Big Brother 11: Nominations #4

Why are the producers letting Chima get by with giving them the finger and using so much of a fowl mouth? When they told her to put on her microphone she gave the camera the finger. It makes the show look so stupid when they let her get by with so much dirt. She is such a bad image for all black people. Take her off now before she ruins the whole program. She is a racist and a bigot. Don't let her be on the jury either. I am ashamed of all her actions.

take chima and nat out..and go home with pride like jessie did..you jerks,,,IT IS A GAME....A GAME...CHIMA U NEED TO GO...GET SOME THERAPY

you know what chima..jessie excepted it why cant you...get over it, it is a game..A GAME...god i want you to go so bad and to take the skank nat with you and your ugly attitude's..you thought you ruled..but guess again...a game a game...................go jeff and jordan..go skanks nat and chima

I AGREE WITH MOST, THAT JEFF WILL PUT NASTY NAT AND JESS ON THE BLOCK, I THINK IT IS BETTER TO GET JESSIE OUT AS HE HAS A BETTER CHANCE OF WINNING THE HOH THEN NATALIE IS, IF NATALIE IS LEFT AND JESS GONE, SHE WILL GO NUTS ABOUT IT AND WILL BE UP NEXT WEEK AND I THINK IT WILL BE JEFF WHO WILL WIN IT ALL. BETTER PLAYER SO FAR.

I'm simply stating the obvious. It's just as wrong to give someone else an also obvious advantage which you originally failed to mention I have nothing to be embarrassed about. No one had a say in bringing jesse back except the producers which I'm saying is different than a public vote to give Jeff the Coup d' Etat. Public votes are part of the show. Producers bringing back a player that doesn't involve an all-stars concept is not. You made a point of complaining about one and not the other.

I did very well in high school, thank you.

i have never watched this show until i saw the black chick with the big lucious d***sucking lips. WOW!!!!!!!!!

Hi Joyce,

You're right. Giving Jessie the HOH because he was a returning player was wrong, too. Especially since the first task seemed geared for the athletes. But I don't care about him. I didn't like him last year and I don't like him this year. I don't care if he goes home this week. I don't care who wins this game. GIVING AN ULTIMATE
POWER TO SOMEONE BECAUSE OF A PHONE POLL IS WHAT I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT. I'm don't care who gets evicted. In case you missed it (and obviously you did), I would feel the same if Jeff was the HOH and
Natalie held the coup d'etat. THE RULE RUINS THE GAME. Now, go back to the high school you dropped out of and learn how to read, please.
You're embarrassing yourself.

I love how Natalie likes to walk around talking about her team. "We" are winners...blah, blah, blah. She hasn't done anything in the game except follow Jessie around. I would actually like him to go home just to see her reaction to playing without anyone to cover for her.

Apparently, there are hero worshippers out there for Jessie, too. Where was your indignation and sense of fairplay when Jesse was brought back and GIVEN a free HOH? This would have been a totally different game without Jesse's presence.

Thank you Michael for reminding me about Jeff's POV victory. I couldn't actually remember which is why I asked the question.

I don't think I understand why an underdog deserves a chance to control the game in the manner the coup d'etat provides. This goes way beyond making your opinion heard. Would you feel the same if Jeff was HOH and Natalie held the coup d'etat? Somehow, I doubt it. But I would. An arbitrary rule predicated on nothing but a willingness for outsiders to call and vote is unnecessary and ruins the game, especially when the ones playing the game aren't aware that outsiders are calling the shots. I know you only like this rule because your hero gets to stay for free without winning and you were afraid of losing him. But I think an objective person would see the rule for what it is and it is patently unfair. But hero-worshippers are rarely objective.