Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Bones: Yanks in the UK (seson premiere)

by Richard Keller, posted Sep 3rd 2008 10:08PM

The Squints and Doctor Sweets

(S04E01) Hullo Guv! Welcome to the fourth series premiere of Bones. It has been a summer of anger and anticipation for most fans of the show. Anger, as many felt creator Hart Hanson bollixed the whole thing up by making Zack Addy a bit potty. Anticipation, because those same fans are curious to see how Hanson and his writers will fill the gap and how the rest of the blokes at the Jeffersonian will adjust. And, of course, there's also the unanswered question as to the state of Bones and Booth's relationship: will they shag or not this season?

None of those questions were answered in this two-hour series premiere, althouth Zack's fate was briefly mentioned. What we did get was a trip to Londontown by Temperance and Seeley (hence, the British slang), and some significant relationship changes amongst the Squints. So, grab a pint, some fish n' chips, and your favorite duck, and let's begin.

Premiering a new season with a two-hour episode is always a gamble in television. It either runs the risk of filling the episode with too much information for the viewer to take in, too little information to keep the viewer interested, or is uneven in its presentation. The season premiere of Bones fell under the title of uneven, at least with the London story line. While the second hour of the premiere felt more like a regular episode, the first hour felt a tad uncomfortable.

That could be due to Booth's portrayal during those first 60 minutes. We know that Seeley is a pretty bright person (that's why he's a Special FBI Agent and not just a FBI Agent), but in the the first segment of the show he looked pretty dim. Understandably it could have been the adjustment of being away from his home base and feeling both unwelcomed by some and unwanted by others. Without a gun, the resources of his agency behind him, and no good coffee, Booth probably felt a bit impotent...in the figurative sense.

It doesn't mean that his awkwardness didn't give the viewer some interesting moments. His tiny breakdown in the middle of a London traffic roundabout was one good example of how his uneasiness worked to the viewers' favor. Sure, stereotypical American driving on the wrong side of the road is always amusing. It was just the way that Booth handled it that made it funnier. That big, strapping guy (at least that's what the women say about him) in that tiny little car, screaming at the top of his lungs about the deficiencies of England. It's probably something that everyone who has been to another country has thought of doing one time or another.

Stepping away from the episode review and into the nuts and bolts of filming this episode, here's an interesting tidbit about the traffic roundabout scene. According to both Hart Hanson and David Boreanaz, London officials only gave them 16 seconds to film. During that time, city police officers would hold back normal traffic. David got the scene in one take, including the rant (minus what you hear over the phone when Cam is talking with Bones) and just made it back onto the street before the normal flow of traffic resumed. From what Boreanaz mentioned in some the interview clips provided in the preview DVD, the only person who got upset was one angry cab driver who happened to get too close to David's car.

Back to the review. Perhaps the other reason that the first hour of the premiere felt off was the case Bones and Booth were involved with. Frankly, it wasn't that interesting. So it involved an American who was a huge entrepreneur in England. We've seen that all before. That, and the oh-so-regal royal family that tries to hide their dirty laundry behind their titles. The only good thing about it was Booth's no-nonsense approach to interviewing the family and getting them to spill the beans. Blue blood or not, Seeley doesn't stop at anything to get the truth out.

The second hour of the premiere was much better as Bones and Booth became more involved with the case. Perhaps the interest was there because of the death of a character we were just introduced to an hour before. Dr. Ian Wexler was a charming, intelligent professor of anthropology. He was also a horndog. Throughout the first hour he continually tried to add Temperance as another notch on his belt which, if he really knew Brennan, he wouldn't have tried in the first place. He was also a tad bit pompous and looked down on Booth as just another American "cowboy". This probably placed him down a step on the likable chart.

When he was found dead it wasn't a total loss (although, it would have been interesting to see him in a British version of Bones). Still, it did add additional drama to the case. It also gave a more human face to Inspector Cate Pritchard -- Booth's counterpart in England. During the first hour, Pritchard showed a good deal of cooperation with their American partners in trying to solve the murder of the expatriate daughter of a real estate mogul. Once Wexler was killed that all changed. Being close to Ian, and I mean close, she doled out her help in smaller portions.As the investigation progressed she realized that holding information back would not solve the case any quicker. By the end of the episode there was a new found respect on both sides.

One more item on the London scenes before we move on. One of the other reasons this episode of Bones felt uneven was the filming style. We are all used to the look of the show, and it becomes a comforting blanket when we tune in each week. The way that the scenes in London were filmed reminded me of exterior shots that we see in shows like Torchwood and Doctor Who. It's hard to put a finger on what is different, but it seemed a bit lighter everywhere. Perhaps it's the style of film or editing format they use across the pond, but it took some time getting used to.

(An update on the filming style: it seems that the different look only appeared on the preview DVD I received. When I saw the episode again over the air the style looked the same as it did any other week. Just goes to show you that the 'Rough Draft' warning they give on these preview DVDs should be taken seriously.)

Enough of London. Time to turn our attention back to the Squints of the Jeffersonian and, perhaps, the more interesting storyline of the episode. First, Clark Edison was back in Zack's position. Unfortunately, it was only for a short time. Hart Hanson has mentioned that Bones and the team would have a series of assistants this season in Addy's slot. That's too bad, since Clark was interesting and presented a stable front in the soap opera that is the Squints.

Which is something that wasn't realized until this week's episode. For the most part the lives of Hodgins, Angela and Cam have that soap opera element to them. Well, more Angela and Hodgins as we saw in this installment. No, really, think about it. A longing love that would not be reciprocated; a marriage that never was; the mysterious "other man"; the loss of trust between the two. Take all of those plot points out and they could have been part of the new 90210 except, well, they would be better acted on Bones.

Despite the disappointment from many fans, the breakup of Angela and Hodgins was a good thing. Workplace romance on television is always a risk because it can go stale at a moment's notice. Angela and Hodgins looked to be heading down that path anyway. Now, instead of having a multi-episode arc where there relationship breaks down into constant snipping between each other, new storyline avenues can be opened up for both of these characters.

This episode was also a big one for the young Dr. Sweets. After being on the periphery of the Squints for most of last season, Lance really became fully intertwined with the group. Thing is, the fit is off. Where Booth actually fits pretty snugly with the team now, there doesn't seem to be a place for Sweets amidst this group. Oh, helping Bones and Booth profile a potential killer...absolutely. Sitting there while one of Bones' assistants of the week talks about stress fractures in the fourth and fifth thoracic vertebrae is another story.

Whew! That was a lot to talk about concerning the season premiere of Bones. Next week, we get back into the swing of things with an episode that involves a trashy talk show host and an outhouse. No, there's no joke there.

How was the season premiere of Bones?
Great episode. Loved both segments.240 (39.5%)
The London scenes were okay. The scenes at the Jeffersonian were better.111 (18.3%)
Reverse of the above option.63 (10.4%)
The premiere could have been better193 (31.8%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

32 Comments

Filter by:
lisa

And ColleenS, I absolutely agree about Sweets. I read a fairly convincing argument after the season finale that laid out evidence, based on the show's own scripts, showing that it made more sense for Sweets to be the killer instead of Zach. Indeed, the incredibly creepy scene in the season premiere with Sweets wanting to touch the brain made me think of that all over again!

September 09 2008 at 7:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
lisa

PB said, back on the 4th: "You HAD some very good writiers, I hope that you will be able to find equal replacements very soon..."

That's what I don't get at all - it's the same writers! It's the quality of the show that's suffered so horribly in recent episodes, and yet it's the same writers.

Like literally every other viewer I personally know, I hated (really, really, really hated) the season finale and also disliked the season premiere. I feel like the writers are treating both their characters and us viewers like they/we are stupid. If the promos are any indication, I suspect soon I'll have an hour free, because I won't be watching this any more. Bring back the show I loved!

September 09 2008 at 7:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
basil

Too much of a soap opera, too much of Sweets, and too boring of a new guy.

September 08 2008 at 2:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ColleenS

I have to say I did not enjoy the episode at all. I don't think that Bones and Booth would have let the Butler take the blame for the girl's death without solid proof that he did it. They would have fought tooth and nail to find the real killer. Throw away episode for sure.
I really don't like Sweets and I have many reasons for feeling that way. His advice to Cam sucked. Dear Abby and Ann Landers would never have told her to tell Angela that she slept with Grayson. It was her guilt, she did not need to share it. His further meddling in the squints lives
just made things worse. Another example is in last seasons finale when Sweets chose not to tell Bones that Booth was alive. It seems to me that he was trying to drive a wedge between them and make them fight. He just seems far to immature to be able to give advice/therapy to others.

I wish the show was getting better but it appears to be getting worse. Breaks my heart to see it go down hill.

September 06 2008 at 7:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
stuart d

The single most inept portrayal of Britain since Dick Van Dyke in 'Mary Poppins'. Did the writers even bother to bring up the Wikipedia page on England? Pathetic - and the cliche ridden portrayal of Booth as the idiotic American Abraod was lamost as insulting.

This series jumped the shark at the end of last season - who'd have thought it could manage to get even worse so quickly.

Sack who ever wrote this lazy, unprofessional and pathetic rubbish.

September 06 2008 at 12:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Karen M

I *love* Sweets. I know it made no sense why he was hanging around there with no office, but it was great to see him anyway. Other than that, I thought because I watched this show in about 8 different sittings made it seem disjointed and the cases nonsensical, but I see from the comments maybe it just WAS that way. I only laughed aloud once, at the "Did [Jamaican guy] get off OK?" question.

Just too many characters doing things...out of character. Why would Hodgins and Angela go through so much together and stand by each other, only to break up in such an unlikely manner? In essence, they allowed [Jamaican guy] to come between them--so [Jamaican guy] did "win" after all.

Grr. And I doubt it'll turn for the better in upcoming eps, since they've already filmed them!

September 05 2008 at 8:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Vito

I am so glad Bones is back on.

A few things:
-Good riddance to Zack. His character was good in the beginning but got progressively worse.
-Sweets rocks. Sweets is hysterical. More Sweets.
-I agree that the Angela/Hodgins break-up was rushed and could have been handled better.

Not the best episode but I still enjoyed it. Welcome back, Bones!

September 05 2008 at 5:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
nattyff

the murderers were lame, but i really enjoy the stupid jokes!!!, and i also love sweets, he is a very funny character and i like the fact that know he has more screen time. Still mad about zack too, and it has to do more with the fact that they don't even explain the change, more than the fact that they made him a bad guy... comedy aside (witch i really enjoy), the show is really falling down... hope they can put it togueter soon.

September 05 2008 at 4:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
metz

Boy, these were 2 bad episodes strung together to make 2 hours of bad bones. The Angela / Hodgins stuff was incredibly contrived. The crimes were worse than a "murder she wrote" episode and the scenes of Booth not being able to adapt in London were painful to watch.

I was really hoping for a rebound after last season's excremental final episode but I didn't see it last night. If they continue down this track I can't see the show lasting beyond this season (if it even makes it that far).

Hart Hanson better get back on the stick and start exerting some quality control over his writers. The acting is still good, but they've been given some horrible lines to recite.

September 05 2008 at 1:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Amanda

I want a Bobble-head bobby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

September 04 2008 at 11:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners