Three Burning Questions About 'Undercover Boss'
In my cubicle world days as an IT guy, I always wondered if upper management would have a much different picture of what went on among the rank and file if they just took some time to come to the office and do what we did. So the premise of the new CBS reality series 'Undercover Boss' intrigued me; a CEO goes undercover to work with various employees to see what really goes on where the rubber hits the road.But after three episodes (and seeing the preview of the fourth), a few troubling questions have come up that make me wonder if this show is going to be as illuminating as originally thought:
1. Why so many food service companies? Of the five episodes already scheduled, three involve food service companies (Hooters, 7-Eleven and White Castle). I know these companies have more manual-labor, entry-level jobs than a technology company might have, and seeing the CEO of 7-Eleven struggle to make coffee is fun to watch, but the formula is going to get a little boring after a while, isn't it?
The other two episodes are for companies that also have a lot of people who do manual work: Waste Management and Churchill Downs. I can tell you right now that there's about a 99.9999% chance that the Churchill Downs episode is going to have that company's CEO shoveling horsecrap out of a stable.
But there are plenty of different companies around, and a variety of them should be represented. Yes, the CEO of IBM isn't going to be sitting in a computer room programming their latest supercomputer. And, the CEO of Intel isn't going to be flying to China to work in their manufacturing plant. But every company has employees of various positions and skill levels, and the producers should be able to figure out a creative way to give the CEO of a high-tech company, for instance, a convincing-enough cover story to fleece even the smartest employees.
2. Do some of the folks balk at "meeting the boss?" In the 7-Eleven episode, the franchisee of the Long Island store that couldn't get the company to fix the lights in the store and stock room was either not present or cut out of the "big reveal." That was where the workers were summoned to corporate HQ and found out that the unassuming guy they were training, "Danny," was really CEO Joe DePinto. She was also not shown in the epilogue, which shows what happened to the employees/owners that DePinto worked with.
This seems to be the pattern every week, and it makes a person wonder if there were some issues with some of the people who worked with the undercover boss. When I put the question to the Squadders, Isabelle wondered the same thing. "Is it normal editing? Or is it because these employees asked not to appear on TV beyond the undercover bit of the show?"
Also, it seems like that one person gets cheated out of the CEO's generosity; the 7-Eleven franchisee got some light bulbs replaced, while the other four employees got a) a promotion, b) a kidney foundation named for her, c) a freelance gig with the company's marketing department, and d) his own franchise. Which leads me to my last question:
3. Is anything really going to change? Hopefully, the hit status of the show will allow the producers to revisit the companies; this way, we can see if the epiphanies the CEOs had while working their low-level jobs turn into real policies that make the company better and their employees' lives easier.
A CEO can make any policy he or she wants, but anyone who's worked in a corporate environment knows that a policy can change drastically as it filters down through the various levels of management. It's like a game of telephone; either the policy gets miscommunicated or it doesn't get executed correctly.
And just because the three or four employees that the CEO worked with while he was undercover got a boost, doesn't mean that the thousands of others will see any improvement in their daily work lives. Without the update, the picture will be incomplete.
What company would you want to see explored on 'Undercover Boss?' Let me know in the comments.

73 Comments