Powered by i.TV
February 9, 2012
 
CONNECT    

Five Questions 'Lost' is Not Going to Answer

by Bob Sassone, posted May 17th 2010 10:31AM
LostSo now there are only two episodes of 'Lost' left (3 1/2 hours, to be exact), and they're giving us a lot of answers. Now, some fans are freaking out over those answers, but they are answers nonetheless.

However, producers Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof have said that they're not going to answer every single question that fans might have. A few weeks ago, I gave a list of the questions I wanted the show to answer before it ends, and after the jump are the five questions I don't think the show is going to bother to answer.

1. The Man in Black's real name. This isn't just a guess by me, Cuse and Lindelof said in this great interview with Alan Sepinwall that they're not going to tell us what the Man in Black's name is (if he even has one), and though some fans might not like that, it's the story they want to tell.

Lost

2. Who was shooting at the people in the outrigger? Again in the above interview, the producers say that it's too complicated to get into all of that and in the end it's too "obscure" to be important. It's too bad they didn't answer this one, because it could have been one of those cool "a-ha!" moments that fans would have gotten a kick out of.

It would be fantastic if they answered this question for fans, because it wasn't a minor part of 'The Little Prince' episode. It seemed to also tie into the time travel in some way and it always felt as if several questions would be answered if we knew who was doing the shooting.

3. How Walt figures into everything. I'm going out on a limb here with this one, because Walt was such a very big part of the first season or so that they could very well answer this question. But I just don't think they want to go too much into that at this point, especially since Michael is dead and we only have two episodes left.

The last we saw of Walt, he was a lot older, in school and not going back to the island. So I don't think they're going to update us on what's going on with Walt, even if a lot of fans would like to know why/how he was important.

Lost

4. What the Smoke Monster is made of and how it became that way. We got some information about the origin of the Smoke Monster in 'Across The Sea' (Man in Black, cave, mysterious light, etc), but I think a lot of fans aren't going to be satisfied unless we know every single thing about the Smoke Monster, including why it sometimes makes that chain noise, what its favorite food is and what his exact chemical makeup is down to every single atom and molecule.

I'd also like to know how Ben summoned the Smoke Monster by draining some mysterious puddle in the ground.

Lost5. Why ABC had that stupid 'V' logo in the corner. Actually, we can pretty much guess why this was done. Let's hope they keep it on the DVD version!

Do you care if 'Lost' doesn't answer any of the above questions?

[Follow Bob on Twitter.]

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

8 Comments

Filter by:
GerryofNorVA

Your Win-Win Strategy

Lindelof and Cuse have basically middle-fingered us fans, it's their story not ours and they don't feel compelled to satisfy our various curiosities.

I think their final episode is going to be one big Deus Ex Machina that will ultimately result in much weeping and gnashing of teeth, then rioting in the streets, then we'll focus on ripping on "Fringe" and web campaigns to revive "FlashForward".

But more seriously, they run a real risk of so pissing off Fandom that DVD sales will be as stillborn as Island babies. Football analogy: I think they're going to fumble the Big Questions and settle for a Deus Ex Machina field goal to tie the game instead going for a TD to win. If I'm right I get to yell a Nelson Munce "Ha Ha", if I'm wrong I'll be pleasantly surprised - that's your win-win strategy for "The End".

May 18 2010 at 12:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nick

I want to know what the deal is with the story line about babies not being able to be born on the island.

It seems like that was a main story line through the first 3 seasons. Then once they explained exactly what the dharma initiative was they just kind of ended it. For example why was Richard Alpert at the lab Juliet worked at trying to recruit her to come to the island? They made the problem of babies not living through birth seem like a huge deal, then just stopped.

May 17 2010 at 3:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Nick's comment
Nathan

It's not about babies being born on the island it's either about babies being conceived on the island.

I'm not sure but I am guessing its between that it has something to do with the island's time changing ability. If you are concieved on the island you don't actually exist and therefore die.

Or as an alternative I'd guess it is suggesting that a new life acquires "the light" sometime during pregnancy but cannot get the light when the mother is on the island for some reason so when it fails to do so it dies.

The more I think about it, the second one makes more sense as it may relate to the sickness.

I'm guessing also that the sickness is when you lose "the light" or almost all of "the light". The test's they did on Sayid at the Temple where to see if he had lost it.

May 18 2010 at 3:35 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jennifer

I'm pretty annoyed at all the stuff they came up with over the years that they aren't even going to bother to answer. You had 3 years to come up with answers and instead we got the Temple and crap like that? Gee, thanks.

Also? Namelessness is not cute. It's just awkward and makes you look lame, not mysterious.

May 17 2010 at 2:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Glenn

I'm going to the Times Talk Live: LOST screening this Thursday night and have already put in my question for Cuse and Lindelof - Why did children born on the island die? And why was Aaron so important?

I don't think they'll answer either one, but it's worth a shot.

May 17 2010 at 11:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Glenn's comment
Nathan

Ask him why baby's die during pregnancy? (More accurate) and is it to do with "The Light"?

May 18 2010 at 3:37 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Dan H

Well, #5 is a joke, so who cares about that.

I really don't care about MIB's name (right now I just call him MIB, although this week, I call him MIB(Adam?). I think we got enough on the smoke monster, so I am not that concerned.

I would be mildly disappointed if they don't say who was shooting at the people in the outrigger. It would have been easy enough to explain that it was Widmore's group, or others. We don't even need to know why, and just chalk it up as mistaken identity or something.

I will be very disappointed if Walt is not mentioned in the last two episodes. He was too important to the history of the show to be ignored. That doesn't mean I'll be disappointed in the finale as a whole, but I will be disappointed in that aspect.

May 17 2010 at 11:18 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mike

Clearly Lost is going to be unable to answer so many questions since they've posed countless things over the past 6 years. I think this list is fair in picking things we'll probably never find out. Being a fan of the show comes with knowing that some things are almost unanswerable - and then the show does give answers, they are kind of unfulfilling - like the whispers or the "heart of the island"/glowing spring. Answers are not needed as much as closure is - and I'm starting to get very, very nervous with only two episodes left that we're running out of time to get it.- http://thesmogger.com/2010/05/11/looking-at-lost-summarizing-the-mysteries/

May 17 2010 at 11:13 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners