Powered by i.TV
February 11, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Sundays with Seth: The problem with wives ... and babies

by Jason Hughes, posted Nov 16th 2009 2:41AM
American Dad: Shallow VowsIt was nice to cut back Seth MacFarlane's domination of Sunday nights to only three shows. As much as I enjoy all three shows in a general sense, two-and-a-half hours of MacFarlane's brand of humor was a bit much. I continue to enjoy the growth of The Cleveland Show more and more; I'm beginning to see why FOX went ahead and gave it an early season two pick-up.

After a shaky start, we're starting to get a better feel for all these new characters, and I'm finding little things about them to enjoy. It's little things like Arianna's love of confetti that add layers to the character. And while I'm sure it's politically incorrect of me, I find Kendra tooling around in her Rascal absolutely hilarious. That and the over-eating, but all with such a sweet disposition and voice.

When she ordered the breadbowl filled with chicken wings, I had the expected sense of guilt that we're making fun of an overweight person's struggles with food. But what isn't MacFarlane willing to poke fun at? At least he's made Kendra a likable character. It would be worse if she was a bitch along with her other problems.

Both American Dad and The Cleveland Show tackled the issues of men's expectations of their wives. Cleveland's assumption that Donna would inevitably become friends with the wives of his friends is actually pretty typical of men. When men get along, it just seems incredibly convenient that our spouses would get along as well, so we simply expect them to.

The Cleveland Show: Ladies' NightIt was extra sweet of Cleveland to pretend to be with hookers so her "single lady" friends would take her back. I can't speak as much about this segment of society, but I've known some "man haters." I'm not sure if they group like that and ostracize any of their own who do find a good man, but I found myself agreeing with Cleveland that they were all stupid. Also, though, if they made Donna happy, then he did the right thing.

Loved his closing line to his wife about being sure to use a condom with the prostitutes. With Cleveland, you can't quite say for certain that he was joking.

Meanwhile, in the Smith house, we discovered the real Francine ... and it's a frightening visage to behold. I tell my wife all the time that if she ever lets herself go way downhill, it's over. This episode really illustrated what I was talking about. Yes, I know it's a horrible thing to say, and yes I'm joking when I say it, but good lord, did Francine look horrible when she let herself go.

The best thing about the whole episode was the lesson to be learned: sometimes it's okay to be shallow and petty, so long as everybody involved is happy with the arrangement. Francine doesn't want to provide for her family, and Stan doesn't want a fat wife. So bench press that couch and he'll bring home the bacon. We don't need a real lesson in a cartoon. A ridiculous one is just as important.

Another lesson could be how negligent parents can be. Roger's alter ego (one of them) so terrorized the kids that they wound up fleeing to Argentina, and how long was it before Stan and Francine realized it. At least they acknowledge all of their kids. Over on Family Guy, Peter clearly says that he has two kids at one point. I don't think we saw Meg or Chris at all, though the story of Chris's birth was enough to terrorize me away from ever witnessing another childbirth.

Family Guy: Quagmire's BabyI'm glad to see Quagmire given a chance to grow into a real supporting character again; he'd kind of become a "giggity-giggity" catchphrase machine the past few seasons. It's also good to see him talk directly to the audience from time to time. I was laughing so hard when he fell asleep on the beauty school girl's lap from child-rearing exhaustion. And while I agree Glen did the right thing by putting the baby in a new home, it would have been interesting to watch him mix parenting with his lifestyle.

I thought the clone storyline kind of fell apart by the end, much like the clones themselves. I liked Bitch-Stewie, but by the time Stewie had Brian stroking his own tail, it was losing me. Brian's clone itself wasn't all that funny, nor were any of its antics. I'm thinking it was one of their strange ideas that never really resolved itself so they just let it kind of peter out.

"I'm gonna have to lick that up."

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

7 Comments

Filter by:
tingrin87

i have a theory - babies make shows suck.
if the baby is there from 1x1, it's ok, but if it's added late in the show's lifespan (looking at you, House), it seems to just be an annoying plot point.

November 16 2009 at 3:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
izikavazo

Bitch-Stewie was very funny. I don't know why but I really enjoyed that. And American Dad is still getting better. I still don't know why the fish is around. Obviously he wasn't going to be able to be a main character, he's stuck in a fishbowl.

November 16 2009 at 3:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bruce

The whole strangeness of the scene with Stewie telling Brian to "take your index finger and thumb, wrap them around the base of your tail, and slowly move it down the legnth of your tail" (or whever his exact words were) was absolutely hilarious for some reason. It's probably the creepiest thing I've seen stewie do, and to have it end with "okay I'll make you a clone" just cracked me up even more. It's the first time family guy has actually made me laugh hard in a long time.

American Dad keeps getting better and better, and I just can't get into the Cleveland Show. I never found Cleveland to be an interesting character on FG, and I've tried watching a few episodes of the new show, and I just don't like it. The fact that it's completely derivative of FG and AD is fine - I have no problem with that. I just don't like the characters, they are artificial and forced, and the writing isn't very clever. At least not in the 3 or 4 eps I've watched. Bleh. Hope the clevland show doesn't water down the quality of American Dad and, to a lesser extent, Family Guy.

November 16 2009 at 11:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nathaniel

Glad to see this feature settling in as a regular. I looked for it two weeks ago (the week American Dad's b-plot was about going to camp... and then just kind of ended unresolved, so I was looking for discussion) and didn't find it, then (this one's my own fault) I missed last week's column after the variety show. I like that all three shows have been lumped into one review so we get all three, instead of leaving American Dad! out in the cold.

I also wanted to add how amazed I am that I'm starting to enjoy the Cleveland Show so much. I'm a TV optimist, so I figured it'd be as good as Family Guy (which I'm not a huge fan of, but do enjoy watching), but I never expected it to be as good as it has been! Glad to see MacFarlane's learning from some of Family Guy's mistakes and giving this show some more genuine heart.

November 16 2009 at 10:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mj

I guess I have a warped sense of humor. And at my age, too. I am rather bored with the Simpsons, but am hooked on Seth's shows. Granted, I didn't like them at first, but they grew on me, and now I won't miss them.

November 16 2009 at 9:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Todd

No offense intended... but I do find it amusing that you actually talk about character growth in your Family Guy reviews. The last thing I'm thinking about when watching that show is how are the characters growing as people:-)

November 16 2009 at 9:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
stg

stand by for original comments about Seth shows 'going downhill' and 'not as funny as before'

November 16 2009 at 3:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners