Powered by i.TV
February 11, 2012
 
CONNECT    

White Collar shocker causing all sorts of controversy (even on Twitter)

by Bob Sassone, posted Dec 7th 2009 2:02PM
White Collar
The twist at the end of the fall finale of White Collar last week has fans divided. Some think it came out of nowhere, some (like me) think it was shocking but will go with it (because I think it's misleading and Peter is actually still a good guy), and there are some that think it makes perfect sense because they saw it coming (yeah, right).

People on Twitter are talking about it too, including the show's creator.

White Collar creator and producer Jeff Eastin in is on Twitter and he's been posting messages regarding the episode and what the future of the show could be. Mo Ryan over at the Chicago Tribune even says that one of the message was deleted after it was posted, either by Eastin himself or USA Network. After Eastin wrote "Ha ha ha ha ha" about the episode, he said "Don't assume anything you see is what it seems." (He also said this over the weekend, which I find intriguing - maybe Peter has been planning something all along.)

As for the messages that were deleted, they include "Due to the number of complaints, they're considering rethinking the rest of season one" and "Peter has always known more than he let on, but he hasn't betrayed Neal." The former might imply that USA wants to rethink the rest of this season and the latter might give fans good feelings because it seems to imply that Peter is doing something but he's not evil and he's doing it to help Neal. Maybe Eastin deleted these messages because he realized they gave away too much of the future plot.

Ryan's column is quite good and well worth reading. And I agree with her: I'm not thrilled about the twist (even if I do believe that when the show comes back next month we'll find out Peter is still good), but I don't want the network interfering with something that could make the show deeper and more complicated.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

12 Comments

Filter by:
Aquarius121

I hate this show, really. The only reason I watched it was because of Tiffani Amber Thiessen or however you spell it. I just think it's a copy of other shows, like Burn Notice and (sometimes) NCIS, only because the main guy reminds me of Tony too much.

But, I've said that about many shows. I started out HATING NCIS, but look how I've changed! Same with Glee and Royal Pains. Maybe I'll change my mind if someone could sell it to me?

December 11 2009 at 11:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
izikavazo

It was an odd choice, but I'm sure everyone is making too much of a big deal about it. Besides that one scene the show is off to an awesome start. I'm eagerly awaiting the nest half of the season.

December 09 2009 at 12:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Deezul

And correct me if I'm wrong, but in the photo, it was a left hand. The hand they show of Burke with the ring was the right hand.

December 08 2009 at 11:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nancy

I agree the scene is misleading. The ring the guy is wearing (and I have doubts it is truly Pete) is definitely NOT the one in the photo from the ATM. The only ring Peter wears is his wedding band. Something's going on, and I think Kate will turn out to be on the wrong side.

December 07 2009 at 7:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
WhatI

The "shocker" wasn't a shock to those who didn't see the 10pm showing - the 1am showing was playing ads for the next episode(s) in January that showed the ending of this episode only a few minutes in. If USA wants to stop that practice, since it wasn't the 1st time or the 1st show to do that, it would make me alot happier.

December 07 2009 at 4:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Gina

I personally think that Burke is a good guy. Yes he has the same ring as the picture but.... I never really trusted Kate. I think she is the one trying to get something Neil stole. I don't think there is a mystery guy trying to get something from Neil.

I think Kate is setting Neil up. I think Burke caught her at the airport while he was tracking down Neil after his escape and the security camera took the picture. Remember Neil was back in custody for a few days before the FBI agreed to the deal.

I think Burke was going to maybe use Kate as bait to capture Neil but caught him quickly because Neil was upset that Kate left him and was sitting in the apartment on the floor.

I think he decided to keep tabs on Kate just in case Neil is tempted to slip back to his old ways.

Neil is starting to trust Burke with some of the info about Kate and Burke realizes that she is setting up Neil and decides to have a talk with her. That is why he is in the apartment when she gets back.

As far as the ring itself goes... It is kind of ugly. The kind of ring your wife gives you and you hate but wear it occasionally to make her happy.

December 07 2009 at 4:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mark


Kate's deep cover FBI. The Mentor program is the ring that Peter was wearing.

December 07 2009 at 4:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Mark's comment
lynn

i'm intrigued. please, explain.

December 08 2009 at 8:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
miles

The network is going stick it's foot in again and ruin another good show.

December 07 2009 at 3:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to miles's comment
Alex

What was the last show it ruined? USA seems to have a pretty great track record lol

December 07 2009 at 4:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Ian

My thoughts:
Interpol suggested that the FBI were involved in holding or keeping Kate hidden. But she apparently is free to move around (NYC?) w/o any guards, or supervision, hence her entering the apartment and being surprised to see Peter there.
Perhaps she has been put into a witness protection scheme or sorts? But why then leave her in NYC?
If it is a WPS then Peter may NOT be a "bad guy" after all. But at the minimum he is not being honest with Neal.

Also in the lest ep don't you feel he let go a trump hand in releasing the guy who has the goods on the "bad FBI agent" (I forget his name). I thought the offer of immunity was to easily dismissed and releasing the man back to the "bad guy" was done all to easy as well. SO are both thes FBI agents playing Neal Good and bad cop. Perhaps just to see how Neal reacts.....

Well at least this series has a few fresh ideas.

December 07 2009 at 3:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Willmore2000

.... And Twins.


Or alternate universe evil twin ... but he doesn't have a goatee.

December 07 2009 at 2:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners