozza should win. The final service was very close though. Both the finalists finally showed some signs of leadership while running their teams, though it seemed to take some prodding from Ramsay to get them to put their boots in the asses of their weaker chefs.

I still think L-Pet should have won, but I can see Ramsay's point about selecting a younger person with talent and potential who can still be molded into what he's looking for. I didn't think that's what this competition was about though. Louie P. should have won.

July 09 2008 at 10:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom

Allison,

I think you're pretty much on the mark to a degree -- I think Ramsey takes the UK editions of his shows very seriously. However, I'd be more inclined to point a finger at Fox, notorious for sensation over substance.

I've never watched the American version of Kitchen nightmares, but I hear that it focuses mostly on the melodrama, fighting and other silliness rather than the food and the resturaunt that Ramsey is there to save.

Alternatively, my wife and I record and watch almost every edition of Nightmares off of BBC America. In every episode, Ramsey seems to actually give a damn about the people and the resturaunt, and there's alot of focus on the food.

Granted, I'm sure Fox is handing him a chunky paycheck and so he's more than happy to give them what they ask for.

July 09 2008 at 9:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Tom's comment
sarah

well, Ramsey is not the person responsible for how the show is produced or editted. im pretty sure that he gives a damn, but Fox being Fox edits the show to focus more on the drama. not to mention, USA actually values that crap. drama and sex sells, unfortunately.

July 09 2008 at 12:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
rick cokely

I think that if the prize were for another restaurant and not Ramsey's own, he would have chosen Petrozza. Honestly, it makes sense to take the young (and cute) one so you can mold them into what you want them to be.

July 09 2008 at 9:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sebastian Cabet

Clearly Ramsay got it right this time.

Petrozza is a complete SLOB. Disorganized and lacking in self confidence (remember the first episode?).

Christina will become a *star* and it makes total sense that Ramsay wants to develop her. But it is very misleading to advertise that the winner is going to become executive chef.

Frankly Christina is not ready for that position--but neither was anyone else on that show. What a joke most of those people were--clearly a show built for tv ratings.

July 09 2008 at 3:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Marty

Wow. Jen has to be the most miserable excuse for a human being that has ever been on reality TV. I've never seen someone so arrogant, so it's-never-my-fault in all my TV watching. And Matt has to be the dumbest.

The right person won, though I liked Petrozza too.

July 09 2008 at 12:22 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Marty's comment
rick cokely

Jen was a mess, but I am pretty sure that there are worse reality "stars" out there. Puck comes to mind, as does most of the cast of Flavor of Love.

July 09 2008 at 9:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners