Powered by i.TV
February 11, 2012
 
CONNECT    

AFTRA ratifies a new studio contract, despite complaints from the Screen Actors Guild

by Richard Keller, posted Jul 9th 2008 12:25PM

AFTRA has ratified a new studio documentAnd now, another installment of 'David vs. Goliath'. In this case, David is The American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), while the role of Goliath is portrayed by the Screen Actors Guild (SAG). For months, both unions have been negotiating with the studios for higher salaries for their lower-paid actors as well as more profits from DVD and new media sales. AFTRA, the smaller of the two actor unions, has been fairly quiet concerning these negotiations. SAG, on the other hand, has been quite boisterous concerning the poor negotiating tactics of the studios.

With the amount of muscle SAG has one would think they would have been able to get the better deal of the two unions. Yet, as in David's battle against Goliath, it looks like the little person got the better of the bigger one. On Tuesday, the 70,000 members of AFTRA ratified a new prime-time TV contract. According to AFTRA President Roberta Reardon, the new contract "contains substantial gains for every category of performer in both traditional and new media." This, despite a campaign by SAG members to persuade those who are members of both unions to vote "no" on the contract.

What consequences does this have for SAG? First, it undermines their efforts to obtain a richer deal from the studios. Second, it makes the possibility of an actors strike less likely since there's a chance that many dual-union actors would stay on the job as AFTRA performers. The possibility of a strike was not as great anyway since many actors were fatigued from dealing with this past winter's writers strike.

Still, SAG is not giving up in making its point for a better contract. SAG president Alan Rosenberg issued a statement calling AFTRA's new contract as "inadequate" and stating that he would vow to "continue to address the issues of importance to actors that AFTRA left on the table." That seems a bit high-handed to me and smacks as someone who is feeling the pressure to settle the contract disputes one way or another.

Meanwhile, AFTRA executives have called for a summit of actors and union leaders to discuss ways to bolster unity between unions. Also on the table is the possibility to merge the two unions into one. With AFTRA now in agreement with the studios and SAG still putting on a stubborn persona, I wonder if AFTRA would absorb SAG rather than vice-versa.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

5 Comments

Filter by:
RI_red

As a member of both unions, having talked to a lot fo other dual members, the AFTRA contract is more than fair. It makes huge strides in New Media among other things and brings the pay rates of AFTRA actors beyond where SAG is. It's important to remember that these contracts only last 3 years. If it doesn't work out for whatever reason we can always renegotiate then. As far as SAG goes it seems like they are trying to undermine the hard work that the AFTRA negotiating board did. Their propaganda is ridiculous. This all boils down to Hollywood (SAG) trying to keep the largest slice of the pie to themselves. The rest of the SAG branches, many of whom share offices and personel with AFTRA, were mostly in favor of the AFTRA contract.

July 09 2008 at 1:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to RI_red's comment
Jeff N.

Me, do you think if SAG asked for a strike that they could get 75% of the Union to authorize one?

July 09 2008 at 5:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jeff N.

A strike would be disastrous. But now that AFTRA has gotten a deal done and ratified it, I am not sure SAG could get 75% of it's members to vote for a strike. Another strike would hurt the industry in so many ways I hope the chances are now slim. I could see the result of a prolonged actors strike having less scripted shows on TV which would cost actors jobs. Guess we shall see what happens in the next month.

July 09 2008 at 12:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Richard Keller

Yes, made the change. That's probably another reason why the two unions should merge.

July 09 2008 at 12:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Veronica

I think you meant 'SAG president Alan Rosenberg'

July 09 2008 at 12:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners