"I think that anyone caught drunk driving should lose their license forever. In every state. Not sure if my law is doable or not, but I'm sticking with it."

Spoken like a typical idiot who has never had an encounter with a police officer, never seen a real criminal trial, and never known anyone who was arrested.

In Houston, the police arrest innocent people for DWI because they get paid double overtime to testify at the trials (guilty people plead out and they're not needed to testify). Many HPD officers, including the entire "DWI Task Force" make over $100,000 year in overtime pay, in addition to their regular salaries. And what about evidence? Breath tests, blood tests, videos? Naw, all it takes for a DWI conviction in ANY state is for a cop to say he thought, based on his training and experience, that you were intoxicated. Doesn't even have to be from alcohol, can be from sudafed.

But go ahead, keep your asinine opinion. Most people will nod their heads up and down in agreement with the words "child" and "children" blabbering out of their faces.

"Kinda like fighting Cop'er with Copper" -- LOL

Bob:
Get over yourself. Studies have shown that text messaging impairs your ability to drive just as much. I'm sure applying make-up and some levels of sleep deprivation are just as bad yet you only want to ban people driving forever for DUIs. This at the same time that they are dropping the level required to be considered a DUI.
DUIs have become a politicized politically correct issue for various groups like MADD instead of an issue of impairment and the saving of lives. How about banning anyone from driving forever if they ever injure someone regardless of cause?
Some people make mistakes and have to pay a price. Too bad the same can't be same about the authors of articles on this site.