I totally agree with what I have read about TV Land so far. I, like many other viewers, don't understand why a "classic television station" (As they called themselves in the beginning) would want to change.
As one other person mentioned they are watching TV Land less and less, well, so am I. I am so disappointed in TV Land.
I used to put Nick at Nite and TV Land on for my grandchildren to watch. And guess what, they are 10, 6, and almost 2. They enjoyed it !!
Maybe the programs are sugar coated, but don't you think we all get enough reality in our every day lives?
I know I sure do!!
I'm sorry TV Land to see you change so much. I won't be watching any more. I have already begun to look for alternate programming.
Hey, did anyone know that WGN network runs classic programming on Sunday Nights? They have The Honeymooners, Newhart, WKRP in Cincinnati, and many more. And ION network is running Quantum Leap along with some other very interesting programs.
I'm afraid TV Land has lost a viewer, but I wonder if they even care.

I'm 54 yo, and have watched Nick at Nite and TV Land for many years. I watched them over any other channels, because I always like the programs they showed as well as it seemed the content was much better. Sure maybe the shows were vanilla and everything was sugar coated; always a happy ending. Maybe the shows were old and silly and not reality (at leaste in todays world), but it was refreshing and relaxing. Not like the shows of today, sex, profanity, killings, using drugs, disrespect ,etc., heck, I had enough of that in real life being a cop for 26 years. Why would I want to watch it on television too. I don't like the reality shows, or someones 10 or 20 year reunion (which was so fake) and I have always liked George Foreman but I hated his show (why would anyone air their family issues, which again was fake). TV Land will do anything for the money and now want a younger audience....so be it. I'm wathing TV Land less and less because of the changes. Now I hope their days are numbered since they couldn't be loyal to those who were loyal to them all these years. And what I really think of the gurus who made this decision I can't put in print.

I think TV Land should stick to what they have shown for
years:classic TV, that goes from the earliest days of TV,
in the 50's to the most recent of times. On one hand it's
OK for Friends to be part of that mix, but on the other
hand, shows like Extreme Makeover and Scrubs, those
are shows that are still on the air! They are cheapening
their product in selling out to the damn reality genre, but
I guess that it is just a sign of the times
.

Not everyone gets AmericanLifeTV though, it's in about 20 million homes. We were going to get it on our cable system, but it got pushed aside in one of those annoying fights with public access channels (which most of the time shows that annoying Free Speech channel with shows made for $3.50).

I'm so sick of Viacom and their networks which don't seem to care about anything about ratings. I loved TV Land when it started, and now it's going down the tubes with this stupid obsession with getting older women to watch TV with modeling shows and "High School Reunion", a show no one was asking to come back.

How about American Life TV? They show a bunch of old shows.

Just one more reason to get rid of cable. Not all young people want to watch "reality" shows or junk like Friends. I love the comedies of the 70s and 80s when I was a toddler/grade schooler, because THEY ARE ACTUALLY FUNNY, unlike the stuff they air today. It's a good thing some of the classics have been released on DVD or else I'd have absolutely nothing to watch.

Wouldn't a retro television network inherently skew to an older demographic?

That's the reason why you watch TV Land in the first place: Oldies.

Who needs more "original programming"? Isn't that what NBC, CBS, ABC, et al supposed to do?

I'm terribly disappointed, but I haven't watched TV Land in ages because of all their "young" content. I'm not 55. I won't be 55 for another 27 years. It seems like I should be in the prime demographic. Anyway, I loved watching tv shows from before I was born. I loved the simpler storylines, and honestly the history that came along with them. Again, it's disappointing, but I've already stopped watching both TV Land and Nick at Nite because they aren't any good any more.

...and how about Tech TV? The last time I bothered even checking the listings Leo and the guys were gone and they were showing "The Man Show".

I used to watch TV Land all the time because I could see shows that weren't (at the time) avaialble to see in any other format. I'm sure the DVD landscape has changed TV Land, but there is still a wealth of programming out there not available on DVD or other formats. I used to stay up late on Friday nights and watch the old CBN network (yes, Christian Broadcasting!) because they would run THE JACK BENNY PROGRAM, THE BURNS & ALLEN SHOW, MY LITTLE MARGIE, BACHELOR FATHER, and THE LIFE OF RILEY. I'd never seen those shows before and I loved them - and I was 20 at the time - and TV Land, to the best of my knowledge, has never shown any of these series except for maybe Jack Benny. They've run I LOVE LUCY and THE LUCY SHOW, but what about HERE'S LUCY? The people running TV Land let it get stagnant by showing the same shows over and over again, and then acquiring shows readily available in syndication. There are a ton of shows I'd program the channel with to make it a destination for baby boomers and their kids to introduce them to what TV used to be like. As it stands, TV Land has lost a viewer...but at 46 I'm probably not the demographic they're looking for anymore. Farewell, Goodbye and Amen, TV Land.