Wow. I knew Fox had cut a lot of shows short that I liked, but that list was pretty inclusive. And I am one of the fossils who loved Werewolf and Beans Baxter at the beginning.

From the comments, I'd add Dark Angel pretty high, for sure.

Firefly was a killer. Drive was the last straw. I've tried to not get involved with any Fox shows, since then. That's why I'm watching Lie to Me and Dollhouse on my Roku. Thank you Amazon Video!

Where's Key West in that list? And although it wasn't canceled after 2 seasons, Fox executives really messed up Sliders after the 2nd season...

Let's get real. Some of these shows were good, even great, while others were seriously flawed. Wonderfalls (as well as Pushing Daisies) had a manic over-the-top craziness that made it hard for the audience to connect. Others had weak central characters; John Doe had all personal memories erased (like the "puppets" in Dollhouse) and so again, nothing there for audiences to relate to. Firefly, on the other hand, was an awesome, nearly perfect show.

besides the Dr. Who already mentioned... i also was hoping that White Dwarf TV movie would've been picked up as a series.

also missing from the list... Alien Nation. they only did 1 season and ended on a cliffhanger. they somewhat made up for that by making 5 TV movies after the fact. still doesn't excuse the original cancellation though.

i sorta hope they do something similar with Terminator ... but with theatrical movies coming out... making a TV movie based on another timeline seems incredibly unlikely.

I seem to remember watching X-Files in that same death slot for years.

"The only conclusion is that Fox is out there to kill TV shows, and they take the shows in bad faith. They just don't want the other networks to get these shows. So they take as many shows as they can, greenlight them, produce a few episodes, kill it off, and keep the rights so that it can't go anywhere else. This is their secret business model."

I'm not sure if you are being glib here or sincere. If that is what you honestly believe is happening, I'm not sure that anything I say will convince you otherwise. I can't believe that television works that way--it just isn't good business to spend so much developing and greenlighting shows and then abandoning them. In fact, FOX was so gung-ho about Dollhouse it even made it part of its fewer-commercial shows (had a catchy name but I forget it). To me that indicates they wanted it to be a hit.

For me, there are many other conclusions to reach than the secret business plan you mention, and most of them seem more logical to me. I don't like them; I wish it were otherwise, but they strike me as simpler and more in line with what little I understand about the business end of TV.

ABC is doing a lot of these same things with another show I love, Better Off Ted. What links these shows is not sci-fi, but low ratings. When a show has high ratings (Fringe, Lost) it is treated one way. When it does not (Dollhouse, BOT) it draws the short straw often as not.

Firefly is right on the money. It's too bad about some of these for sure.

The Show

Three words. GET A LIFE

I don't think family guy should have been on the list, it came back and is now a highly rated show.
He totally left off Kitchen Confidential with Bradley Cooper and Dark Angel with Jessica Alba.

Am I the only one getting tired of people bashing FOX? Most networks never even TRY a show like any of the ones on this list. No one bashes CBS for Not Even Trying. I blame the audience, which doesn't watch these shows in enough numbers to make them profitable.

Frankly the tone of the article was a little wacky, to me--almost narcissistic. The idea that FOX just loves spending money developing shows only to ax them as a way of breaking the hearts of fanboys everywhere strikes me as naive and tired.

I LOVE most of the shows mentioned on the list. Firefly I consider one of the greatest shows ever to air. I regularly rail against an audience that didn't have the taste to support it. But do I blame the network that picked up a second season of Dollhouse (the lowest rated show ever to get a season 2) or gave AD three seasons? Nope.

When I read these sort of articles I always remember the sign in an old bosses office--"It's not called Show Art." No one wants to make bad shows or cancel shows people love. But this is not the BBC--these shows are not supported by tax dollars or good wishes. Someone needs to pay for the writers and cameramen and effects and actors.

For me, I say good for FOX for constantly developing these shows and trying to find an audience for them. Fall would be much more boring if all we got was CSI: Dubuque.