Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

It's official: TV is better than the movies

by Danny Gallagher, posted Dec 15th 2009 8:15PM
Science has officially proven it. That TV set in your living room, sitting there being all smug and into-itself, has every right to be.

A study by the Deloitte firm dubbed the annual "State of the Media Democracy" has found that 34 percent of Americans have dubbed television as their favorite medium.

That's up 27 percent from last year and above the Internet, music and books, which they deemed to be more expensive than a night at home vegging out in front of the idiot box. Books are more expensive?!? Are libraries in dire straits for cash, too?

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

6 Comments

Filter by:
Han Solo

Except that Movies don't let you watch half the film, and just when it starts to get interesting cancel the whole thing and leave you hanging.

That happened like 5 times to me last year on TV.

December 17 2009 at 8:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Heather

Thank you! I've always tried to argue with my friends why I love TV so much and these commentators have given my reasons out. Character development and attachment wins over anything for me. Also while a movie can make a PROFOUND POINT in 2 1/2 hours, a TV show can do that in 40 minutes and continue to expound on it.

December 16 2009 at 1:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dani

A lot of people I know feel like they have to buy the books they read. I don't know if they are uncomfortable in the library or what, but casual readers seem to head to the bookstore first.

TV is probably highest on people's list because it practically comes to you. The other options you mentioned take more work than flipping channels.

December 16 2009 at 12:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Paul

I used to prefer movies to television (not that I disliked TV by any stretch). But about 4 or 5 years ago, I started to note a marked improvement overall in the quality of the writing and cinematography on the small screen, to the point where the cinematography almost caught up with film in most cases, and the writing (in my opinion) surpassed that of its big screen cousins.

The best directors and actors still tend to veer towards feature films, but I'd much rather have the detailed and in-depth stories of a television series over a 2-3 hour film. Having said that, there are still so many great films out there that don't need hours and hours of character study that the medium of television would give it.

The internet, meanwhile, is my least favourite medium artistically -- despite the fact that I spend a large chunk of my time on it and make my living making it look prettier.

December 16 2009 at 10:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Paul's comment
philly_phenom

TV series give you an entire year (and hopefully many seasons) to embrace characters and watch them grow.

Even a 4 hour epic gives you one shot to assess the characters & then the actors are off to their next project. Even in a long film, any growth they experience feels rushed. If your lucky, there will be a sequel in a year or 2, and hopefully it doesn't suck.

The other problem I have with movies is their length. I don't have time to invest 3 1/2 hours in one sitting for entertainment.

December 16 2009 at 10:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
David Cook is my Idol!

I've always preferred TV to movies. I can't even remember the last time I was in a movie theater. I think Lion King was playing.

December 15 2009 at 10:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners