Powered by i.TV
February 12, 2012
 
CONNECT    

The Office: The Promotion

by Jason Hughes, posted Oct 2nd 2009 1:40AM
John Krasinski(S06E03) Your regular host, the esteemed Joel Keller, is off hiking the Appalachian Trail this week, so he asked me to cover for him. He should be back in time for the nuptials of Pam and Jim next week. But before we could get to that, David Wallace decided to throw new co-manager Jim a major curveball fresh into his new job.

I'm with Joel on the David Wallace situation. Is he really as clueless about how things are at the Scranton branch? My experience with executives is that ... well, he probably is. In fact, on the one hand, I'll say it's a smart move to make Jim and Michael co-managers. Wallace knows the branch brings in solid sales figures, but he also knows what a loose cannon Michael is.

Maybe the thought was that Jim could reign him in and bring a semblance of sanity to the office. If tonight's challenge is any indication, it's not gonna happen.

It looks like the economic woes of Dunder-Mifflin continue, as the co-managers got word that raises weren't even going to match the prior year's increases. I expected that Michael and Jim would butt heads over every little thing that came up, but the level to which they were sparring over who was supposed to be responsible for the raises showed that Jim is perfectly willing to stoop to Michael's level.

The scene in the conference room where Michael was making fun of Jim for wanting to use his brain and think about the pros and cons of the raise option was really well done. You can see that Jim feels a little overwhelmed by the whole thing, and he's nervous about what the right move is. Meanwhile, Michael is just putting it off. I found myself wondering what Michael would have done if Jim hadn't been there? Low raises for everyone, or give the raise to himself and tell everyone there was no money for raises this year.

Jim's solution to give the money to the sales staff was never going to fly, and even worse than that was his idea to tell everybody his plan. Of course they were going to see it as him siding with Pam and his former colleagues. This is the second or third time we've seen Jim not handle real responsibility as well as he thinks he can. I guess we're going to get to see him grow as a leader, if the plan is to keep him on as co-manager.

I spent much of the episode worrying that Michael was never going to accept the new status quo in the office and that we'd just have him and Jim battling out every decision throughout the season. But it looks like "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." The attempt to give out the raises merit-based backfired on both of them, so now the entire office is angry with both managers.

All to the delight of Dwight, though they weren't angry enough to drag Jim out of his office and take it all out on him. I kind of agree with Oscar, though. Co-leaders as a concept isn't designed to work, and I don't see this one working either.

I actually appreciated that we didn't get a final solution as to what they're going to do about the raises. Instead, they commiserated their situation over two "World's Best Boss" mugs, a genuinely nice gesture from Michael. Maybe they'll work together after all.

Post-It Notes:
  • Creed asked Meredith why they've never -- and she says they did.
  • Even better, when Dwight blamed Jim under his breath and said it was Creed who spoke, Creed agreed that he'd said it. And believed it.
  • Ryan actually duped Pam into giving him fifty bucks on a gambling scheme. Oh Pam, I thought you were smarter than that.
  • The response from Oscar and Angela when Jim told them they were smart, as consolation for not getting a raise under his proposed plan was so perfectly sarcastic.
  • I laughed when Kelly was supposed to be discussing the dynamic of both Michael and Jim as managers, and it devolved into choosing which was better between Lauren Conrad and Heidi Montag. For the record Heidi lost because she had bad skin, among other reasons.
[You can see clips and free episodes from our friends at SlashControl.]


Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

11 Comments

Filter by:
Larry

"Hiking the Appalachian Trail"? Like Mark Sanford was "hiking the Appalachaian trail"?

Is it just me, or have the first three episodes this season been "meh"? If this were season one, I would have stopped watching by now.

October 03 2009 at 8:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
CC

I can't stand co-manager Jim. He just doesn't have the skills or personality to be a manager. And he is just too smug now (he was already smug before but now he's the boss - co-boss).

Why didn't they just give low raises (1.5%, was it?) to everyone? How does that even work anyway - corporate says Scranton's payroll last year was $100K, we can give you 18% more this year? And it's up to Jim and Michael to decide how to distribute that extra money? Because even if corporate gave 18% increase to Scranton, it's not as simple as doling out 1 or 2 % to each person. Not everyone makes the same amount of money so it's not as simple.

Unless the increase that corporate could give is only 1.5% - so trying to decide who gets a raise or not would have to depend on the amount of money, not percentage.

It just drove me crazy - I don't think either Michael or Jim know what they are talking about when it comes to these raises. Probably should have gotten some advice from accounting...

October 02 2009 at 11:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mel

Good review, thanks Jason.

I also loved Oscar's take on two managers.... what nation doesnt have two presidents? the two popes!
hilarious

how about Kevin's memo on the check to Pam: to loves eternal reign... or something! haha

October 02 2009 at 6:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
rahul

i liked that Michael fills the world's best boss mugs with gin, it explains a lot if he's just drunk most of the time.

October 02 2009 at 11:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sarah

last night's episode is the exact reason why you aren't supposed to tell your coworkers your salary. i think giving the raise to some and not others would have worked if they didn't disclose that information.

oh, and you missed the fact that what Michael had been drinking out of the "World's Best Boss" mug was gin all along.

October 02 2009 at 11:16 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sylvanus

Where did Jim's office come from?? Lol I had never seen it before.

October 02 2009 at 10:33 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Sylvanus's comment
RJ

Looks like they moved accounting to the other side, and put a new office in.

October 02 2009 at 12:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Willmore2000

The Office felt a little claustrophobic with the new office in the ... office.

October 02 2009 at 10:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ed

What does a bean mean?

October 02 2009 at 8:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rhomboid

I don't think Wallace is all that clueless. He knew that if he didn't promote Jim he would walk and take his clients with him to another company. (Or at least that was the gamble that Jim was playing -- not sure if he actually had that offer or not.) And obviously he must know that Micheal is a bumbling idiot, so it would be really unwise to put him in charge of even more people. It would be logical to wonder why Wallace hasn't let Micheal go a long time ago but I get the impression that in general management-types are always reluctant to fire other management-types because they require extensively documented cause for negligence otherwise they can bring civil lawsuits, like with Jan. (Of course, you could argue that the entire footage of this neverending documentary that's being produced is ample evidence.) Anyway, if you don't want Jim to leave and you don't want to fire nor promote Michael, then all you're really left with is having them share.

October 02 2009 at 4:47 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tingrin87

Jim fucked up, plain and simple.
NEVER go to a large group of people and say that some people are geting more money than others.

The simplest solution (the one that ruffles the least feathers) would have been an across-the-board increase. Then, if an employee comes to you under the impression that they should have received a larger increase than their coworkers, you let them tell you why they deserve it and Coworker X doesn't.

October 02 2009 at 4:33 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners