Powered by i.TV
May 26, 2012

J.J. Abrams offers scoops about the new Star Trek movie

by Allison Waldman, posted Nov 19th 2008 8:38AM
Quinto spockI went to see Quantum of Solace over the weekend anxious to see the second Daniel Craig iteration as James Bond, and had the chance to see the big screen full trailer for J.J. Abrams' re-imagining of Star Trek. Of the latter, I'd be very skeptical. After reading many of Abrams comments --like "I've never been a fan of Star Trek" -- my Trekkie (not Trekker) heart fears that the Lost/Alias creator had bungled the ST that I know so well.

So, now that I've seen the trailer, I'm even more concerned. Oy vey, what has Abrams done to the Trek universe? The trailer looked more generic sci-fi that ST to me. And where was the iconic music? Why was Kirk using his middle name; I don't think he ever did that on the TV series!

J.J. addressed the media and shared some clips and information -- but no photos -- of the feature which won't be hitting theaters till May 8, 2009. I'm a little more relieved by the description of the scenes. Here's the gist of what they're about:

-- In Iowa, where Kirk was born, 23-year-old James Tiberius is shown drinking a beer in a bar, trying to pick up a Starfleet cadet name Uhura, fighting with four MPs, and meeting Captain Christopher Pike. Pike challenges Kirk to be a better Starfleet officer than his father, daring him to join the service. All this is consistent with ST lore, although why all these folks are in Iowa is weird...unless there's a Starfleet Academy in the corn fields. (If you build a starship, they will come?)

-- Dr. McCoy sneaks Jim onto the Enterprise by giving him an injection that makes Kirk exhibit the symptoms of a rare disease. Suffering the effects, Kirk tries to make the crew aware of a Romulan threat. Young Mr. Spock has a scene with his mother Amanda, now played by Winona Ryder. Eric Bana is Nero, a nefarious Romulan. I like the idea of the Romulans being part of the story; they were always more interesting adversaries than the Klingons because they were more like the Vulcans.

-- Kirk, Sulu and another Starfleet rookie are dropped via parachute to Vulcan where they have to disable a giant drill that could destroy the planet. Meanwhile, on the Enterprise, Spock has to figure out how to save his home world from becoming a black hole.

-- In the strangest, and perhaps the most controversial scene -- or so it seems -- the future Spock (Leonard Nimoy) encounters Kirk and Scotty on a remote, frozen planet where he teaches Scotty how to teleport beings at warp speed. That sounds like the creation of the transporter to me, but I guess we'll have to wait and see it in Abrams' version.

So, I'm going to try to remain hopeful about Star Trek. Maybe the next trailer will have the Alexander Courage theme. Maybe there'll be one shot of the Enterprise that looks recognizable.

I can't help but flashback to last night's Big Bang Theory; Sheldon and Koothrappali got into an ongoing debate about the best/worst Star Trek feature films. Heaven help us if J.J. Abrams' Star Trek is like either ST1 or ST5!

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

36 Comments

Filter by:
frog212

I have never been a star trek fan and purposely avoided it. However this new trailer makes me want to check out the movie.

November 22 2008 at 5:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Usama

Why does this article imply that Spock is giving transporter technology to the humans from the future? I thought, from watching the trailer, that young Spock transports onto a planet pretty early in the movie.

November 20 2008 at 9:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
RT

Abrams can make anything he touches convoluted. Worst choice of a director since Robert Wise did the first movie... he had never even seen an episode.

And Winona Ryder? Was Britney Spears unavailable?

November 20 2008 at 8:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Chris the marketer

Good riddance to rubish. . . I can't remember a decent star trek movie, so throw it all out.

Yet looking at this, and I read somewhere about time travel? why the f does every Star Trek Movie have time travel? don't you know Time Travel is Fonzie jumping a shark?!

November 20 2008 at 6:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
james

I really love Star Trek. IT's an amazing and relevant social commentary the way that Buffy was. That said, it is a rather B-quality SciFi show that happened to resonate with a lot of people. If this movie makes those that have never had an interest in the show, sit up and take notice then it did it's job. I was the guy that stood up and cheered when KIRK FINALLY died in Generations. I am so excited to finally get a new take on Star Trek. Those of you that are die-hard fans that don't like the new show, you will be missed.

November 19 2008 at 8:18 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
purpleslog

"...Kirk, Sulu and another Starfleet rookie..."

Uh oh. Guess which one has a red shirt as part of his uniform?

November 19 2008 at 7:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Andrew

Judging by the comments on this post, people take Star Trek waaay too seriously. It's just a movie, guys!

November 19 2008 at 4:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tracey

Ever since I first saw the pictures of the cast in makeup and costume, I've been referring to this movie as "Star Trek: The Abercrombie and Fitch Generation." But I'm willing to give it a chance. And I'm doing my best to restrain my geekish impulses (Romulans? When they first appeared in Balance of Terror, the Federation had not had any contact with them for more than a century and no one even knew what they looked like! No, no, stop it, stop geeking out...)

But seriously... I'm tired of seeing Star Trek made by people who hate Star Trek (see: Berman), and who think that whatever they pull out of their butt is better than a television classic (see: Berman). And I'm tired of seeing the names of classic televsion shows slapped onto movies that have little or nothing to do with the beloved original (I Spy leaps to mind, among others too numerous to mention). And when JJ brags that he's not a Trekkie, and the writers disregard established canon ... that suggests a lack of respect for the source material that I find troubling. Is this a Star Trek movie, or is it a movie that uses some familiar names and costumes to extract money from my pocket?

November 19 2008 at 3:00 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to tracey's comment
Keith

Well done, Tracey -- you beat me to it. :)

I'm embarrassed to say that this was the first thing that crossed my mind, too, when I read that sentence! (Not the exact episode, per se, but I do remember that plot point.)

Retcon alert!

November 20 2008 at 5:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
L'Emmerdeur

I'm all for breaking canon, and I loved the trailer, but...

ENOUGH with the time travel cop-out already. This plot device has been used to death by too many sci-fi franchises, especially Trek. It is one thing to create a show, movie or franchise with a core time travel theme (Terminator), another to introduce the plot device as a crutch for bankrupt creativity.

November 19 2008 at 2:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

Really 0megapart!cle? All the Trek fans I know LOVE this trailer. And just for a point of reference, my group of fans are original....been fans since 9/8/66. Perhaps you are longing for more Berman-Trek? Anyway, this is what I'm calling the 'true' next generation of Star Trek and I can't wait to see it!!

November 19 2008 at 12:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners