What if House stopped being a procedural?
I have a problem with procedurals. I tend to get bored with the same formula week in and week out. And yet, I've been enjoying House for years, despite the incredibly repetitive sequence of events we get every week. The reason for that is because of the brilliance of the character Gregory House, and Hugh Laurie's portrayal of him.As Jonathan mentioned in his review of House's season premiere, this two-hour trip into the insane asylum broke the procedural formula completely. Not only did we not see House cure any medical ailments, we didn't see the rest of the cast at all, save a quick cameo by Wilson. Instead, we got a character study and a major breakthrough for House.
But a breakthrough is a beginning. What if the show, like the character, had a transformation of its own? How about a medical-based drama instead of a medical procedural? We can still have cases and House diagnosing them, but dump the weekly formula and instead make it about the characters and their lives.
I loved spending two hours with Gregory House, the man. There's a whole cast of people with lives and loves on this show. Would it ruin the show to make it more about the people than the case-of-the-week? There's plenty of drama to play with. I know what kind of television viewer I am, though, and what kinds of shows I do and don't like. The ratings say that viewers love procedurals, but this non-procedural episode of House got huge ratings.
Non-procedural has worked for hospital dramas like ER and Grey's Anatomy. Could it work for House? Or would it take too much of the focus off of the main character? What are your thoughts? Would you watch House as a straight-up medical drama, or should FOX leave well enough alone?
Check out clips and episodes of House to make an informed decision at SlashControl.
| No, I love the medical mysteries each week | |
|---|---|
| Yes, I'd like it more as a straight-up drama | |
| It doesn't matter, as long as House is in it |

11 Comments